Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE!

Expand Messages
  • nathaniel x vance
    May I please beg your darn pardon, we do not have “A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE,” that is if you are derisively referring to beloved president Barack
    Message 1 of 8 , Apr 10, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      May I please beg your darn pardon, we do not have “A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE,” that is if you are derisively referring to beloved president Barack Hussein Obama! What you do now have in the White House is instead more like an ANGEL, the same sort or kind the likes of which who visited Prophet Abraham and Lot just before those two mighty sinful cities Sodom and Gomorrah were utterly destroyed!
      How in heaven or hell do you supposed that BHO got into the high and mighty White House if it was not God ordained? Please be warned that Obama is both guided and protected 24/7 around the clock day and night along with his family by angelic forces, which you do not see nor understand! If otherwise, Obama would not be either alive today or even in your supposed White House at all!

      FYI, here also is another thing for sure, by the end of this year 2010, a greater majority of us will be saying the same thing, that Obama is a blessing to this nation and the world rather than a rambunctious Mississippi mudpie slinging buffoon like Sarah Palin, Alan Keyes and Rush Limbaugh!

      *
      ZetaTalk: Angels
      Note: written by Jul 15, 1995



      There has been much confusion about angels, who are regularly shown in the Christian religion as wearing flowing white gowns and having wings and haloes. There is no such creature, or at least no creature that looks like this, although there are entities that operate in the manner ascribed to angels. This myth sprang up during the early Christian era in response to humans in the traditional garb of that day seen floating. The robes, wafting in the wind, appeared as wings. The sunlight, reflecting off their oily hair, which in those days was never truly washed, appeared as haloes. Angels.
      How did these humans come to be floated, in plain sight of other humans, when today levitation done by ourselves or others is registered only in the subconscious? Repression of memory is a factor of the fear and anxiety of the populace. We do nothing that will increase this fear and anxiety. If the observer can view the scene and incorporate startling views without alarm, this is allowed. In the old days, where people were more accepting of magical happenings, this was the case. Today, people are more scientific, and realize they are dealing with something outside the frame of reference. Panic lies just under the surface, and the Awakening is paced with this in consideration.
      Because these humans were close to Jesus, part of his entourage in fact, they were assumed to be close to God. The typical response to any relatively unknown phenomenon clicked in - fill in the blanks. Thus we have stories of how the angels came to be, fallen angels, ranks of angels, and variations on their appearance, their personalities, and exploits of angels that grew every time they were retold. There are merely spirits, and such descriptions of angels is a way of describing good and evil, the compassion and pulling toward others that characterizes those in the Service-to-Others, or the pulling toward the self characteristic of those in the Service-to-Self. There are angels among humans who have never left this Earth. They think of others intensely. They sacrifice themselves. Are these not angels?
      All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@...
       

      The wicked ENDTIME - NOT the RIGHTEOUS! http://Zetaheaven.org:  


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • xfileresearcher
      Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following take on socialism: The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible Tyranny of criminals
      Message 2 of 8 , Apr 10, 2010
      • 0 Attachment
        Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following take on socialism: "The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible Tyranny of criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of spiritual suffering and poverty."

        Socialism cannot work in a complex society. It never has worked. It never will.

        "Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality.
        But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty,(Freedom)
        socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."(Slavery)
        Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-59



