Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

WHO REALLY OWNS THE USA forwarded by D-G:W.

Expand Messages
  • walkerdg@telusplanet.net
    Hello Frits: Here is a supporting article to the claim that the B.A.R. - the Berith Iysh Accredited Registry ( Berith Iysh means covenant of man or contracted
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 2 1:12 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      Hello Frits:
      Here is a supporting article to the claim that the B.A.R. - the Berith Iysh
      Accredited Registry ( Berith Iysh means covenant of man or contracted man, so
      the British Empire is really the contracted man empire ), the ROW-man or
      galley slave empire is the same system taken from the Annunaki sired
      Persian/Babylonian naval based slave sytem. The connection this rather long
      but interesting article does not make is the connection to language. We can
      structure our thoughts and our written language to reflect or even better
      imbed our consciousness within it. This is atually happening as we write,
      right now, right ? Spiral out of the hear, and imbed with the inner ear. The
      vortex/torus geometry is the model to model.

      Best wishes!
      Darren.

      Hi, This is a very interesting read....

      : WHO REALLY OWNS THE USA


      > David Icke in "Tales From The Time Loop" has a similiar article at the
      end.
      > I could not find his orginal work but found this almost exact duplicate.
      > Is this why all the Presidents go to Rome as Bush recently did? Is this
      why
      > they say the Black Pope, the head of the Jesuit Order, rules Rome?
      > http://www.remnantofgod.org/blackpope.htm
      >
      http://www.google.com/custom?q=Black+Pope&sa=Google+Search&cof=LW%3A468%3BL%
      3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fdingo.care-mail.com%2Fc2logos%2Fcare2_468x60.gif%3BGFNT%
      3A000066%3BLH%3A60%3BBGC%3Affffff%3BAH%3Acenter%3BGL%3A0%3BAWFID%
      3A186c8b6331d18984%3B%3BGL%3A0%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.care2.com%
      2F&domains=Care2.com&sitesearch=
      >
      > PLEASE READ AND PASS IT ON
      >
      > Bar Association History & Who Owns the U.S.
      > http://www.worldnewsstand.net/history/BAR.htm
      >
      >
      > Subject: History of "BAR ASSOCIATIONS" The Crown Temple - Secret Society
      of
      > the Third Way Order [14 Pages] {THE REAL AMERICAN HISTORY NOT TAUGHT IN
      > SCHOOLS ON THE 227th ANNIVERSARY OF THE FIRST 4th Of July 1776}
      >
      > History of "BAR ASSOCIATIONS" The Crown Temple Secret Society of the Third
      > Way Order by Rule of Mystery Babylon. The Templars of the Crown. The
      > governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at
      > both federal and local state levels, is owned by the "Crown," which is a
      > private foreign power.
      >
      > Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal
      > Families of Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different "Crown" and is
      > fully exposed and explained below. We are specifically referencing the
      > established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the
      "Crown."
      >
      > From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or
      > Crown Templar, all three being synonymous. First, a little historical
      > background. The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two
      parts:
      > the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and
      > modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The
      > Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and
      > Middle Temples (see below) and is located between Fleet Street and
      Victoria
      > Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices
      at
      > Crown Office Row.
      >
      > This Temple "Church" is outside any Canonical jurisdiction. The Master of
      > the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed (non-public) patent,
      > without induction or institution. All licensed Bar Attorneys - Attorners
      > (see definitions below) ­ in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their
      > solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not. This is
      > simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are
      > signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at
      > the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at
      Chancery
      > Lane behind Fleet Street in London.
      >
      > Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such
      as
      > the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar
      > Association, are franchises to the Crown. The Inns of Court (see below,
      The
      > Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial
      system
      > of the City of London - a sovereign and independent territory which is not
      a
      > part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the
      > 1800's, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to
      > defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people.
      >
      > These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America
      > under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful
      > below). They are known collectively as the "Crown." Their lawyers are
      > actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers. The present Queen of England
      is
      > not the "Crown," as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the
      > Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown
      Temple.
      >
      > The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since
      the
      > reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British
      > Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery. The
      U.S.A.
      > is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us
      it
      > is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple
      > through its bankers and attornies.
      >
      > The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and
      > our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawn broker. The bankers and
      > Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the
      > Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at
      > Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from
      the
      > independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing
      > fraudulent "legal" - but totally unlawful - contracts on the American
      > people.
