RE: [ujeni] Just a thought
- A couple of minor thoughts of my own:
1) As the article states, a lot of the money to pay for all the ARVs will
come from the Global Fund (not chump change I assure you). On top of that,
the PEPFAR money from our good President is starting to flow to the tune
of about 1 billion per year- one of the stated goals is to put 2 million
people on ARVs, and I actually believe that it will happen. We are in a
lot of meetings lately to plan out how to implement all this. None of these
moneys are loans.
2) The reason there is probably a smaller percentage of women on the Zambia
program is probably the $ they are being charged. Besides being poorer than
the men, studies prove that women worldwide or more likely to spend money
on sensible things like food/clothes for children then they are on healthcare
for themselves. In the Mombasa trial we are studying, however, there was
no ARV charge-eligibility was based on need- and about 2/3 of the people
enrolled were women. Oh and by the way, Mombasans were not exactly breaking
down the doors to get these medications. Why? You have to get tested for
one thing (nobody had to get tested for Mchape in Malawi, and we all know
how popular that program was)-and then there's stigma and all that- still
a big problem.
3) Malaria (and others) is certainly still a problem. As someone said, if
5 747s full of children crashed into Mt Kilimanjaro each day, somebody might
do something about it. One problem: of all the healthworkers I've been acquainted
with who work in Malarial areas (and have access to bednets), almost all
of them don't use it. But the Global Fund is also increasing funds specifically
towards Malaria, not to mention the Gates Foundation putting millions in
as well. So other diseases are not being completely left behind.
>-- Original Message --<BR>
>Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:13:16 -0700
>Subject: [ujeni] Just a thought
>Re: the antiretroviral program in Zambia<BR>
>Where is the money going to be coming from for Zambia to pay for all <BR>
>of these ARVs? Will it just cause Zambia to be further indebted to
>the World Bank so that when the US economy is bad we simply raise the <BR>
>interest rate on those loans to the poorest countries in the world?
>do know that in many poor African countries, the amount of money <BR>
>needed to treat one case of malaria is about twice the amount of money
>that is budgeted per person per year in the national health budgets.<BR>
>So, how then are these countries going to pay for relatively expensive
>drugs? Additionally, the biggest killers in underdeveloped countries<BR>
>are diarrhea and upper respiratory infections that get completely out <BR>
>of control because of rampant malnutrition. Clearly, it is especially
>troubling that it is predominately males who are benefiting from the <BR>
>ARV program and that the social structure of inequity within the <BR>
>family has been perpetuated. Also, I am concerned that the $8 per <BR>
>month that AIDS patients will have to pay will severely cut into the <BR>
>family budgets prohibiting families from being able to pay for food <BR>
>(especially since these drugs are going to the father of the family <BR>
>who is deemed to be more important that the mother or the children), <BR>
>so the children of AIDS patients will further suffer from <BR>
>malnutrition. Lastly, insecticide treated mosquito nets only cost <BR>
>about $10 a piece and have been shown to reduce the incidence of <BR>
>malaria up to 23% reduction in all cause mortality among children in <BR>
>malaria-endemic Africa. Not to mention that AIDS patients are also
>increased risk for malaria due to a compromised immune system. It <BR>
>seems silly to give them an $80/month ARV and then send them out to be
>bitten by malaria-infected mosquitoes all night long. Wouldn't suchTerms of Service</a>.
>countries be better served if the money was used for less expensive <BR>
>and more widespread interventions such as widespread insecticide <BR>
>treated net distribution and improved nutrition to everyone in the <BR>
>family so that they are less likely to die of simple conditions such <BR>
>as diarrhea and upper respiratory infection?<BR>
>Ok, just some thoughts. I'll step down from my soap box now.<BR>
><!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
><b>Yahoo! Groups Links</b><br>
><li>To visit your group on the web, go to:<br><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ujeni/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ujeni/</a><br>
><li>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<br><a href="mailto:email@example.com?subject=Unsubscribe">firstname.lastname@example.org</a><br>
><li>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo!
><!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->
- 'Voting doesn't fill the belly'
12 December 2004 23:59
Mozambique's ruling party, Frelimo, surged ahead last week in unofficial results from the country's recent election, puzzling analysts who had expected a neck-and-neck finish with the opposition Renamo. At the same time, evidence of ballot-stuffing in some remote districts cast a shadow over the clean bill of health that international observers gave the elections.
Projections suggest that Frelimo's presidential candidate, Armando Guebuza, will get 60% of the vote, as compared with 35% for Renamo's Afonso Dhlakama, who in 1999 collected nearly 48% of the vote. These projections are based on results posted by individual polling stations and collected by Radio Mozambique correspondents around the country.
The sharp drop in Renamo support was accompanied by an equally dramatic fall in voter turnout, with numbers expected to be between three million and 3,5-million: less than half of the eligible voters. Turnout in the 1994 and 1999 general elections was 5,4-million and 4,9-million respectively.
Analysts agreed that abstention had been highest among Renamo's traditional supporters in the largely agricultural centre and north of the country, who felt that the government had let them down, and the opposition had failed to provide a viable alternative.
"People chose to stay in the fields -- voting doesn't fill the belly," said independent journalist Marcelo Mosse.
"In the cities, the absence might have been a criticism not only of [outgoing president Joaquim] Chissano, but also of Guebuza -- he is not someone who inspires support."
The political weekly Savana described the low turnout as "a red card to the political class", which it accused of being out of touch with voters' interests.
Reports of irregularities were concentrated in Tete province in western Mozambique.
"In Tete there was clearly fraud, though not enough to affect the final result," said Luís de Brito of the Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (Eisa).
He said two voting stations in the province's Changara district had reported turnout of close to 100%, with most of these votes going to Frelimo. De Brito said the high turnout for the province as a whole gave reason for suspicion.