        --- In ufonet@yahoogroups.com, nathaniel x vance <broali4xa@...> wrote:
        >
        > May I please beg your darn pardon, we do not have “A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE,” that is if you are derisively referring to beloved president Barack Hussein Obama! What you do now have in the White House is instead more like an ANGEL, the same sort or kind the likes of which who visited Prophet Abraham and Lot just before those two mighty sinful cities Sodom and Gomorrah were utterly destroyed!
        > How in heaven or hell do you supposed that BHO got into the high and mighty White House if it was not God ordained? Please be warned that Obama is both guided and protected 24/7 around the clock day and night along with his family by angelic forces, which you do not see nor understand! If otherwise, Obama would not be either alive today or even in your supposed White House at all!
        >
        > FYI, here also is another thing for sure, by the end of this year 2010, a greater majority of us will be saying the same thing, that Obama is a blessing to this nation and the world rather than a rambunctious Mississippi mudpie slinging buffoon like Sarah Palin, Alan Keyes and Rush Limbaugh!
        >
        > *
        > ZetaTalk: Angels
        > Note: written by Jul 15, 1995
        >
        >
        >
        > There has been much confusion about angels, who are regularly shown in the Christian religion as wearing flowing white gowns and having wings and haloes. There is no such creature, or at least no creature that looks like this, although there are entities that operate in the manner ascribed to angels. This myth sprang up during the early Christian era in response to humans in the traditional garb of that day seen floating. The robes, wafting in the wind, appeared as wings. The sunlight, reflecting off their oily hair, which in those days was never truly washed, appeared as haloes. Angels.
        > How did these humans come to be floated, in plain sight of other humans, when today levitation done by ourselves or others is registered only in the subconscious? Repression of memory is a factor of the fear and anxiety of the populace. We do nothing that will increase this fear and anxiety. If the observer can view the scene and incorporate startling views without alarm, this is allowed. In the old days, where people were more accepting of magical happenings, this was the case. Today, people are more scientific, and realize they are dealing with something outside the frame of reference. Panic lies just under the surface, and the Awakening is paced with this in consideration.
        > Because these humans were close to Jesus, part of his entourage in fact, they were assumed to be close to God. The typical response to any relatively unknown phenomenon clicked in - fill in the blanks. Thus we have stories of how the angels came to be, fallen angels, ranks of angels, and variations on their appearance, their personalities, and exploits of angels that grew every time they were retold. There are merely spirits, and such descriptions of angels is a way of describing good and evil, the compassion and pulling toward others that characterizes those in the Service-to-Others, or the pulling toward the self characteristic of those in the Service-to-Self. There are angels among humans who have never left this Earth. They think of others intensely. They sacrifice themselves. Are these not angels?
        > All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@...
        >  
        >
        > The wicked ENDTIME - NOT the RIGHTEOUS! http://Zetaheaven.org:  
        >
        >
        > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        >
      • Michael Flora
        As usual, this is a pretty juvenile view. People are social animals. The question is basically economic. The problem is, we must have a balance between the
        Message 3 of 8 , Apr 10, 2010
        • 0 Attachment
          As usual, this is a pretty juvenile view. People are social animals. The
          question is basically economic. The problem is, we must have a balance
          between the needs of the group, i.e. things like stability, the need for
          interaction with others, the need to take care of the elderly and sick,
          etc. and the dynamism that comes from greed and selfishness as epitomized
          by capitalism. The United States at the present time is far from the
          position of balance that it needs to be in.

          Regards,
          M.R.F.

          On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:32 PM, xfileresearcher <wadesxfile@...>wrote:

          >
          >
          > Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following take on
          > socialism: "The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible Tyranny of
          > criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of
          > spiritual suffering and poverty."
          >
          > Socialism cannot work in a complex society. It never has worked. It never
          > will.
          >
          > "Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality.
          > But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in
          > liberty,(Freedom)
          > socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."(Slavery)
          > Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-59
          >
          > -
          > >
          > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
          > >
          >
          >
          >


          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        • broali4x
          The real problem is that we need to separate and remove the wicked and undecided humans from the righteous on this planet! Once done, and it will be done,
          Message 4 of 8 , Apr 11, 2010
          • 0 Attachment
            The real problem is that we need to separate and remove the wicked and
            undecided humans from the righteous on this planet!
            Once done, and it will be done, before 2112. Thereafter, the planet will
            then enjoy a world of true peace and love where no brutal military will
            again be needed or even desired!
            Why in hell must we in the USA be spending more on the military than all
            the other nations of earth combined??????
            This is sheer madness and our real aim is not defense but what - to
            conquer and subjugate the earth by force and violence period for sport
            and play mainly!