      >
      > The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders
      by
      > controlling their victim's judiciary. Since the first Chancel of the
      Temple
      > Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system
      by
      > any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was
      > where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded
      that
      > he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta.
      >
      > This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in
      > Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as
      > Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight,
      > Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their
      > origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity
      > (chancery) contracts. "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
      for
      > ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward,
      > but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness." -Matthew
      > 23:27
      >
      > By what authority has the "Crown" usurped the natural sovereignty of the
      > American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides
      > constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner
      > as being "constitutional" when this same Supreme Court is appointed by
      (not
      > elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? Is it any wonder the
      > states and her people have no justice as they dwell upon the land? As you
      > will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple.
      > The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown
      Temple
      > from the independent and sovereign City of London.
      >
      > The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve
      > Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland,
      > the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the
      > International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most
      > importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected
      > his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland.
      >
      > The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all
      the
      > central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world.
      > Definitions You Never Knew:
      >
      > ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant
      to
      > another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to +
      > torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of
      the
      > same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996. ATTORN, v.i. [L.
      > ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service
      > from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or
      > tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      >
      > ESQUIRE, n. [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were
      > anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant
      on
      > a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a
      > knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen,
      to
      > officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law,
      > justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen.
      > In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all
      degrees,
      > from governors down to justices and attorneys. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      >
      > RULE, n. [L. regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or
      > make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or
      > authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or
      regulation
      > to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster's 1828
      > Dictionary RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done,
      > (syn.) a regulation.
      >
      > REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what
      > cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life.
      > -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999. CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true
      > meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys
      to
      > understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal
      > group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code,
      > (syn.) to encode.
      >
      > ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -Newbury House
      > Dictionary ©1999.
      >
      > CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL.
      > cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from
      cortis
      > court. See Court.] 4. A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.] Shak.
      Behind
      > the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged
      > Dictionary.
      >
      > COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign
      prince.
      > 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The
      > tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      > COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The
      > Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
      >
      > TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally
      > belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from
      an
      > apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A
      > student of the law. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      >
      > TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honor of some
      deity.
      > Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the
      > people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the
      > Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court,
      > thus called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They
      > are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      >
      > CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on the
      > Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on
      > the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the
      conservators
      > of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the
      principal
      > temples of the Romans in their colonies.
      >
      > INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college of
      > municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house
      of
      > a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided
      > when he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students of
      law
      > reside and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle
      > Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which
      > young students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied
      > chiefly by attorneys, solicitors, etc.
      >
      > INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an
      > inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster's 1828
      > Dictionary. CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty.
      > There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself.
      >
      > Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a
      denomination
      > of money; as, the English crown. -- Crown land, land belonging to the
      crown,
      > that is, to the sovereign. -- Crown law, the law which governs criminal
      > prosecutions. -- Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal
      > cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to
      invest
      > with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged
      Dictionary.
      >
      > COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people
      > transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to
      > cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the
      > parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the
      Spanish
      > colonies in South America. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      >
      > STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances of
      a
      > being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal,
      > constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to
      other
      > beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      >
      > ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg,
      have
      > nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L.
      > sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1.In a general sense,
      > fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in
      general.
      > 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political
      body;
      > a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State. ESTATE,
      > v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
      >
      > PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters
      > patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper
      > authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or
      > persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of
      > Great Britain grants lands, honors and franchises. PATENT, v.t. To grant
      by
      > patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person.
      >
      > LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law;
      > permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful" properly implies a
      > thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a thing in the form or
      > after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from
      > any court, under color of law, is a "legal" process however defective. ­ A
      > Dictionary of Law 1893.
      >
      > LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the
      > administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal
      > profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in
      > law. Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and "Lawful" to
      > the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more appropriate for conformity to
      > positive rules of law; "Lawful" for accord with ethical principle. "Legal"
      > imports rather that the forms of law are observed, that the proceeding is
      > correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that
      the
      > right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is
      the
      > antithesis of "equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2
      > Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).
      >
      > STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which
      anything
      > is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a treaty
      of
      > place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in statu
      > quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war. -1913
      > Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
      >
      > The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple Globally, all the legalistic
      > scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar
      > Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner
      > Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. These
      Inns/Temples
      > are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power
      in
      > commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early
      > 1200's.
