Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Unifies fields

Expand Messages
  • sgtwal@aol.com
    Do you mean different maths or different formulea? What about the physical processes that generate the fields? Yes, different ideas have been put forward but
    Message 1 of 2 , Aug 8, 2012
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Do you mean different maths or different formulea? What about the
      physical processes that generate the fields?
      Yes, different ideas have been put forward but as of today none have
      been workable or proven.
      The faulty thinking may be yours in accepting theories as facts long
      before they are proven.

      In a message dated 8/8/2012 8:43:20 A.M. US Eastern Daylight Time,
      ufonet@yahoogroups.com writes:

      1b. Re: RE; unified fields
      Posted by: "ROGER ANDERTON" R.J.Anderton@...
      Date: Tue Aug 7, 2012 3:55 pm ((PDT))

      your thinking is faulty

      <SNIP>

      1c. Re: RE; unified fields
      Posted by: "ROGER ANDERTON" R.J.Anderton@...
      Date: Tue Aug 7, 2012 3:57 pm ((PDT))

      given different fields that means maths, then the different maths merely
      needs connecting; various theories have been proposed







      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • ROGER ANDERTON
      no its yours, empirical evidence is given to verify a range of appliciability of a theory not to prove; its maths being formulas etc and describing physical
      Message 2 of 2 , Aug 8, 2012
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        no its yours, empirical evidence is given to verify a range of appliciability of a theory not to prove; its maths being formulas etc and describing physical processes



        ________________________________
        From: "sgtwal@..." <sgtwal@...>
        To: ufonet@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Wednesday, 8 August 2012, 15:44
        Subject: [UFOnet] Re: Unifies fields


         
        Do you mean different maths or different formulea? What about the
        physical processes that generate the fields?
        Yes, different ideas have been put forward but as of today none have
        been workable or proven.
        The faulty thinking may be yours in accepting theories as facts long
        before they are proven.

        In a message dated 8/8/2012 8:43:20 A.M. US Eastern Daylight Time,
        ufonet@yahoogroups.com writes:

        1b. Re: RE; unified fields
        Posted by: "ROGER ANDERTON" R.J.Anderton@...
        Date: Tue Aug 7, 2012 3:55 pm ((PDT))

        your thinking is faulty

        <SNIP>

        1c. Re: RE; unified fields
        Posted by: "ROGER ANDERTON" R.J.Anderton@...
        Date: Tue Aug 7, 2012 3:57 pm ((PDT))

        given different fields that means maths, then the different maths merely
        needs connecting; various theories have been proposed

        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.