            --- In ufonet@yahoogroups.com, "xfileresearcher" <wadesxfile@...> wrote:
            >
            > Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following
            take on socialism: "The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible
            Tyranny of criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true
            hell of spiritual suffering and poverty."
            >
            > Socialism cannot work in a complex society. It never has worked. It
            never will.
            >
            > "Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word,
            equality.
            > But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in
            liberty,(Freedom)
            > socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."(Slavery)
            > Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-59
            >
            >
            >
            > --- In ufonet@yahoogroups.com, nathaniel x vance broali4xa@ wrote:
            > >
            > > May I please beg your darn pardon, we do not have “A
            MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE,” that is if you are derisively
            referring to beloved president Barack Hussein Obama! What you do now
            have in the White House is instead more like an ANGEL, the same sort or
            kind the likes of which who visited Prophet Abraham and Lot just before
            those two mighty sinful cities Sodom and Gomorrah were utterly
            destroyed!
            > > How in heaven or hell do you supposed that BHO got into the high and
            mighty White House if it was not God ordained? Please be warned that
            Obama is both guided and protected 24/7 around the clock day and night
            along with his family by angelic forces, which you do not see nor
            understand! If otherwise, Obama would not be either alive today or even
            in your supposed White House at all!
            > >
            > > FYI, here also is another thing for sure, by the end of this year
            2010, a greater majority of us will be saying the same thing, that Obama
            is a blessing to this nation and the world rather than a rambunctious
            Mississippi mudpie slinging buffoon like Sarah Palin, Alan Keyes and
            Rush Limbaugh!
            > >
            > > *
            > > ZetaTalk: Angels
            > > Note: written by Jul 15, 1995
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > There has been much confusion about angels, who are regularly shown
            in the Christian religion as wearing flowing white gowns and having
            wings and haloes. There is no such creature, or at least no creature
            that looks like this, although there are entities that operate in the
            manner ascribed to angels. This myth sprang up during the early
            Christian era in response to humans in the traditional garb of that day
            seen floating. The robes, wafting in the wind, appeared as wings. The
            sunlight, reflecting off their oily hair, which in those days was never
            truly washed, appeared as haloes. Angels.
            > > How did these humans come to be floated, in plain sight of other
            humans, when today levitation done by ourselves or others is registered
            only in the subconscious? Repression of memory is a factor of the fear
            and anxiety of the populace. We do nothing that will increase this fear
            and anxiety. If the observer can view the scene and incorporate
            startling views without alarm, this is allowed. In the old days, where
            people were more accepting of magical happenings, this was the case.
            Today, people are more scientific, and realize they are dealing with
            something outside the frame of reference. Panic lies just under the
            surface, and the Awakening is paced with this in consideration.
            > > Because these humans were close to Jesus, part of his entourage in
            fact, they were assumed to be close to God. The typical response to any
            relatively unknown phenomenon clicked in - fill in the blanks. Thus we
            have stories of how the angels came to be, fallen angels, ranks of
            angels, and variations on their appearance, their personalities, and
            exploits of angels that grew every time they were retold. There are
            merely spirits, and such descriptions of angels is a way of describing
            good and evil, the compassion and pulling toward others that
            characterizes those in the Service-to-Others, or the pulling toward the
            self characteristic of those in the Service-to-Self. There are angels
            among humans who have never left this Earth. They think of others
            intensely. They sacrifice themselves. Are these not angels?
            > > All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@
            > > Â
            > >
            > > The wicked ENDTIME - NOT the RIGHTEOUS!
            http://Zetaheaven.org:Â Â
            > >
            > >
            > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            > >
            >




            [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
          • Wade Whittaker
            The word group is an abstraction and doesn’t exist as a tangible reality. It’s like the abstraction called forest. Forest doesn’t exist. Only trees
            Message 5 of 8 , Apr 11, 2010
            • 0 Attachment
              The word group is an abstraction and doesn’t exist as a tangible reality. It’s like
              the abstraction called forest. Forest doesn’t exist. Only trees exist. Forest is the concept of
              many trees. Likewise, the word group merely describes the abstract concept of many
              individuals. Only individuals are real and, therefore, there is no such thing as group rights.
              Only individuals have rights.Just because there are many individuals in one group and only a few in another does
              not give a higher priority to the individuals in the larger group – even if you call it the state.
              A majority of voters do not have more rights than the minority. Rights are not derived from
              the power of numbers. They do not come from the group. They are intrinsic with each
              human being. Ed Griffen





              ________________________________
              From: Michael Flora <infinet.llc@...>
              To: ufonet@yahoogroups.com
              Sent: Sat, April 10, 2010 8:17:13 PM
              Subject: Re: [UFOnet] Re: A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE!

              As usual, this is a pretty juvenile view.  People are social animals.  The
              question is basically economic.  The problem is, we must have a balance
              between the needs of the group, i.e. things like stability, the need for
              interaction with others, the need to take care of the elderly and sick,
              etc.  and the dynamism that comes from greed and selfishness as epitomized
              by capitalism.  The United States at the present time is far from the
              position of balance that it needs to be in.

              Regards,
              M.R.F.