      >
      > The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the
      Inner
      > Temple and Middle Temple. Gray's Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by
      > Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln's Inn received its name from the
      Third
      > Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300). Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar
      > Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated - for a
      > definite and purposeful reason: You can't make claim against a non-entity
      > and a non-being. They are private societies without charters or statutes,
      > and their so-called constitutions are based solely on custom and
      > self-regulation. In other words, they exist as secret societies without a
      > public "front door" unless you're a private member called to their Bar.
      >
      > While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license to
      steal
      > from Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal
      > license to steal from America. This comes about directly via their Bar
      > Association franchises to the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple
      > through the Crown Temple. From THE HISTORY OF THE INN, Later Centuries,
      > [p.6], written by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see
      a
      > direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in
      > America: "Call to the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a
      > pre-requisite to Call at King's Inns until late in the 19th century.
      >
      > In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies
      and
      > from many of the West Indian islands. The Inn's records would lead one to
      > suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston
      who
      > had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of
      > Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its
      > consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812". All
      > Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to
      the
      > Crown Temple in order to be accepted or "called to Bar" at any of the
      King's
      > Inns.
      >
      > Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.
      > It's a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has
      > publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies,
      under
      > solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an
      American
      > Declaration of Independence. This simply means that both parties to the
      > Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. In case
      you
      > don't understand the importance of this, there is no international
      agreement
      > or treaty that will ever be honored, or will ever have lawful effect, when
      > the same party signs as both the first and second parties. It's merely a
      > worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any
      > agreement are actually the same. In reality, the American Declaration of
      > Independence was nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple
      made
      > among its private members.
      >
      > By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars
      who
      > was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King's College in New York
      > City, which was funded by members of the London King's Inns, now named
      > Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private
      > secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution. In May of
      > 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six
      months
      > had completed a three year course of studies, passed his examinations, and
      > was admitted to the New York Bar.
      >
      > Of course, the New York Bar Association was/is a franchise of the Crown
      > Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year's service in Congress during
      the
      > 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City as
      > Alexander Hamilton, Esqr. In February of 1784, he wrote the charter for,
      and
      > became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State's first bank.
      > He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of
      > 1787 at Philadelphia. In a five hour speech on June 18th, he stated "an
      > Executive for life will be an elective Monarch". When all his
      > anti-Federalist New York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in
      protest,
      > he alone signed the Constitution for the United States of America
      > representing New York State, one of the legal Crown States (Colonies).
      >
      > One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the
      people,
      > but a State is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony. This is an
      > example of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple - Middle Templars - have
      > taken control of America since the beginning of our settlements. This is
      > explained in further detail below.
      >
      > Later, as President Washington's U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton alone
      > laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit
      > loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the
      > power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the
      > Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the
      > government and fiscal policies of Great Britain. Americans were fooled
      into
      > believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were
      > independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were
      and
      > still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and
      charters,
      > who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of
      the
      > Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony. Neither the American
      > people nor the Queen of Britain own America.
      >
      > The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have
      sworn
      > their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and
      > their Middle Templar Attornies Rule America through unlawful contracts,
      > unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt
      deceit,
      > all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but "legal", Orders,
      > Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our This is because the Crown
      > Temple holds the land titles and estate also-called "judiciary" in
      > America.deeds to all of North America.
      >
      > The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as "the rule of
      > law". In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown
      > Rule of all nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on
      > November 13, 2001, regarding the "rule of law:" "Our countries are
      embarked
      > on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded on a commitment to the
      > values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of law."- Joint
      Statement
      > by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01,
      > spoken from the White House, Washington D.C.
      >
      > What happened in 1776? "Whoever owns the soil, owns all the way to the
      > heavens and to the depths of the earth." - Old Latin maxim and Roman
      > expression. 1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all
      > Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown
      States.
      > The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was
      > signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it
      > announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal
      name
      > called "States" as direct possessive estates of the Crown (see the
      > definitions above to understand the legal trickery that was done).
      >
      > The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring
      lawful
      > independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown
      > possession is the use of the word "State" to signify a "legal estate of
      > possession." Had this been a document of and by the people, both the
      > Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been
      > written using the word "states". By the use of "State," the significance
      of
      > a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the
      North
      > American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal
      document,
      > signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as
      the
      > Constitution of the United States of America.
      >
      > All "Constitutional Rights" in America are simply those dictated by the
      > Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners)
      through
      > their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States
      > Government. When a "State Citizen" attempts to invoke his
      "constitutional",
      > natural, or common law "rights" in Chancery (equity courts), he is told
      they
      > don't apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of
      > the Rule and Codes of Crown "law".
