Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Consensus Grows On Climate Change

Expand Messages
  • Light Eye
    Dear Friends, Click the link if you don t receive the images. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4761804.stm Love and Light. David Consensus grows on climate
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 1, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Friends,

      Click the link if you don't receive the images.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4761804.stm

      Love and Light.

      David

      Consensus grows on climate change

      By Roger Harrabin
      Environment Correspondent, BBC News



      Glacier loses its snout

      Enlarge Image

      The global scientific body on climate change will report soon that only greenhouse gas emissions can explain freak weather patterns. Simultaneous changes in sea ice, glaciers, droughts, floods, ecosystems, ocean acidification and wildlife migration are taking place. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had previously said gases such as CO2 were "probably" to blame. Its latest draft report will be sent to world governments next month. A source told the BBC: "The measurements from the natural world on all parts of the globe have been anomalous over the past decade. "If a few were out of kilter we wouldn't be too worried, because the Earth changes naturally. But the fact that they are virtually all out of kilter makes us very concerned." He said the report would forecast that a doubling of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere would bring a temperature rise of 2-4.5C, or maybe higher. This is an increase on projections in the last IPCC
      report, which suggested that the rise could be as little as 1.5C. Uncertainties remain The scientists will say there is still great uncertainty about the pace and scope of future change, although by the end of the century global temperatures could increase by up to 5.8C. The doubling of CO2 from pre-industrial stable levels (270 parts per million) is expected to happen around the middle of the century. Extreme weather events indicate man-made change, the IPCC says

      What really worries the scientists is that we are already seeing major disruptions despite having increased CO2 by just 30%. A recent scientific report commissioned by the UK government warned that the world might already be fixed on a path that would begin melting the Greenland ice cap. That in turn would start raising sea levels throughout the world. There will be sceptics, predominantly in the US, who will accuse the IPCC of trying to scare policy-makers into action with their report. But the broad international expert consensus embodied in the IPCC will make it harder for the US administration to say that climate change is a problem for the future which can be solved by technological advances. In a meeting with climate campaigners, UK Prime Minister Tony Blair said the world needed to engage the Americans, Chinese and Indians in agreement over a figure for CO2 stabilisation. But this is unlikely to happen while US President George W Bush is in office; his
      representative told the December climate conference in Montreal that the US would not agree any targets for reducing CO2. President Bush's chief adviser, James Connaughton, said recently that it was pointless discussing a safe CO2 level, as we could not be sure how resistant the world would be to greenhouse gases. Maybe we could double CO2 with impunity, or maybe we could increase it threefold or fourfold; the issue was not worth discussing, he said. Targets and timetables needed Mr Blair echoed President Bush's call for new technologies to combat climate change. But both men were told by international business leaders last year that more expensive new technologies would not supplant cheap dirty technologies unless governments set binding targets and timetables for reducing greenhouse gases, which the US has rejected. There is little sign of President Bush changing direction on climate

      The prime minister confirmed that his long-delayed climate strategy review would be published this month, and would strive to meet his unilateral target of cutting Britain's CO2 emissions by 20% by 2010. BBC News has been told that the central policy in the review, the CO2 cut for big business, is still being contested, with the prime minister's industry adviser Geoffrey Norris urging a more lax target than the one demanded by the environment department Defra. Central figures in the review process are now admitting that the 20% target will be virtually impossible to hit, and are looking for a "respectable" near miss. The definition of "respectable" is still under ferocious debate.




      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Jahnets
      Isn t that about 30 degrees farenheit? ... From: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Light Eye Sent: Wednesday,
      Message 2 of 2 , Mar 1, 2006
      • 0 Attachment
        Isn't that about 30 degrees farenheit?



        -----Original Message-----
        From: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
        [mailto:ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Light Eye
        Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:08 AM
        To: global_rumblings@yahoogroups.com; Global_Rumblings@...;
        SpeakIt@...; ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com;
        changingplanetchat@yahoogroups.com; astrosciences@yahoogroups.com;
        GS5555@...; giuliano.marinkovic@...;
        wayfarer9@...; parascience@...
        Subject: [ufodiscussion] Consensus Grows On Climate Change


        Dear Friends,

        Click the link if you don't receive the images.

        http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4761804.stm

        Love and Light.