              On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:32 PM, xfileresearcher <wadesxfile@...>wrote:

              >
              >
              > Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following take on
              > socialism: "The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible Tyranny of
              > criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of
              > spiritual suffering and poverty."
              >
              > Socialism cannot work in a complex society. It never has worked. It never
              > will.
              >
              > "Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality.
              > But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in
              > liberty,(Freedom)
              > socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."(Slavery)
              > Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-59
              >
              > -
              > >
              > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
              > >
              >

              >


              [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



              ------------------------------------

              UFOnet is an international news and discussion list dedicated to:
              UFOs, UAP, Anomalous Phenomena in general and the Paranormal.

              To subscribe, send a blank e-mail message to:
              ufonet-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
              To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail message to:
              ufonet-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

              Messages to the list-owner: ufonet-owner@yahoogroups.com

              Caution, many reports of unidentified phenomena posted to this list require
              further investigation.Yahoo! Groups Links






              [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            • broali4x
              You sure must be having a hell of a lots of fun trying to dilude both yourself and the truth by using paper tiger semantics which is void of all common sense!
              Message 6 of 8 , Apr 12, 2010
              • 0 Attachment
                You sure must be having a hell of a lots of fun trying to dilude both
                yourself and the truth by using paper tiger semantics which is void of
                all common sense!
                You sound like a misguided Sarah Palin or Dick Cheney who just lost the
                election and who are sitting in a dark corner whinning for a sugary
                lolly pop!

                Mr. Wade, have you ever heard of the Tecumseh New Madrid fault?
                We need to be preparing brother and the sooner the better!





                --- In ufonet@yahoogroups.com, Wade Whittaker <wadesxfile@...> wrote:
                >
                > The word group is an abstraction and doesn’t exist as a
                tangible reality. It’s like
                > the abstraction called forest. Forest doesn’t exist. Only trees
                exist. Forest is the concept of
                > many trees. Likewise, the word group merely describes the abstract
                concept of many
                > individuals. Only individuals are real and, therefore, there is no
                such thing as group rights.
                > Only individuals have rights.Just because there are many individuals
                in one group and only a few in another does
                > not give a higher priority to the individuals in the larger group
                â€" even if you call it the state.
                > A majority of voters do not have more rights than the minority. Rights
                are not derived from
                > the power of numbers. They do not come from the group. They are
                intrinsic with each
                > human being. Ed Griffen
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > ________________________________
                > From: Michael Flora infinet.llc@...
                > To: ufonet@yahoogroups.com
                > Sent: Sat, April 10, 2010 8:17:13 PM
                > Subject: Re: [UFOnet] Re: A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
                >
                > As usual, this is a pretty juvenile view. People are social
                animals. The
                > question is basically economic. The problem is, we must have a
                balance
                > between the needs of the group, i.e. things like stability, the need
                for
                > interaction with others, the need to take care of the elderly and
                sick,
                > etc. and the dynamism that comes from greed and selfishness as
                epitomized
                > by capitalism. The United States at the present time is far from
                the
                > position of balance that it needs to be in.
                >
                > Regards,
                > M.R.F.
                >
                > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:32 PM, xfileresearcher wadesxfile@...wrote:
                >
                > >
                > >
                > > Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following
                take on
                > > socialism: "The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible
                Tyranny of
                > > criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of
                > > spiritual suffering and poverty."
                > >
                > > Socialism cannot work in a complex society. It never has worked. It
                never
                > > will.
                > >
                > > "Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word,
                equality.
                > > But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in
                > > liberty,(Freedom)
                > > socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."(Slavery)
                > > Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-59
                > >
                > > -
                > > >
                > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                > > >
                > >
                > >Â
                > >
                >
                >
                > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                >
                >
                >
                > ------------------------------------
                >
                > UFOnet is an international news and discussion list dedicated to:
                > UFOs, UAP, Anomalous Phenomena in general and the Paranormal.
                >
                > To subscribe, send a blank e-mail message to:
                > ufonet-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
                > To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail message to:
                > ufonet-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                >
                > Messages to the list-owner: ufonet-owner@yahoogroups.com
                >
                > Caution, many reports of unidentified phenomena posted to this list
                require
                > further investigation.Yahoo! Groups Links
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                >