      >
      > Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount
      > authority of God's Law. The people who comprise the citizenry of a state
      are
      > recognized only within natural and common law as is already established by
      > God's Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action within a State
      > Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognized in that court because
      he
      > doesn't legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized
      in
      > their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a
      corporate
      > or legal entity (a legal fiction).
      >
      > Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters
      within
      > Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man
      > of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State
      > Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no "law" within any Rule or Code). Of
      > course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of the
      Lord
      > of lords, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted
      > into a legal "Person" of fictional "status" (another legal term) in order
      > for their legal - but completely unlawful ­ State Judiciary (Chancery
      > Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts
      > where the decisions of "justice" are decided by 3 "judges". This is a
      direct
      > result of the Crown Temple having invoked their Rule and Code over all
      > judicial courts. "It is held to be a settled Rule, that our courts can not
      > take notice of any title to land not derived from the State or Colonial
      > government, and duly verified by patent." -4 Johns. Rep. 163. Jackson v.
      > Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365. S.P.
      >
      > The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent (see definition above) and
      > Charters (definition below) for all the land (Colonies) of New England by
      > the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is
      > now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and
      > Colonial Governours such a hard time, especially concerning Crown
      taxation,
      > a scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being
      > granted "independence." Remember, the Crown Templars represented both
      > parties to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to
      > see, the latter 1787 U.S. Constitution.
      >
      > To have this "Declaration" recognized by international treaty law, and in
      > order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United
      > States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on
      > September 3, 1783, "between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United
      > States". The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown
      > Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate
      > "United States", the new Crown Temple States (Colonies).
      >
      > Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of
      Paris
      > were. Take particular note to the abbreviation "Esqr." following their
      names
      > (see above definition for ESQUIRE) as this legally signifies "Officers of
      > the King's Courts", which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts.
      > This is the same Crown Templar Title given to Alexander Hamilton (see
      > above).
      >
      > The Crown was represented in signature by "David Hartley, Esqr.", a Middle
      > Templar of the King's Court. Representing the United States (a Crown
      > franchise) by signature was "John Adams, Esqr", "Benjamin Franklin, Esqr."
      > and "John Jay, Esqr." The signatories for the "United States" were also
      > Middle Templars of the King's Court through Bar Association membership.
      >
      > What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown
      Temple
      > was representing both parties to the agreement. What a perfect and
      elaborate
      > scam the people of North America had pulled on them! It becomes even more
      > obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part, "to provide for the
      > Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have been
      > confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects."
      >
      > The Crown Colonies were granted to "persons" and corporations of the Crown
      > Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American
      Colonial
      > land was owned by the Crown. Since 1883, the Crown has been receiving
      > "restitution" from the United States, their incorporated Crown franchisee,
      > because the Crown owns the land through paramount and allodial title as a
      > possessory estate. Now, here's a real catch-all in Article 4: "It is
      agreed
      > that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the
      > recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts
      > heretofore contracted."
      >
      > Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as
      the
      > debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of
      > the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called
      > the legal Crown States. This sounds too good to be true, but these are the
      > facts. The words SCAM and HOODWINKED can't begin to describe what had
      taken
      > place.
      >
      > So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of
      > 1883? In the Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of
      > North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states, "It
      is
      > agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress
      > of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779,
      > 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of
      > livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of
      > the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of
      > his full powers, to wit." That amount equals about $18 million dollars,
      plus
      > interest, that Hamilton's U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown
      > Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by
      an
      > already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire. An additional
      > $6 million dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United States at
      > 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February
      25,
      > 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in
      their
      > debts for payment by future generations of Americans.
      >
      > The Fiscal Agents of Mystery Babylon Since its beginnings, the Temple
      Church
      > at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret society. It was
      built
      > and established by the same Temple Knights who were given their Rule and
      > Order by the Roman Pope. It's very important to know how the British Royal
      > Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how the Crown
      > Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the Roman
      > Church. This all becomes very clear through the Concession Of England To
      The
      > Pope on May 15, 1213. This charter was sworn in fealty by England's King
      > John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the
      > Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same, "I myself
      bearing
      > witness in the house of the Knights Templars."
