56079Re: copyright - attribution
- Feb 1, 2007Thanks, I got it totally wrong, cheers for the clarification.
Maybe I will now realise that my fixation with trying to understand
all the wording and small detail of these licenses is not very useful
compared to Jay and otehrs suggestions to do something.
If I manage to sort my dysfunctional self out and do some creative
commons animations, do people want them in high res or 320x240?
Is there a need for any resources that would be a toolkit for creating
your own animations? Like are all the creative commons smbols already
available in formats that could be used as masks in video editing
software and suchlike?
Is there a good guideline for how many seconds people want cc
animations to be?
Are people going to try to do animations for most different license
types, or just the most commons few?
Am I right to think we do need to put the creative commons version
number in the animation for it to be valid?
Has anybody outside the US condiered the international angle? There
seem to be regionalised versions of creative commons licenses for
quite a few countries now, Ive no idea how much this matters, and I
imagine most US-based hosting services will understandably not be
catering for every permutation in a hurry?
There I go, complicating things again with questions, oops
--- In email@example.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
> Den 01.02.2007 kl. 09:54 skrev Steve Watkins <steve@...>:
> > Thanks for the clarification. I find the wording of that to be a bit
> > odd though - I read it as saying that the stuff labelled (ii) is only
> > applicable if you mention the 3rd parties to be attributed in your
> > copyright notice?
> The stuff marked (ii) only goes to the first semi-colon. It's a
> that covers sponsors and the like. When a college professor writes apaper
> he could require sharers to mention his university as a part of the
> attribution. No big deal.
> > And that the requirement to include a URL is only
> > valid if that URI contains the license info for the work?
> Yes, of course. Makes sense to me. Otherwise you have a dead-end.
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>