Re: [usa-tesla] Tesla's Unified Field Theory - Boscovich
- Ed Philips: Worth noting that Einstein PUBLISHED, Tesla TALKED.
Roger: Tesla did write a few things. But the main thing is - his
paperwork on his theories were supposed to be stolen after his death.
Ed Philips: Most interesting. Have you published these revolutionary
discoveries for peer review? Can you share with us your proof of
Einstein's mistakes and how, when corrected, they agree with Boscovich?
Seems to me that such publication would earn you important recognition
in the world of modern physics and mathematics.
Roger: Most of the mistakes are just typo errors, but what is surprising
is they get recited in generations of textbooks without being corrected.
I have published some things. But most journals have a policy of not
dealing with papers that point out the maths typo errors and slips in
other papers. In Einstein's day there was a famous fable about there
only being three people who understood relativity. I think its a similar
thing with unified field theory; for most people they still don't
understand relativity, and they are nowhere near making the next
I would hope that after having gone to the work you have you could
give us something far, far, far more explicit than the above. Example:
"Here is Equation XX from Einstein's paper YY. I found the
following mistakes in it [state explicitly] and here are the corrections
I have made together with the reasons for making them again stated
explicitly. Here is the exact quote [HIS words} from Boscovich which
PROVES he anticipated Einstein."
Anything short of this isn't going to convince anyone of the validity of
- Walter, the letter I was responding to, attached to mine, was from Reese, a fairly regular contributor. I have no idea how you could have missed his letter and gotten only mine. All of the series of around 6 or so letters up to this one, and a few since, are in the stream as I see it?
From: Walter Jinright [mailto:kg4bvd@...]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [usa-tesla] Tesla's Unified Field Theory - BoscovichAll these email with the same subject, you seem to be answering someone or emailing someone, but I see no other emails but yours?Have you had your meds today sir?----- Original Message -----From: McGalliard, Frederick BSent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 1:17 PMSubject: RE: [usa-tesla] Tesla's Unified Field Theory - BoscovichYou seem to take this a bit strongly for a just suppose???Anyway, the model right now is that there are two groups of people. They look alike, but have a specific genetic variation.One group can be healed of most common infections by Penicillin, the second group dies on contact.Now submerge both groups in large populations with many other genetic differences, complicate the diagnosis and the treatment, and you see that it would be really really important to know what you are doing. Without the genetic information it is like doing surgery blindfolded. Pretty risky to say the least.And we have a lot of treatments, but only a few, and usually very vague, ways to identify the appropriate treatment for the particular patient."End of class."????
From: Reese [mailto:reeza@ reeza.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:14 PM
To: usa-tesla@yahoogrou ps.com
Subject: Re: [usa-tesla] Tesla's Unified Field Theory - Boscovich
McGalliard, Frederick B wrote:
> So, a person's genes could tell a medico whether that person would die
> as a result of accidental exposure to something? As a result of some
> genetic defect? Something like that?
> not so much die as offering a rather specific treatment with a specific
> probability of recovery or at least slowing down a progression.
That statement assumes that treatments are already in the bag.
News flash: they are not.
End of class. Go play on a busy street or something, mmmmkay? But
tell me how you would avoid the Gattaca discriminations, first.