56033Re: [videoblogging] Re: copyright - attribution
- Feb 1, 2007Den 01.02.2007 kl. 09:54 skrev Steve Watkins <steve@...>:
> Thanks for the clarification. I find the wording of that to be a bitThe stuff marked (ii) only goes to the first semi-colon. It's a small part
> odd though - I read it as saying that the stuff labelled (ii) is only
> applicable if you mention the 3rd parties to be attributed in your
> copyright notice?
that covers sponsors and the like. When a college professor writes a paper
he could require sharers to mention his university as a part of the
attribution. No big deal.
> And that the requirement to include a URL is onlyYes, of course. Makes sense to me. Otherwise you have a dead-end.
> valid if that URI contains the license info for the work?
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
<URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>