      >
      > Pay particular attention to the words being used that we have defined
      below,
      > especially charter, fealty, demur, and concession: We wish it to be known
      to
      > all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal, not induced
      > by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will
      and
      > by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God
      and
      > His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church,
      > and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole
      > kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights
      and
      > appurtenances. We perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid
      > lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church,
      > binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar
      manner
      > to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at
      that
      > time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign. we will and
      > establish perpetual obligation and concession from the proper and especial
      > revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms. The Roman church shall receive yearly
      a
      > thousand marks sterling, saving to us and to our heirs our rights,
      liberties
      > and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we
      wish
      > to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our
      successors
      > not to act counter to them. And if we or any one of our successors shall
      > presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come
      to
      > his kingdom, and his senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and
      > this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm.
      >
      > Most who have commented on this charter only emphasize the payments due
      the
      > Pope and the Roman Church. What should be emphasized is the fact that King
      > John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June
      15,
      > 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss
      of
      > the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It says
      > so quite plainly.
      >
      > To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England
      > by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled
      the
      > Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on
      the
      > entire British empire. From that time until today, the English monarchy
      and
      > the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope. The following definitions
      are
      > all taken from Webster's 1828 Dictionary since the meanings have not been
      > perverted for nearly 200 years:
      >
      > FEALTY, n. [L. fidelis.] Fidelity to a lord; faithful adherence of a
      tenant
      > or vassal to the superior of whom he holds his lands; loyalty.Under the
      > feudal system of tenures, every vassal or tenant was bound to be true and
      > faithful to his lord, and to defend him against all his enemies. This
      > obligation was called his fidelity or fealty, and an oath of fealty was
      > required to be taken by all tenants to their landlords. The tenant was
      > called a liege man; the land, a liege fee; and the superior, liege lord.
      >
      > FEE, n. [In English, is loan]. This word, fee, inland, or an estate in
      > trust, originated among the descendants of the northern conquerors of
      Italy,
      > but it originated in the south of Europe. See Feud.] Primarily, a loan of
      > land, an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the
      > grantee on condition of personal service, or other condition; and if the
      > grantee or tenant failed to perform the conditions, the land reverted to
      the
      > lord or donor, called the landlord, or lend-lord, the lord of the loan.
      >
      > A fee then is any land or tenement held of a superior on certain
      conditions.
      > It is synonymous with fief and feud. In the United States, an estate in
      fee
      > or fee simple is what is called in English law an allodial estate, an
      estate
      > held by a person in his own right, and descendible to the heirs in
      general.
      >
      > FEUD, n. [L. fides; Eng. loan.] A fief; a fee; a right to lands or
      > hereditaments held in trust, or on the terms of performing certain
      > conditions; the right which a vassal or tenant has to the lands or other
      > immovable thing of his lord, to use the same and take the profits thereof
      > hereditarily, rendering to his superior such duties and services as belong
      > to military tenure, &c., the property of the soil always remaining in the
      > lord or superior.
      >
      > By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the
      > British- English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all
      > future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land,
      > were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some
      five
      > hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of
      > the Crown as a possession and trust named the "United States."
      >
      > ATTORNING, ppr. Acknowledging a new lord, or transferring homage and
      fealty
      > to the purchaser of an estate.
      >
      > Bar Attorneys have been attorning ever since they were founded at the
      Temple
      > Church, by acknowledging that the Crown and he who holds the Crown is the
      > new lord of the land. Because King John defaulted on the 1213 contract,
      the
      > new Crown (the Crown Temple) had a new lord: The Pope and his Roman
      Church.
      >
      > CHARTER, n. 1. A written instrument, executed with usual forms, given as
      > evidence of a grant, contract, or whatever is done between man and man. In
      > its more usual sense, it is the instrument of a grant conferring powers,
      > rights and privileges, either from a king or other sovereign power, or
      from
      > a private person, as a charter of exemption, that no person shall be
      > empanelled on a jury, a charter of pardon, &c.
      >
      > The charters under which most of the colonies in America were settled,
      were
      > given by the king of England, and incorporated certain persons, with
      powers
      > to hold the lands granted, to establish a government, and make laws for
      > their own regulation. These were called charter- governments. By agreeing
      to
      > the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his fealty
      with
      > Rome and the Pope. What that means is that he lost all rights to the
      > kingdom, and the royal English Crown was turned over by default to the
      Pope
      > and the Roman Church. The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown
      Temple
      > because his Knights established it under his Orders. So also the Temple
      > Banks, the Templar Attorneys, the corporate United States, the corporate
      > British Commonwealth, the chartered Federal Reserve Bank and Bank of
      > England; the list is nearly endless. He who controls the gold controls the
      > world. The Crown Temple Today The workings of the Crown Temple in this day
      > and age is moreso obvious, yet somewhat hidden.
