Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [ujeni] Naming the Peace Corps building

Expand Messages
  • Paul DEVER
    Evan as a fellow Georgian, I am not comfortable with this. 1. As noted in the end of the story, it is a rented building. The USG owns so much property why not
    Message 1 of 2 , Feb 22, 2001
      Evan as a fellow Georgian, I am not comfortable with this.

      1. As noted in the end of the story, it is a rented building. The USG owns
      so much property why not force PC to take one of those buildings...save the
      rent money, and put it into programs.

      2. A better name would be for someone who really deserves it...have a
      contest, and maybe display a new name every month or something, but not
      someone who was at the helm for a couple of years...

      ----Original Message Follows----
      From: "Scott Geibel" <scottgeibel@...>
      Reply-To: ujeni@yahoogroups.com
      To: "Malawi RPCVs" <ujeni@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [ujeni] Naming the Peace Corps building
      Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:44:09 -0500

      Branding Iron for the Peace Corps
      By Al Kamen
      Thursday, February 22, 2001; Page A17

      Some folks in the Senate have come up with a nifty idea to name the Peace
      Corps building in downtown Washington for the key person in the
      organization's history -- and to do so just in time for celebrations of its
      40th anniversary in September.

      So whose name are they going to put atop the building at 20th and L Streets
      NW? The dynamic founding director, R. Sargent Shriver? No.

      Perhaps the legendary mother figure and longest-serving director, Loret
      Miller Ruppe, who headed the organization for eight years and refused to
      take any pay for the first year because she was afraid she couldn't do the
      job? Wrong again.

      The idea is to name it for the late senator Paul D. Coverdell (R-Ga.) who
      ran the agency for less than 2 1/2 years. By all accounts, Coverdell was a
      reasonably good director during his tenure from 1989 to 1991, though some
      cynics, noting his frequent trips to Georgia, accused him of using the job
      as a steppingstone to the Senate. This was of course much pooh-poohed by his

      But when he got to the Senate, where he served just over one term before his
      death last July, Coverdell was a staunch defender of the Peace Corps and saw
      to it that efforts to curtail or cripple it were defeated.

      Some of us Peace Corps veterans inside the Beltway will not be surprised by
      the proposed selection. But most of the 160,000 ex-volunteers not familiar
      with the ways of Washington may be upset, thinking it a tasteless political
      maneuver -- even an injustice to the memory of the 240 or so volunteers who
      died overseas from accidents or illness while serving. They would probably
      prefer Shriver or Ruppe, a Michigan Republican credited with reenergizing
      the agency, or, most likely, no one at all.

      They could argue that, since Coverdell spent far more time in the Senate
      than at the Peace Corps, that a caucus room there be named for him, or maybe
      Democratic successor Sen. Zell Miller's offices or a building in Georgia.

      But that's not how this town works. So look for Coverdell's name soon on the
      building. The building is leased, not government property, so the name might
      have to come down should the agency move in the future. But for now. . . .

      Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.