Science and earth
- What could have been done in ten years...Sad huh...
An earlier lake sediment study co-authored by Drs. Douglas and Smol,
published in the journal Science in 1994, caused controversy with its
interpretation of climatic warming in three high Arctic ponds. Now, says Dr.
Smol, "the tide has turned, and some of the strongest skeptics of that 1994
study are co-authors on this paper."
Just think these skeptics have held us back for ten years... Maybe if there
is a law put in place that any scientist working for the public has to
meditate for at least an hour a day???
Very comprehensive article about warming I think showing both sides...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]