      >
      > The Crown Templars have many names and many symbols to signify their
      private
      > and unholy Temple. Take a close look at the (alleged) one dollar $1
      private
      > Federal Reserve System (a Crown banking franchise) Debt Note. Notice in
      the
      > base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in Roman
      > numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM
      are
      > Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. Go
      back
      > to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words
      CAPITOL,
      > CROWN and TEMPLE.
      >
      > 1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the Crown Temple.
      > That's when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered government
      > called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence. Since
      > that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter) rose
      > up and refers to every nation as a State member. Note also that there are
      13
      > layers for the pyramid denoting the 13 chartered Colony-States and that
      the
      > eye of Osirus, one of many Templar signs used the Temple Illuminati or
      their
      > Order of the Rose and Order of the Cross.
      >
      > The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple This is not a mere child's story
      written
      > by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does "Oz" stand for? Ounces. What is
      measured
      > in ounces? Gold. What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of
      > gold.
      >
      > The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS
      > legal fiction - a PERSON - the Federal U.S. Government created with the
      same
      > spelling as your Christian birth name. Remember what the Straw Man wanted
      > from the Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they
      > have no breath of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A
      Certificate.
      > A Birth Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new
      legal
      > status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the
      true
      > epitome of the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in
      place
      > of a brain of common sense.
      >
      > What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean
      > anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his
      work
      > until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked
      himself
      > to death because he had no heart nor soul. He's the heartless and
      > emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was
      > already dead. He's the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the
      > yoke. These days, his task masters just oil him nightly with beer and
      place
      > him in front of a hypnotic television until his very existence no longer
      has
      > any meaning or value. His masters keep him cold on the outside and
      heartless
      > on the inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold
      > of. The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for
      > himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking
      > on those smaller than he was. Did you ever notice how bullies are really
      the
      > biggest cowards? They act as if they have great courage, but they really
      > have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up.
      When
      > push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered
      > when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from
      > the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of "official" recognition.
      Now,
      > regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made
      > him a bully with officially recognized authority. He's just like the
      > Attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar.
      >
      > What about the trip through the field of poppies? Notice how it never
      > affected the Straw Man (no brain) or the TIN Man (no heart or soul)? They
      > weren't real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was
      > written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known
      > America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug
      cartel
      > game for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium
      > Wars. The Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China
      with
      > drugs, so why not the rest of the world?
      >
      > Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or
      > cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog.
      Toto
      > means "in total, all together; Latin in toto." Notice how Toto was not
      > scared of the Great Wizard's theatrics, yet he was so small in size
      compared
      > to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram
      > images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of
      Oz
      > commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain ­ the court -
      > (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started
      > barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the
      > barking was about.
      >
      > Who was behind the curtain? Just an ordinary person controlling the levers
      > that created the illusions of the Great Wizard's power and authority. When
      > Toto pulled back the curtain to completely expose him, the charade was
      over.
      > The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was
      > removed. The Wizard's game was up. It's too bad that people don't realize
      > how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark?
      >
      > Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and
      > recognition, if any, your legal master gives you? Let's not forget those
      > pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolize the
      Bar
      > Association Attorners who attack and control all the little people for the
      > Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz - Gold. What is
      it
      > going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what
      > they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and
      > courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work
      > together. Only "in toto," working together as one Body of the King of
      Kings,
      > can we ever be free or have the freedom given under God's Law.
      >
      > Mystery Babylon Revealed. There is no mystery behind the current
      abomination
      > of Babylon for those who discern His Truth: And upon her forehead was a
      name
      > written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND
      ABOMINATIONS
      > OF THE EARTH. -Revelation 17:5 God has reserved His judgment for the great
      > idolatress, Rome, the chief seat of all idolatry, that rules over many
      > nations with whom the kings have committed to the worship of her idols
      (see
      > Revelation 17:1-4). The Pope and His purported Church; sitting on the
      Temple
      > throne at the Vatican; ruling the nations of the earth through the Crown
      > Temple of ungodly deities are the Rule and Order of Babylon; the Crown of
      > godlessness and the Code of commerce.
      >
      > One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The New World
      Order
      > (a Bush family favourite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair and Bill
      > Clinton), the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United
      > Nations, the EU, the US, or many dozens of other names. However, they all
      > point to one origin and one beginning.
