67442Re: This is gonna cause problems
- Jan 1, 2008Jake - Steve
Great link. Still big grey area as best I can tell. Most of the
procumer cameras will have no problems. Making your own battery packs
(if anyone here does) may require a new approach. A lot of Pro gear
may not be a problem but I know first hand that confusion and over
zealousness can and does happen. Nothing worse than arriving and
learning your baggage is held in another state. THere are a lot of
batteries that are 100Wh.
Anyway, this is still new news and it will likely be a non issue in 4
months, but if you are traveling and do not want to be delayed,
keeping this information in mind (You will only get stopped after you
r checked bags are long gone) so that you are not turning over your
batteries if you thought you could carry on more than allowed.
Video Production (News, industrial, commercial and corporate) may not
be so easy a deal. Going through an X-Ray may flag the bag for
inspection. If I were producing a shoot that was traveling ... I would
for the next couple of months at least explore alternatives.
Thanks for the link.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Steve Watkins" <steve@...> wrote:
> Its not quite that simple. This article explains quite well and
links to the FA rules:
> So you can take lots of batteries as carry-on's, provided they are
each below a certain
> capacity, and are packaged properly.
> This will be an inconvenience to some people. But as it is possible
for lithium batteries to
> explode, I would not want the job of deciding what a reasonble
balance between safety
> and convenience is.
> Steve Elbows
> --- In email@example.com, "Jake Ludington" <jake@> wrote:
> > > Lithium Batteries Banned From Checked Bags
> > >
> > > 086>
> > >
> > > I was unable to find any exceptions, will keep looking. But holy
> > First sentence of second paragraph:
> > "Instead, passengers will be required to take loose batteries with
> > carry-on baggage, packed in plastic bags."
> > Which basically makes this a non event. :)
> > Jake Ludington
> > http://www.jakeludington.com
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>