Fwd = If Life Exists On Mars, Our Robotic Probes May Have Brought It There
- Forwarded by: fwestra@... (Frits Westra)
Original Date: 2 Oct 2001 06:07:37 -0000
========================== Forwarded message begins ======================
If Life Exists On Mars, Our Robotic Probes May Have Brought It There
by Laura Woodmansee
Pasadena - Oct 1, 2001
The results of NASA's 1976 Viking lander missions were largely
inconclusive. But, what if our spacecraft brought tiny forms of Earth
life to Mars? Could it have survived there? If so, what does this mean
for the future exploration of Mars?
And there is Europa, probably the most likely source of
extra-terrestrial life in our solar system. NASA has plans to send an
orbiter and then a lander to search for signs of life in Europa's
planet-wide ocean. What is being done to protect Europan life?
How can we seek out life in the solar system without harming it? Can
robotic probes built on Earth be made clean enough to search for life
on other planets without contaminating it? If we bring samples of
alien life back to Earth, how do we prevent them from contaminating
"Planetary protection" is the prevention of "cross contamination."
That is, preventing life from getting from one planet to another and
causing harm. It's an important factor in space exploration that the
public is barely aware of, but one that NASA spends a lot of time
Dr. Karen Buxbaum, a supervisor of the Jet Propulsion Lab's (JPL)
Planetary Protection Technologies Group says, "There's a certain
amount of responsibility that we have as an agency that's doing
exploration to not be sort of reckless in dumping stuff in other parts
of the solar system."
NASA divides planetary protection concerns into two categories;
forward and backward contamination.
Backward contamination is the type of thing that books and movies like
H.G. Wells' "War of the Worlds" and Michael Crichton's "The Andromeda
Strain" have made popular. It is the contamination of Earth life by
alien spores, microbes or organisms.
Science fiction has put the fear of contamination by alien life in our
minds. But, what about the reverse? Could our space probes be
"infecting" other worlds with Earth life?
It turns out that NASA is working to protect life on other worlds from
Earth life, what the space agency calls forward contamination. Buxbaum
defines it this way; "Forward contamination refers to contamination of
other solar system bodies with biological material from the Earth."
But, this concern for alien life remains largely unknown to the
Should we care if we spread Earth life to other planets in our solar
system, or anywhere else? NASA cares and that's why the agency has
spent over 30 (1967-2001) years and countless dollars trying to
prevent cross contamination.
Protecting life on other planets is important business for NASA. It is
crucial to the exploration of the solar system. So much so that NASA
has created an entire Planetary Protection branch. Dr. John Rummel,
NASA's Planetary Protection Officer, works to protect life on Earth
and life elsewhere based on NASA's planetary protection policy.
"The policy is actually based on the desire to preserve
extraterrestrial environments for the science opportunities that are
there," says Rummel.
In other words, if we bring Earth life with us to another planet,
there is the chance that we may kill or harm indigenous life. Or, we
may make it harder to determine if life ever existed there. We may
mistake Earth life for alien life.
"It's in nobody's best interest to obscure that by contamination with
Earth organisms," says Rummel. "Nor would you want to discover a
wonderful new life form and know that you've killed it Essentially we
can meet ethical considerations by the desire to preserve science."
Rummel must approve every NASA space probe before launch. "I often
imagine myself strapped to a booster somewhere," Rummel says in a
comic voice," 'Now, you won't launch this unless you get my
The search for life beyond the Earth has lead to the new science of
Astrobiology. Through a combination of many physical and life
sciences, astrobiologists seek out life elsewhere in the solar system
and the universe. It's important to know where life might be in order
to understand where it must be protected. Scientists are only now
starting to understand the so-called "habitable zone," the range of
environments where life can exist.
Rummel ties astrobiology to planetary protection saying, "The idea of
astrobiology [is] to study the origin, evolution, and distribution of
life in the universe. And its extremely complementary on one level
with planetary protection, in that by preserving the environments in
outer space, you give yourself the potential to be able to discover
more about them."
On Earth, where there is water, there is life. But life doesn't need
water to survive. In the past decade, scientists have discovered
"extremophiles", organisms that live in the limits of the Earth's
environment. Scientists have found life near hydrothermal vents at the
bottom of the ocean, deep inside solid rock, and even at the core of
"One of the things that's changed in biology," Rummel says, "Is we've
found life in extreme environments on Earth, that are completely
different from anything you or I would be comfortable living in.
Nevertheless, there would be ample opportunity to have life there. I
don't want to live in a boiling pool in the middle of Yellowstone
Park, but there are microbes that just love it."
Astronomers have found all the necessary ingredients for life (water,
carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen) inside clouds of gas and dust
floating in deep space. At last count, our solar system has one star,
the Sun, 9 planets with 68 moons, and thousands of comets and
asteroids. It's quite possible that life arose in at least one of
Detecting life is difficult, and scientists must be careful not to
confuse Earth life with alien life. This would risk ruining future
life detection experiments. Karen Buxbaum says, "Confusing the
scientific results is a threat to the program."
In the near future, NASA plans to use astrobiology to search for life
on Mars again. JPL scientist Dr. Roger Kern is planning for such a
mission. "What we anticipate will happen with the first landers on
Mars is there will be life detection experiments done in-situ, at the
site," says Kern. "And those experiments are probably not going to be
looking for life, per se, but will be looking for molecules associated
with life. So we want to remove as much [Earth life] as possible."
Kern continues, "Where as once NASA was only concerned with
sterilizing spacecraft and making sure that the spacecraft couldn't
shed a live organism, now we have an interest in seeing to it that it
doesn't shed a dead organism as well it kind of takes you into a new
definition of clean."
Even with super clean spacecraft, some microbes will always get by.
Dr. Rummel says that the current planetary protection plan includes,
"An inventory of organic constituents that might be delivered to
another body. So that if you happen to go back there and find these
things you know that you brought them."
In preparing a spacecraft for launch, technicians take samples of any
microbes, spores, or cells on the spacecraft's surfaces. They work to
reduce the number of contaminants to as low as possible, cleaning
several times if needed.
Part 2: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01zg2.html
========================== Forwarded message ends ========================