Cool Video Showing Acoustic Phonon Patterns (it is Free Ed)
- Turn your sound on the PC down when you view this video. I found it very interesting... all these
complex standing wave patterns of resonance around us that we can't see. Check it out when you can.
Also, I watched the Jim Murray presentation at the link provided by someone, and enjoyed it.
I watched the rather crude video at a previous link provided, and the man has done some
quite interesting research and has been associated with some controversial folks, for sure.
I found some of the presentation to be quite interesting, and other parts so-so, and the pics
were bad, so couldn't tell much there but part of it was the video camera seemed to have no
operator, and the conversion into a streaming file probably lost a lot of resolution also. However,
at the very end of the lecture when he was answering questions... you actually got to seem him
and the picture at that point was much better with the lights on, etc. It was worth watching for free.
At 04:32 PM 8/31/07 -0700, you wrote:
Jim Murray did an excellent presentation at the recent 2007 ExtraOrdinary
Technology conference. I highly recommend you get his DVD from
info I was ill during his presentation and
didn't get to see it. But there was a lot of good feedback from people who
did. In conversing with him, i got a definite sense that he's on the
level, and has done his homework."
If he made the statement about the IEEE which has been attributed he
HAS to be a dishonest liar. If he didn't make the statement all bets
are off. I have no idea what was in his presentation and not inclined
to pay any money to find out. If he's "done his homework" and has
something noteworthy and doesn't care to make public and submit to
critical review that's his business. He won't get much recognition
until he does.
"Each day is a new life. Seize it. Live it."
--David Guy Powers--
- Let's keep in mind that IEEE has done a lot to further Tesla
research. They were in fact a co-sponsor of the early Tesla Symposium
events in the 80s, and some of the board members of the International Tesla
Society were IEEE members.
IEEE has always included a healthy mix of people who were interested in
Tesla, and those who were skeptical about his research lines -- somewhat
the way this list is now.
At 01:59 PM 8/28/2007, you wrote:
>I believe Jim Murray has been caught out in at least 1 <rather large>
>lie , with his comments about the IEEE at the end of that ~60 minute
>video presentation I watched.At the end he really does lay the boot into
>the IEEE & offers no proof to back it up.
>The IEEE should have some right of reply to Murray's claims.
>Ed has the experience , knowledge & probably the right to do
>it by proxy here.
>Maybe he has a gripe with the IEEE or maybe he has been exposed
>to one too many "odd" rotating magnetic fields during his extensive
>career in fringe science.
>I would not completely dismiss all that Murray has done over his lifetime
>because of a few wrong comments/statements , but I would expect him
>to be more accountable with what he says in his public presentations...
>I noticed that he became very quiet & change the subject when someone
>asked him about finding the IEEE's charter/document he claimed to exist
>& in part said that said the IEEE will not fund overunity experiments
>(or something very similar)
>I also looked through a few Tesla books yesterday & could not find any
>documentation , references or sketches to help back up the claim below
>"Tesla said that if you put six electric motors evenly spaced around a
>the motors rotating with the flywheel, that much more torque would be
>than would be expected from the energy input"
>Not to say that most electric motors/generators of the late 1800's did not
>temptingly huge flywheels & rotating power take off's for belt driving
>attached to them to use for Kinetic energy applications & experiments , AC
>"motors" from that period were big & extra heavy to say the least.
>I left Ed's more accurate description of the IEEE as it was & is today for
>Nice reply Ed.