Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

1206Re: [ukpbm] Re: the "Badly Written" rule

Expand Messages
  • Tom Tweedy
    Oct 3, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      In message <BBA2A49B.482F1%malcolm@...>, Malcolm Cornelius
      <malcolm@...> writes

      >I don't think the GM should do ANYTHING except enact the orders as written
      >by the player.
      >If the player makes a mistake, so be it, unlucky, play better.
      >They should be an adjudicator and not have any other role.
      >F(Bul) - Con when it is an army should fail.
      >Bul - Con should succeed unless the house rules require that the type of
      >piece be correctly named.
      I must admit I agree entirely here. Although I do give help to newcomers
      in 1901.

      Tom Tweedy
      Diplomacy 2000
    • Show all 18 messages in this topic