      >
      > We have traced this in history to the Crown Temple, the Temple Church
      circa
      > 1200. All world banking, judiciary, and rule of "law" has been under the
      > Rule and Order of the Crown Temple since that time. Because the Pope
      created
      > the Order of the Temple Knights (the Grand Wizards of deception) and
      > established their mighty Temple Church in the sovereign City of London, it
      > is the Pope and his Roman Capitols who control the world. "And the woman
      was
      > arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious
      > stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations
      and
      > filthiness of her fornication" -Revelation 17:4 This verse appears to be
      an
      > accurate description of the Pope and His Bishops for the past 1,700 years.
      > The idolatries of commerce in the world: all the gold and silver; the iron
      > and soft metals; the money and coins and riches of the world: All of these
      > are under the control of the Crown Temple; the Roman King and his false
      > Church; the throne of Babylon; attended to by his Templar Knights, the
      > Wizards of abomination and idolatry. "The seven heads are seven mountains,
      > on which the woman [mother of harlots] sitteth" - Revelation 17:9 The only
      > mention of "seven mountains" within our present-day Bible is at Revelation
      > 17:9, so it's no wonder this has been a mystery to the current Body of
      > Christ.
      >
      > The 1611 King James (who was a Crown Templar) Bible is not the entire
      canon
      > of the early church ("church" in Latin ecclesia; in Greek ekklesia). There
      > were other gospels and books that have been forbidden by the Papal Throne
      at
      > Rome since the third century. Greek and Aramaic copies of the "unapproved
      > writings" were sought after and destroyed by Rome. This in itself is no
      > mystery as history records the existence and destruction of these early
      > church writings; just as history has now proven their genuine authenticity
      > with the appearance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the coptic library at Nag
      > Hagmadi in Egypt, among many other recent Greek language discoveries
      within
      > the past 100 years.
      >
      > The current Holy Bible quotes the Book of Enoch numerous times: By faith
      > Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was not found,
      > because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this testimony,
      > that he pleased God. - Hebrews 11:5 Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam,
      > prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten
      > thousands of His saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who
      are
      > ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in
      > an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have
      > spoken against Him." - Jude 1:14-15.
      >
      > The Book of Enoch was considered scripture by most early Christians. The
      > earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers" is filled with
      > references to this mysterious book. The second century Epistle of Barnabus
      > makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church
      > Fathers," such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of
      Alexandria,
      > all make use of the Book of Enoch. Tertullian (160-230 C.E) even called
      the
      > Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The Ethiopic Church included the Book of
      > Enoch to its official canon. It was widely known and read the first three
      > centuries after Christ. However, this and many other books became
      > discredited after the Roman Council of Laodicea. Being under ban of the
      > Roman Papal authorities, afterwards they gradually passed out of
      > circulation.
      >
      > At about the time of the Protestant Reformation, there was a renewed
      > interest in the Book of Enoch, which had long since been lost to the
      modern
      > world. By the late 1400's, rumors began to spread that a copy of the long
      > lost Book of Enoch might still exist. During this time, many books arose
      > claiming to be the lost book but were later found to be forgeries. The
      > return of the Book of Enoch to the modern western world is credited to the
      > famous explorer James Bruce, who in 1773 returned from six years in
      > Abyssinia with three Ethiopic copies of the lost book. In 1821, Richard
      > Laurence published the first English translation. The now famous R.H.
      > Charles edition was first published by Oxford Press in 1912. In the
      > following years, several portions of the Greek text also surfaced. Then,
      > with the discovery of cave number four of the Dead Sea Scrolls, seven
      > fragmentary copies of the Aramaic text were discovered.