"In Tete, we have an average of 400 voters turning out at each voting table, compared with fewer than 300 per table in all the other provinces."
De Brito said Renamo activists had been forced to leave certain areas of Tete province early in the election campaign, which had prevented them from sending monitors to polling in those areas. Elsewhere in the country, the presence of party representatives during voting and counting was hailed as Mozambique's best safeguards against fraud.
The Mozambican Political Process Bulletin -- an independent newsletter with a wide network of correspondents -- also cited evidence of ballot-stuffing in Tsangano district of Tete province, as well as in Chicono in northern Niassa province. In the latter, 996 out of 1 000 voters registered at one station appeared to have voted, with Guebuza gaining more than 900 of the votes.
Such reports contradicted the positive assessment of international observation teams, who praised Mozambique's strong legal framework for elections, the professionalism of polling station staff, and balanced coverage both in state and private media. Asked why the international teams had not picked up the incidents of fraud cited by Eisa, De Brito said these incidents had occurred mostly at remote and inaccessible polling stations.
The international teams, including Southern African Development Community parliamentarians and representatives of the Commonwealth, the Carter Center and the European Union, were however concerned at the low electoral turnout. Several of the observer teams also mentioned the mistrust that had been created by the party-political structure of the National Electoral Commission, where Frelimo is able to force through decisions by majority vote.
Elderly pay the price for raising Aids orphans
14 December 2004 08:21
Until a week ago, elderly Hannah Dube and her five grandchildren living in the dusty village of Kezi in soutwestern Zimbabwe had been surviving on small portions of dried white melon.
Then Zimbabwe's social services stepped in, handing the 75-year-old Dube emergency aid of the staple corn grain to feed her family, caught in the grip of an HIV/Aids pandemic and a crippling drought.
Her face worn by grief and stress, the aging grandmother's plight in this remote and rural corner of Zimbabwe tells the story of the burden of many other pensioners in this southern African country where HIV/Aids has turned a million children into orphans.
The UN children's organisation Unicef estimates that more than one in five children will be orphaned in Zimbabwe by 2010, with more than 80% of those orphaned by HIV/Aids, which kills about 3 000 people per week on average.
Nine of her grandchildren are orphaned -- she is looking after five children between the ages of five and 13.
Three successive years of drought in this naturally dry region some 600km southwest of the capital, characterised by unproductive soils, and a political and economic crisis have exacerbated food shortages.
"We only eat one meal a day," said Dube, who lives in a hut next to a dusty road, where her cooking fire has long since gone out.
"We are used to it now and there is nothing unusual about it," she said.
While food is available in the shops, people like Dube and her family, who have no source of income whatsoever, cannot even dream of buying any.
Driving up to Dube's home along a narrow dust road, hundreds of people, dangling empty sacks, were seen walking back home, looking tired, hungry and dejected.
They are coming from the local business centre where they had gone to register their names for food aid to be handed out three days later.
"We were told [by an international aid organisation] to come and register our names for food coming next week. But now they say only those on the old list will be given food," Dube said.
The Zimbabwean government this year turned away foreign food aid, saying the country produced enough to feed its people.
But Harare has recently allowed the United Nations World Food Programme to undertake a one-off free food distribution to get rid of its stock left over from April when the government stopped general food aid.
Volunteer workers confirm the hunger in the area.
"It is depressing to go out there visiting the sick, handing out a few bars of soap, diapers, some antiseptic solutions -- but seeing that what is urgently needed is food," said volunteer Georgina Tshabalala.
Dube is not only struggling to provide food for her orphaned grandchildren, but also shelter.
She cleans up grass that fell while she was thatching the roof of her new mud and pole hut in this remote rural area of Zimbabwe.
With nobody to help her build or maintain their home, Dube has to risk climbing onto the roof to patch it up before the rains bring it down.
Inside, the fire has gone out.
Dube said besides the fact that their one meal has already been cooked, she could not afford to keep the fire going because she does not have the energy to regularly go to the bush to cut down firewood.
The elderly woman -- old and weak enough to be a dependent herself -- said she had no choice but to look after her some of her grandchildren.
Those who are not under her wing are probably involved in illegal gold mining, rife in the area.
"I don't really know how they are surviving, but no one helps me with anything. The chickens and the goats you see outside I sell to send these children to school," she said.
Despite the difficult living conditions and lack of food, one of her grandchildren, Dan, (7), passed his year-end school examinations with A grades. - Sapa-AFP
Improved Zim inflation still world's highest
14 December 2004 15:15
Zimbabwe's official inflation rate dropped to 149,3% last month, down from 209% in October, the state Central Statistical Office said on Tuesday. The new rate still leaves Zimbabwe with the highest inflation in the world.
The troubled Southern African country is in the midst of its worst economic crisis since independence from Britain in 1980, with inflation peaking at more than 600% last year.
With the local currency plummeting, sending a Christmas card to Europe by air mail now costs Z$40 000 (about R41) -- twice as much as a one-bedroom apartment did shortly after independence.
A dollar was equivalent to Z$2 at the time, compared with the current official rate of Z$5 600, or Z$8 000 on the black market.
The Reserve Bank attributes the recent drop to tighter fiscal policies aimed at reining in rampant profiteering and a lucrative black market in scarce commodities and hard currency.
However, the official inflation rate excludes prices on a wide range of services and imports that have continued to soar throughout the year.
The cost of medicines, vehicle repairs and health, agriculture and mining equipment has risen by more than 600%. The state telephone and postal companies have increased their fees by 1 000%.
The agriculture-based economy has collapsed in the four years since the government began seizing thousands of white-owned commercial farms for redistribution to black Zimbabweans.
The country routinely faces acute shortages of food, gasoline, hard currency and other imports. -- Sapa-AP