        David

        Consensus grows on climate change

        By Roger Harrabin
        Environment Correspondent, BBC News



        Glacier loses its snout

        Enlarge Image

        The global scientific body on climate change will report soon that only
        greenhouse gas emissions can explain freak weather patterns.
        Simultaneous changes in sea ice, glaciers, droughts, floods, ecosystems,
        ocean acidification and wildlife migration are taking place. The
        Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had previously said gases such as
        CO2 were "probably" to blame. Its latest draft report will be sent to
        world governments next month. A source told the BBC: "The measurements
        from the natural world on all parts of the globe have been anomalous over
        the past decade. "If a few were out of kilter we wouldn't be too
        worried, because the Earth changes naturally. But the fact that they are
        virtually all out of kilter makes us very concerned." He said the
        report would forecast that a doubling of greenhouse gas concentrations in
        the atmosphere would bring a temperature rise of 2-4.5C, or maybe higher.
        This is an increase on projections in the last IPCC
        report, which suggested that the rise could be as little as 1.5C.
        Uncertainties remain The scientists will say there is still great
        uncertainty about the pace and scope of future change, although by the end
        of the century global temperatures could increase by up to 5.8C. The
        doubling of CO2 from pre-industrial stable levels (270 parts per million) is
        expected to happen around the middle of the century. Extreme
        weather events indicate man-made change, the IPCC says

        What really worries the scientists is that we are already seeing major
        disruptions despite having increased CO2 by just 30%. A recent
        scientific report commissioned by the UK government warned that the world
        might already be fixed on a path that would begin melting the Greenland ice
        cap. That in turn would start raising sea levels throughout the world.
        There will be sceptics, predominantly in the US, who will accuse the IPCC of
        trying to scare policy-makers into action with their report. But the
        broad international expert consensus embodied in the IPCC will make it
        harder for the US administration to say that climate change is a problem for
        the future which can be solved by technological advances. In a meeting
        with climate campaigners, UK Prime Minister Tony Blair said the world needed
        to engage the Americans, Chinese and Indians in agreement over a figure for
        CO2 stabilisation. But this is unlikely to happen while US President
        George W Bush is in office; his
        representative told the December climate conference in Montreal that the
        US would not agree any targets for reducing CO2. President Bush's chief
        adviser, James Connaughton, said recently that it was pointless discussing a
        safe CO2 level, as we could not be sure how resistant the world would be to
        greenhouse gases. Maybe we could double CO2 with impunity, or maybe we
        could increase it threefold or fourfold; the issue was not worth discussing,
        he said. Targets and timetables needed Mr Blair echoed President
        Bush's call for new technologies to combat climate change. But both men
        were told by international business leaders last year that more expensive
        new technologies would not supplant cheap dirty technologies unless
        governments set binding targets and timetables for reducing greenhouse
        gases, which the US has rejected. There is little sign of
        President Bush changing direction on climate

        The prime minister confirmed that his long-delayed climate strategy review
        would be published this month, and would strive to meet his unilateral
        target of cutting Britain's CO2 emissions by 20% by 2010. BBC News has
        been told that the central policy in the review, the CO2 cut for big
        business, is still being contested, with the prime minister's industry
        adviser Geoffrey Norris urging a more lax target than the one demanded by
        the environment department Defra. Central figures in the review process
        are now admitting that the 20% target will be virtually impossible to hit,
        and are looking for a "respectable" near miss. The definition of
        "respectable" is still under ferocious debate.




        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



        SPONSORED LINKS Extraterrestrial life Paranormal phenomena


        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        --
        YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

        a.. Visit your group "ufodiscussion" on the web.

        b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        ufodiscussion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

        c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
        Service.


        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        --



        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.