      >
      > Within the Book of Enoch is revealed one of the mysteries of Babylon
      > concerning the seven mountains she sits upon (underlining has been added):
      > [CHAPTER 52] 2 There mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven that
      > shall be; a mountain of iron, a mountain of copper, a mountain of silver,
      a
      > mountain of gold, a mountain of soft metal, and a mountain of lead. 6
      These
      > [6] mountains which thine eyes have seen: The mountain of iron, the
      mountain
      > of copper, the mountain of silver, the mountain of gold, the mountain of
      > soft metal, and the mountain of lead. All these shall be in the presence
      of
      > the Elect One as wax: Before the fire, like the water which streams down
      > from above upon those mountains, and they shall become powerless before
      his
      > feet. 7 It shall come to pass in those days that none shall be saved,
      either
      > by gold or by silver, and none be able to escape. 8 There shall be no iron
      > for war, nor shall one clothe oneself with a breastplate. Bronze shall be
      of
      > no service, tin shall be of no service and shall not be esteemed, and lead
      > shall not be desired. 9 All these things shall be denied and destroyed
      from
      > the surface of the earth when the Elect One shall appear before the face
      of
      > the Lord of Spirits.' [CHAPTER 24] 3 The seventh mountain was in the midst
      > of these, and it excelled them in height, resembling the seat of a throne;
      > and fragrant trees encircled the throne. [CHAPTER 25] 3 And he answered
      > saying: 'This high mountain which thou hast seen, whose summit is like the
      > throne of God, is His throne, where the Holy Great One, the Lord of Glory,
      > the Eternal King, will sit, when He shall come down to visit the earth
      with
      > goodness. 4 As for this fragrant tree, no mortal is permitted to touch it
      > until the great judgement when He shall take vengeance on all and bring
      > (everything) to its consummation for ever. 5 It shall then be given to the
      > righteous and Holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the elect: It shall be
      > transplanted to the Holy place, to the temple of the Lord, the Eternal
      King.
      > 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, and into the Holy place
      > shall they enter; its fragrance shall be in their bones and they shall
      live
      > a long life on earth, such as thy fathers lived: In their days shall no
      > sorrow, or plague, or torment, or calamity touch them.'
      >
      > The present wealth and power of all the world's gold, silver, tin, bronze,
      > pearls, diamonds, gemstones, iron, and copper belonging the Babylon whore,
      > and held in the treasuries of her Crown Templar banks and deep stony
      vaults,
      > will not be able to save them at the time of the Lord's judgment. But woe
      > unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of
      > heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye
      > them that are entering to go in. ­ Matthew 23:13
      >
      > Where do we go from here? Now that their false Temple has been exposed,
      how
      > does this apply to the Kingdom of Heaven? To reach the end, you must know
      > the beginning. For everything ordained of God, there is an imitation
      > ordained of evil that looks like the genuine thing. There is the knowledge
      > of good and the knowledge of evil. The problem is, most believe they have
      > the knowledge of God when what they really have is knowledge of world
      > deceptions operating as gods. Where there is the true Tabernacle or Temple
      > of God, there are also the false Temples of unholy gods. The only way to
      > discern and begin to understand the Kingdom of Heaven is to seek the
      > Knowledge that comes only from God, not the knowledge of men who take
      their
      > legal claim as earthly rulers and gods.
      >
      > The false Crown Temple and its Grand Wizard Knights have led the world to
      > believe that they are of the Lord God and hold the knowledge and keys to
      His
      > Kingdom. What they hold within their Temples are the opposite. They claim
      to
      > be the "Holy Church," but which holy church? The real one or the false
      one?
      > Are the Pope and his Roman Church the Temple of God, or is this the unholy
      > Temple of Babylon sitting upon the seven mountains? They use the same
      words,
      > but alter them to show the true meaning they have applied: The State is
      not
      > a state; a Certificate is not a certification. The Roman Church is not the
      > church (ekklesia). There is the Crown of the Lord; and a Crown of that
      which
      > is not of the Lord. There is the mark and seal of the Lord God; and there
      > are the Marks and Seals of the false gods. All imitations appear to be the
      > genuine article, but they are fakes.
      >
      > Those who are truly seeking the genuine Kingdom of God must allow the Lord
      > to show them the discernment between the genuine and the imitation.
      Without
      > this discernment by the Holy Spirit, all will remain fooled by the
      illusions
      > of false deity emanating from the unholy spirits of the Wizards. Neither
      > shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom of God is
      > within you. - Luke 17:21 Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look,
      the
      > (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede
      > you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede
      you.
      > Rather, the FATHER'S kingdom is within you and it is outside you. ­ Gospel
      > of Thomas 3 Don't you know that you are the temple of God, and that the
      > Spirit of God lives in you? ­ 1 Corinthians 3:16 Jesus said, "Know what is
      > in front of your face, and what is hidden from you will be disclosed to
      you.
      > For there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed. [And there is
      nothing
      > buried that will not be raised."] ­ Gospel of Thomas 5
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Wisdom And Freedom produced by WORLD NEWSSTAND
      > Copyright © 2002. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
      > page image by Terri Williams
      >
      > _________________________________________________________________
      >>



      ----- End forwarded message -----
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.