Fwd = Scientific studies "confirm crop circles are made by balls of light" -
- Forwarded by: fwestra@... (Frits Westra)
Original Date: 2 Aug 2001 13:18:32 -0000
========================== Forwarded message begins ======================
[Pictures at above URL]
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES "CONFIRM CROP CIRCLES ARE MADE BY BALLS OF LIGHT" -
DR ELTJO HASELHOFF is one of the few people on planet Earth to have
had a paper published on crop circles in a peer-reviewed scientific
journal (`Physiologa Plantarum'). His paper asserts that the
long-recognised connection of crop circles to balls of light may be
even stronger than many think. Here, in layman's terms, Dr Haselhoff
outlines the important findings of his paper...
Over the years, numerous people have claimed that they have seen how a
crop circle was created by one or more "balls of light".
Recent scientific studies have confirmed these statements:
Circumstantial evidence has shown that crop circles may very well be
made by `balls of light' indeed! This article explains the essential
elements of these studies in simple terms.
The stems of corn-type plants are characterised by little `knuckles',
at several positions along the stems (see Figure 1). These nodes act
as a kind of ligament. They allow the plants to bend towards the
light, even after they have grown to their full length.
In the early 1990s, the American biophysicist William Levengood
discovered that plants inside crop circles often had much longer nodes
than those in the undisturbed, surrounding crop. This effect is
illustrated in Figure 2.
Although there are known biological effects that can create node
lengthening, these could be easily ruled out. It was clear that
something else had happened. The effect could be simulated by placing
normal, healthy stems inside a microwave oven. The heat induced by the
microwaves made the liquids inside the nodes expand, just like the
mercury inside a thermometer. This caused the nodes to increase in
length, while the amount of lengthening increased proportionally to
the amount of microwave energy that was generated.
This finding led to the conclusion that the node lengthening effect
may be caused by the involvement of heat, possibly caused by microwave
radiation. In fact, traces of heat have been found innumerable times
in crop circles all over the world, such as dehydrated plants, burn
marks, and molten snow.
BALLS OF LIGHT
The number of `balls of light' that have been seen by eyewitnesses has
increased considerably over the last couple of years. Sized somewhere
between an egg and a football, these bright, fluorescent, flying light
objects seem to be somehow related to the crop circle phenomenon. They
often appear in the fields during the night a crop circle forms, and
have been seen (and filmed!) many times in and around crop circles.
Several persons have even claimed that they witnessed how these balls
of light actually created a crop circle.
In the year 1999, William Levengood and Nancy Talbott published a
scientific paper  that contained a study to the node lengthening
effect in three different crop circles, two in England and one in the
USA. The authors presented a `quantitative analysis'; in other words,
the article tried to explain the AMOUNT of node lengthening throughout
the crop circle, by means of physical models. The authors concluded
that the heat (that had made the nodes swell) was electromagnetic in
One year later, I contributed a paper reacting to the one by Levengood
and Talbott. This article appeared early 2001 . The paper
reinterpreted the data published by Levengood and Talbott and showed
that the node lengthening as measured in all three crop circles could
be perfectly explained by assuming that a `ball of light' had caused
the node swelling effect. An identical analysis performed on a famous
man-made formation (Dreischor, Holland, 1997) did not show these
characteristics at all.
My statements can be interpreted as follows: Imagine a dark room with
one single light bulb hanging on the ceiling. If you switch on the
light, you will notice that right below the light bulb the light
intensity on the floor will be brightest. Towards the edges of the
room, the floor will gradually become darker. This light distribution
on the floor is well understood, and can be described with high
The exact light distribution on the floor depends on the HEIGHT of the
light bulb. When the light bulb is hanging very low, almost touching
the floor, the floor underneath the light bulb will be very bright,
but the intensity will rapidly become less as you move away from it
(see Figure 3, left). When the light is hanging high on the ceiling,
however, the light intensity underneath the light will be much less
and be more evenly distributed over the floor (see Figure 3, right).
Because this mechanism is so well known, one can actually derive the
height of the light bulb after measuring the light distribution on the
This is what I suggested. As explained above, the swollen nodes inside
the crop circles may be thought of as many little thermometers,
expanding their length with increasing heat. If one assumes that the
heat was induced by a small spherical shape emitting electromagnetic
radiation, the theoretical heat distribution on the floor can be
accurately determined (similarly to the case of the light bulb, as
discussed above). I demonstrated that the measured node lengths in all
of the three crop circles studies by Levengood and Talbott perfectly
matched the temperature distribution that would be caused by a small
ball of light, hanging in the air above the centre of the circles,
emitting intense heat.
An identical analysis was repeated on a formation in Holland . An
eye witness claimed that this crop circle was created in a matter of
seconds, while a "ball of light" was floating in the air, right above
the centre of the circle . Figure 4 shows the results.
The yellow bars indicate the average node length measured at seven
different locations across the crop circle, from one edge (position
b1), through the centre (a4), to the opposite edge (b7). Note the
perfect symmetry, which is remarkable! Similar graphs were obtained
from two different cross sections through the circle, revealing a
perfect circular symmetry: long nodes towards the centre of the
circle, shorter nodes towards the edges.
The thick, continuous, blueish line represents the theoretical value
of the node length across the circle, if it were caused by a ball of
light at a height of 4 meters and 10 centimetres. (This height
corresponded to the estimate of the eyewitness). Just like the three
crop circles analysed by Levengood and Talbott, the theoretical values
for the node length (blue line) correspond perfectly to the
measurements (yellow bars).
Consequently, the circumstantial evidence left in the fields was in
perfect agreement with the words of the eyewitness: the crop circle
was indeed created with the involvement of a "ball of light".
My paper shows that the node lengthening in several crop circles
corresponds perfectly to the effect that would be created by a ball of
light, heating up the crop during the creation of the crop circle.
This is not the case for a man-made formation.
The amount of node lengthening, and in particular its symmetry over
the crop circles, lack any trivial explanation. Consequently, the
study confirms the words of eyewitnesses, stating that they saw how
crop circles were created by "balls of light."
My paper does not attempt to explain where the balls of light come
from, nor does it explain how the crop is flattened. It does, however,
give a strong argument to take the "ball of light" phenomenon, as well
as the words of eyewitnesses, very seriously, and I hope will
stimulate further study.
Finally, it should be mentioned that all these findings and
conclusions have been published in `peer-reviewed' scientific
journals. In order to guarantee a high level of reliability, such
journals employ so-called `referees' (objective, anonymous experts),
who accurately check each contributed paper for errors and
inconsistencies before it is published. Consequently, conclusions
published in peer-reviewed scientific journals can not be simply
dismissed as wild fantasy or pseudo-science. Therefore, it is fair to
say that recent scientific findings have established considerable
progress in understanding the crop circle phenomenon, although many
questions still remain unanswered.
 W C Levengood, N P Talbott, `Dispersion of energies in worldwide
crop formations', Physiol. Plant. 105: 615-624 (1999).
 E H Haselhoff, `Comment to Physiol. Plant. 105: 615-624", Physiol.
Plant. 111: 123-125 (2001).
 E H Haselhoff, http://www.dcccs.org/id48.htm
 See, for example, N P Talbott,
DR ELTJO HASELHOFF
========================== Forwarded message ends ========================