                [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
              • xfileresearcher
                Well I have a common sense open mind and if the words I write sound like lies to you or you think I am whining.Tell me your truth.I am open to what people have
                Message 7 of 8 , Apr 12, 2010
                • 0 Attachment
                  Well I have a common sense open mind and if the words I write sound like lies to you or you think I am whining.Tell me your truth.I am open to what people have to say.I value the opinions,conclusions and recommendations of people.There really is nothing to whine about per say or argue about.And it's not about winning or loosing,Mr.Obama is my president of my country.It's all about moving forward,I wish I could say we could do so with out military action.I wish our troops could come home as soon as possible.I never judge anyone nor do I hate.I do not like a lot of things such as groups like rightwing extremeists,war mongers,biggots etc.,I'm never derogatory or call people names.Nor do I intentionally Lie.I do not jump to conclusions and I do not just take someones word as fact.I know the difference between right and wrong.I have great respect for the laws of the land.I am willing to hear what you have to say about what you believe to be true.That Is how I learn,by listening to what people have to say,asking questions and researching the information I recieve from people such as yourself.

                  --- In ufonet@yahoogroups.com, "broali4x" <broali4xa@...> wrote:
                  >
                  >
                  > You sure must be having a hell of a lots of fun trying to dilude both
                  > yourself and the truth by using paper tiger semantics which is void of
                  > all common sense!
                  > You sound like a misguided Sarah Palin or Dick Cheney who just lost the
                  > election and who are sitting in a dark corner whinning for a sugary
                  > lolly pop!
                  >
                  > Mr. Wade, have you ever heard of the Tecumseh New Madrid fault?
                  > We need to be preparing brother and the sooner the better!
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > --- In ufonet@yahoogroups.com, Wade Whittaker <wadesxfile@> wrote:
                  > >
                  > > The word group is an abstraction and doesn’t exist as a
                  > tangible reality. It’s like
                  > > the abstraction called forest. Forest doesn’t exist. Only trees
                  > exist. Forest is the concept of
                  > > many trees. Likewise, the word group merely describes the abstract
                  > concept of many
                  > > individuals. Only individuals are real and, therefore, there is no
                  > such thing as group rights.
                  > > Only individuals have rights.Just because there are many individuals
                  > in one group and only a few in another does
                  > > not give a higher priority to the individuals in the larger group
                  > â€" even if you call it the state.
                  > > A majority of voters do not have more rights than the minority. Rights
                  > are not derived from
                  > > the power of numbers. They do not come from the group. They are
                  > intrinsic with each
                  > > human being. Ed Griffen
                  > >
                  > >
                  > >
                  > >
                  > >
                  > > ________________________________
                  > > From: Michael Flora infinet.llc@
                  > > To: ufonet@yahoogroups.com
                  > > Sent: Sat, April 10, 2010 8:17:13 PM
                  > > Subject: Re: [UFOnet] Re: A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
                  > >
                  > > As usual, this is a pretty juvenile view. People are social
                  > animals. The
                  > > question is basically economic. The problem is, we must have a
                  > balance
                  > > between the needs of the group, i.e. things like stability, the need
                  > for
                  > > interaction with others, the need to take care of the elderly and
                  > sick,
                  > > etc. and the dynamism that comes from greed and selfishness as
                  > epitomized
                  > > by capitalism. The United States at the present time is far from
                  > the
                  > > position of balance that it needs to be in.
                  > >
                  > > Regards,
                  > > M.R.F.
                  > >
                  > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:32 PM, xfileresearcher wadesxfile@...:
                  > >
                  > > >
                  > > >
                  > > > Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following
                  > take on
                  > > > socialism: "The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible
                  > Tyranny of
                  > > > criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of
                  > > > spiritual suffering and poverty."
                  > > >
                  > > > Socialism cannot work in a complex society. It never has worked. It
                  > never
                  > > > will.
                  > > >
                  > > > "Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word,
                  > equality.
                  > > > But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in
                  > > > liberty,(Freedom)
                  > > > socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."(Slavery)
                  > > > Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-59
                  > > >
                  > > > -
                  > > > >
                  > > > >
                • Jeff Adams
                  This whole crap about Obama is pure and utter nonsense. He has not ONLY adopted the policies of Bush he has carried it one step further and endorsed the
                  Message 8 of 8 , Apr 13, 2010
                  • 0 Attachment
                    This whole crap about Obama is pure and utter nonsense. He has not ONLY adopted the policies of Bush he has carried it one step further and endorsed the assassinations of 'enemies' of America in lieu of having to throw more individuals in Guantanamo to save face.
                    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7089899.ece

                    He claims he wanted to re-visit the Patriot Act because it was unconstitutional and yet he re-authorized it TWICE. He is just like all the other scumbags in DC. Same hands different glove. The only difference is this time the glove is black instead of white. Don't be a schmuck!


