Why does Joe need to clarify the message? He felt it was important enough to send, so why would you question it?
Stop asking and start investigating.
----- Original Message ----
From: Joe McGonagle <joe@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 6:54:45 PM
Subject: [UFOnet] Re: Guernsey April 23 2007 report
--- In ufonet@yahoogroups. com, <geoff@...> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> How can you describe this as the final report?
Because that is what it says on the web site: "The complete final report:"
> Who decides that? You?
Why should it be me?
> If not who?
The people who produced the final report - Jean-Francois Baure, David
Clarke, Paul Fuller & Martin Shough
> If it is the final report by the people involved in producing it
then fair enough but that should be stated.
They do state that at the link I provided.
> Unless of course, you are claiming some legal right over research,
then you should declare it.
If I was claiming it, I would declare it.
> Geoff Richardson
> www.thewhyfiles. net
> PS - I will be offline for a while from tomorrow and look forward to
your justification on returning. That is if I am allowed to be
offline, do I need permission from someone to do that?
Did you need permission to post your message 3 times?
I also expect an autoreponse from culturalpolicy@ sparklist. com I have
notified the list moderators about that since I suspect it is an email
address harevesting scam - who runs this list now? anyone?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]