Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Argentina: Many Believe Mutilations Phenom Will Never Be Explained

Expand Messages
  • SHnSASSY1@aol.com
    Subj: Argentina: Many Believe Mutilations Phenom Will Never Be Explained Date: 7/1/2002 11:14:06 AM Eastern Standard Time From:
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 1, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      Subj: Argentina: Many Believe Mutilations Phenom Will Never Be Explained
      Date: 7/1/2002 11:14:06 AM Eastern Standard Time
      From: <A HREF="mailto:lornis1@...">lornis1@...</A>

      SOURCE: Diario La Nueva Provincia (Bahia Blanca, Argentina)
      DATE: June 30, 2002

      MANY BELIEVE MUTILATIONS PHENOM WILL NEVER BE EXPLAINED
      **The guidelines for unravelling the discovery of mutilated animals**

      Animals with strange incisions keep appearing. However, since there is
      already an official theory on the subject (the bovines died of natural causes
      and were later attacked by scavengers), it is unlikely that investigations
      into the matter will continue. Even as more claims against the version put
      forth by the government become known, two specialists from Bahia are
      detailing the guidelines to be followed in shedding light on the subject.

      Alien researchers, brutal attacks by carnivorous wasps, first world
      scientists interested in finding ailments in the bovines of the Pampas,
      macabre cultic rituals and even perverse CIA experiments: all of this was
      said in the past 25 days in an effort to explain the mutilations in our
      region, but the fact is that very little has been done to find an explanation
      that will satisfy most of the population, at least.

      Not even the official version--which speaks of animals dying of natural
      causes and being mutilated by carrion animals--is convincing to ranchers who
      have experienced the mutilation of their cattle, some of which have seen
      circular incisions or in 90 degree angles, different to what any known wild
      animal can make. The fact remains that the official theory--offered by
      specialists from the Schools of Veterinary Medicine of Rosario, Tandil and La
      Plata--shall remain standing from now on, even though more animals turn up
      with wounds as brutal as they are strange, and huge water tanks emptied in a
      single night and strange lights in the sky continue to occur. Unless, of
      course, that an investigation such as the one proposed by Elsa Mensch and
      Liliana Arró, both in charge of the Chair of Investigation Methodology of the
      Higher Insitutie of Communication Sciences of Bahía Blanca, have proposed.

      These professionals, consulted by La Nueva Provincia, mentioned that before
      anything else, an interdisciplinary team to approach the subject from various
      angles must be constituted. "It would be idealt to have biologists,
      anthropologists, geologists, pathologists, veterinarians, and why not,
      persons knowledgeable in paranormal or folkloric matters, among others, "
      said Mensch. "Furthermore, a specialist in methodology should be present,
      checking step by step in order to offer no false results," added Arro.

      Both stated that an investigation also implies being very careful and
      critical, abandoning beliefs or personal values in order to work with data
      that can be scientifically attested.

      Regarding the hypotheses to be discussed, Arro pointed out that prior to
      creating new ones, consideration must be given to historic ones: in other
      words, those which were formulated years ago in other countries in which
      similar phenomena have occured. "Many hypotheses were put forth in the U.S.
      and Mexico which were neither confirmed nor denied, except for two. It would
      be necessary to review that research, since a long time has gone by."

      "At the time it was confirmed, for example, that the incisions were not made
      with materials known at the time (the '70s and '80s). This may have changed
      today, because technology has progressed considerably and it is perhaps
      possible now to find out what they were made with." According to her
      perspective, it its important to reject hypotheses that have already been
      disproven so as not to confuse the public or the researchers themselves. "As
      regards new hypotheses, the subject of water disappearances would have to be
      included. How can we understand the fact that liquid vanished, leaving the
      tanks completely dry?, " she asks.

      "Likewise, it is necessary to work with people who understand soils and can
      look into the possible tracks that may have been left around the animals." To
      Arró, it is obvious that one must point toward the verifiable with scientific
      hypotheses and not fantasy. "There exists physical, palpable data surrounding
      these cases whose existence does not depend on whether the researcher
      believes in them or not. Such is the case of the soil on which the bovines
      were found. This data must be analyzed rigorously and under stringent
      methodological control."

      Mensch opined that after establishing goals and the research stages on the
      cases, a theoretical model must be furthered which would allow obtaining
      reliable and interesting data regarding the mutilations. "This is
      particularly hard in the cases presented, because there are few scientific
      studies on the matter. In any case, an effort should be made to find reports
      which could address part of the case, or photos, reports and other things.
      Interviews with trained persons can also be performed," she added. "The more
      unknown the phenomenon is, there more people would have to be added to the
      investigation. No hypothesis can be formulated without taking all of the
      elements compiled into consideration."

      In regard to the fact that many hypotheses have been put forth and none has
      been satsifactorily confirmed in the minds of the people, Mensch stated that
      this does not necessarily mean that the cases have to do with supernatural
      matters. "In fact, the absence of satisfactory explanations can be due to the
      fact that the correct hypothesis has not been formulated." She also mentioned
      that the appearance of explanations having little to do with scientific
      hypotheses may have hindered the investigations. "These are mere efforts by
      persons, who cast a stone, so to speak, to see what happens, and respond to
      how people react or believe. The scientific method, when seriously applied,
      can be used on any discipline, even the study of the UFO phenomenon. But not
      everyone who calls himself a reseacher is actually one."

      "Regarding cases like these, many journalists and alleged experts have
      appeared on TV which theories explained in such a way that many of them are
      based on belief. Caution is called for. I have not heard that the subject has
      been approached form a strictly scientific standpoint," she added.

      Arró also made reference to the subject and considered that in a more normal
      social context that can be found in Argentina a this time, it would be
      necessary to ask who would benefit from the subject of mutilated cows being
      resolved in one way or another.

      "Days ago, I was watching a program called Memoria (hosted by Samuel Gelblung
      on Canal Azul) and every other moment there was a new wild hypothesis on the
      subject, but no answers were being given. Furthermore, the silent gaps were
      highly suggestive and the persons doing the talking were not serious
      specialists but opinion-givers. At one point I wondered if those programs had
      agreements with the government, since rather than provide information, they
      supply disinformation."

      In closing, she recalled an axiom which to her understanding must always be
      kept in mind: Science does not care what is true, only what can be
      demostrated.

      "There are great truths that cannot be demostrated," Arró explained. "Such
      was the case with quantum physics. Einstein realized at the age of 12 that
      Physicas, as he knew it, was wrong. However, he couldn't prove it until he
      was 46 or 47. Before Einstein, in spite of the fact that there was no one to
      discover it, the Truth was the same, unique and irreplaceable."

      =====================================================
      Translation (C) 2002. Scott Corrales, Institute of Hispanic Ufology. Special
      Thanks to Gloria Coluchi.



      <A HREF="http://www.worldofthestrange.com/">World Of The Strange Newsletter</A> http://www.worldofthestrange.com
      <A HREF="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/para-discuss">#1 Discussion List Para-Discuss</A> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/para-discuss
      <A HREF="http://www.godlikeproductions.com/worldofthestrange/">World of the Strange Message Board</A>
      http://www.godlikeproductions.com/worldofthestrange/


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.