                    When the government fears the people, you have liberty.
                    When the people fear the government, you have tyranny.
                    - -Thomas Jefferson

                    A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.
                    - - John F. Kennedy





                    ________________________________
                    From: xfileresearcher <wadesxfile@...>
                    To: ufonet@yahoogroups.com
                    Sent: Tue, April 13, 2010 2:29:22 AM
                    Subject: [UFOnet] Re: A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE!


                    Well I have a common sense open mind and if the words I write sound like lies to you or you think I am whining.Tell me your truth.I am open to what people have to say.I value the opinions,conclusion s and recommendations of people.There really is nothing to whine about per say or argue about.And it's not about winning or loosing,Mr.Obama is my president of my country.It's all about moving forward,I wish I could say we could do so with out military action.I wish our troops could come home as soon as possible.I never judge anyone nor do I hate.I do not like a lot of things such as groups like rightwing extremeists, war mongers,biggots etc.,I'm never derogatory or call people names.Nor do I intentionally Lie.I do not jump to conclusions and I do not just take someones word as fact.I know the difference between right and wrong.I have great respect for the laws of the land.I am willing to hear what you have to say about what you believe to be true.That Is how
                    I learn,by listening to what people have to say,asking questions and researching the information I recieve from people such as yourself.

                    --- In ufonet@yahoogroups. com, "broali4x" <broali4xa@. ..> wrote:
                    >
                    >
                    > You sure must be having a hell of a lots of fun trying to dilude both
                    > yourself and the truth by using paper tiger semantics which is void of
                    > all common sense!
                    > You sound like a misguided Sarah Palin or Dick Cheney who just lost the
                    > election and who are sitting in a dark corner whinning for a sugary
                    > lolly pop!
                    >
                    > Mr. Wade, have you ever heard of the Tecumseh New Madrid fault?
                    > We need to be preparing brother and the sooner the better!
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > --- In ufonet@yahoogroups. com, Wade Whittaker <wadesxfile@ > wrote:
                    > >
                    > > The word group is an abstraction and doesn’t exist as a
                    > tangible reality. It’s like
                    > > the abstraction called forest. Forest doesn’t exist. Only trees
                    > exist. Forest is the concept of
                    > > many trees. Likewise, the word group merely describes the abstract
                    > concept of many
                    > > individuals. Only individuals are real and, therefore, there is no
                    > such thing as group rights.
                    > > Only individuals have rights.Just because there are many individuals
                    > in one group and only a few in another does
                    > > not give a higher priority to the individuals in the larger group
                    > â€" even if you call it the state.
                    > > A majority of voters do not have more rights than the minority. Rights
                    > are not derived from
                    > > the power of numbers. They do not come from the group. They are
                    > intrinsic with each
                    > > human being. Ed Griffen
                    > >
                    > >
                    > >
                    > >
                    > >
                    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
                    > > From: Michael Flora infinet.llc@
                    > > To: ufonet@yahoogroups. com
                    > > Sent: Sat, April 10, 2010 8:17:13 PM
                    > > Subject: Re: [UFOnet] Re: A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
                    > >
                    > > As usual, this is a pretty juvenile view. People are social
                    > animals. The
                    > > question is basically economic. The problem is, we must have a
                    > balance
                    > > between the needs of the group, i.e. things like stability, the need
                    > for
                    > > interaction with others, the need to take care of the elderly and
                    > sick,
                    > > etc. and the dynamism that comes from greed and selfishness as
                    > epitomized
                    > > by capitalism. The United States at the present time is far from
                    > the
                    > > position of balance that it needs to be in.
                    > >
                    > > Regards,
                    > > M.R.F.
                    > >
                    > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:32 PM, xfileresearcher wadesxfile@. ..:
                    > >
                    > > >
                    > > >
                    > > > Russian thinker and author Fyodor Dostoyevsky offered the following
                    > take on
                    > > > socialism: "The future kingdom of socialism will be a terrible
                    > Tyranny of
                    > > > criminals and murderers. It will throw humanity into a true hell of
                    > > > spiritual suffering and poverty."
                    > > >
                    > > > Socialism cannot work in a complex society. It never has worked. It
                    > never
                    > > > will.
                    > > >
                    > > > "Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word,
                    > equality.
                    > > > But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in
                    > > > liberty,(Freedom)
                    > > > socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."( Slavery)
                    > > > Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-59
                    > > >
                    > > > -
                    > > > >
                    > > > >







                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.