Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [ujeni] USA Freedom Corps: curse or blessing?

Expand Messages
  • Paul DEVER
    Freedom is a politically-charged buzzword that will ensure funding. ... From: holland@panasas.com Reply-To: ujeni@yahoogroups.com To: ujeni@yahoogroups.com
    Message 1 of 7 , Feb 1, 2002
      Freedom is a politically-charged buzzword that will ensure funding.

      ----Original Message Follows----
      From: holland@...
      Reply-To: ujeni@yahoogroups.com
      To: ujeni@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [ujeni] USA Freedom Corps: curse or blessing?
      Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:42:33 -0500

      My humble opinions. I realize I sound rather conspiracy-theorist here.

      If Bush really wanted to promote and expand the Peace Corps (double it, he
      says), if he really wanted it to become some significant part of his overall
      foreign policy, he would not have appointed Gaddi Vasquez as director.

      If the goals of the organization were not going to change with this
      consolidation, it is unlikely that the name would be changed in the way, and
      it is unlikely that he would be proposing such a politically charged word as
      "Freedom". Anyone remember Reagan's use of "freedom fighters"? Anyone
      remember the name "Operation Enduring Freedom"? Are these names associated
      in American minds with peaceful and nation-building activities? The name
      Peace Corps represents exactly the organization I wished to serve. The name
      "Freedom Corps" does not. After 40 years, why change the name if he weren't
      trying to change the focus?


      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: Eric Bone [mailto:bone@...]
      > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:35 PM
      > To: ujeni@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [ujeni] USA Freedom Corps: curse or blessing?
      > What do people think of the binding together of Peace Corps
      > with Americorps
      > and a new "Citizens Corps" (for emergency response and
      > security efforts, I
      > understand) under a new superstructure: the USA Freedom
      > Corps? Will this
      > help, hurt, or make no difference to Peace Corps? It is not
      > obvious to me
      > that there is a need for such a structure, except that it
      > creates another
      > patrotic-sounding title for politicians to say. However, my lack of
      > understanding of its benefits does not imply I am condemning
      > the idea. I
      > would like to hear some other people's thoughts.
      > Note to Paul: thoughts should be expressed concisely and in
      > less than half
      > a dozen emails.
      > -Eric
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
      > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

      Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.