Re: [ufodiscussion] RE: [prepare4contact] Re: [ufos-unbound] Large Sphere Near The Sun
- "The problem is what is a Planet X."
I quite agree. It seems that the label refers to radically
different things in different people's minds. To conventional astronomers
it refers to a so-far undiscovered planet that orbits the sun in the outer
reaches of the solar system beyond the orbit of Pluto. To Nancy Lieder and
her followers it apparently refers to a large planetary body that they
believe entered the inner solar system in 2003 and is still inside it
although its existence is being covered up by the political authorities on
earth. Some people say it is Sitchin's planet Nibiru, some say it is a
brown dwarf (which is sort of mid-way between a planet and a star) and some
say it is a red dwarf (not a planet at all and actually a small star). And
now Dex has suggested that Planet X could be an artificial "bio-satellite".
There are a lot of disparate ideas to reconcile here for anyone who
may wish to produce a single, coherent, definitive answer to the question
"What is Planet X?". That is not really a project that attracts me though.
I am more interested in the psychosocial phenomenon of a group of people
arising at this time in world history who are choosing to believe in the
physical presence of a celestial object which they are calling Planet X and
choosing to believe too that this cosmic intruder is threatening the earth
with a cataclysmic pole shift in or around the year 2012AD. In spite of
their vagueness and indeterminacy about what and where Planet X is exactly,
they do appear to have a semi-coherent body of shared belief about it and
therefore, although their idea of Planet X is not a part of the commonly
accepted public-domain reality that most people believe in, apparently it is
real to them. The question in my mind is, Why?
I think this question is important from a sociological point of view
because the idea of Planet X is a revolutionary one. I say this because it
stands in conflict with the established notion of physical reality in which
most people already believe and to which global human society is stolidly
committed. Planet X does not conform to the accepted laws of our
established reality and therefore belief in Planet X is not compatible with
belief in established physical reality. In order for the world to accept
the existence of Planet X the world's prior belief in its established
physical reality would have to be overturned. This, in my view, is what
makes the Planet X proposition as revolutionary as Galileo's proposition
that the earth went around the sun.
The Galilean Revolution succeeded because Galileo's proposition
proved to be more in accord with the observed behaviour of the heavenly
bodies than the old Ptolemaic belief system was. It was the "look-and-see"
principle in action. But the Planet X adherents have denied themselves the
same opportunity for physical proof because part of their belief system is
that the physical evidence for Planet X's existence is unavailable for
public inspection since it is being effectively covered up. Furthermore
Nancy Lieder's group maintain that they themselves do not want the general
public to have such a form of proof although their reasons for this are not
clear to me. Yet, whatever their reasons, the bottom line appears to be
that for the general public at large no physical evidence and no physical
form of proof for Planet X's existence can exist.
It is possible - even natural perhaps - to wonder how that group can
possibly hope in their wildest dreams that any but the most gullible of
sapheads would subscribe to their physically-unprovable belief system. But
again I am not interested in that question. I am interested in
understanding why they believe what they are choosing to believe. What is
their belief in Planet X doing for them? Just calling them "gullible
sapheads" does not really answer that question. Clearly they are people who
are willing to believe in Planet X in the complete absence of any physical
proof of its existence and even in the presence of physical evidence which
contradicts its existence. To the normal public who adhere to the belief in
the established physical reality they appear to be indulging in a fantasy
and I would say that they must be doing so anyway because the common human
world that we call "reality" is made essentially out of fantasy. It is
whatever we care to imagine and believe in at the same time. And people are
free to indulge in all sorts of fantasies on the internet so it should not
surprise anyone to find that this is what people actually do on it. But why
this particular fantasy? What is its appeal to its subscribers? What need
or desire in them is it satisfying?
I shall not attempt to answer these questions here and now as they
are too big and deep to permit any quick or simple answers. I will just
mention for now that the symbolic approach of depth psychology provides a
possible inroad into the mystery. For example, one could ask why Planet X
is conceived to be a red dwarf. Why red? And why a "dwarf"? What part of
the human spiritual/psychic anatomy does this symbolise? And how and why do
these believers find it such a formidible threat to their world.
I suppose that in sum what I am trying to get at is simply that not
only is the Planet X-scenario an extraordinary idea but also the people who
believe in it must possess an extraordinary psychology too. And because
belief in Planet X is incompatible with conventional belief in established
"physical reality", their extraordinary psychology could form the basis for
an evolutionary divergence occurring at some future time in the human
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:49 AM
Subject: [ufodiscussion] RE: [prepare4contact] Re: [ufos-unbound] Large
Sphere Near The Sun
All legitimate opinions..I agree basically with many of them and others I
have know way of knowing how to refute them. I don't think it's people's
imagination, I feel it's just something we don't know about yet.
The problem is what is a Planet X. Is it a bio-satellite world? Is it
artificially constructed? As we approach an area in space changing density
do we phase too closely to what was invisible and now manifesting visibly
because we begin corresponding vibrantly to a world during the shift that
causes a magnetic/gravational disruption engendering a polar flip, thus,
fulfilling the Prophecy's related?
Or are speaking of a Null Zone according to Jim Hurtak, and mistakenly
interpreting it as the Planet X in space.
We'll find out soon enough.
I believe it's a controlled scenario wrapping up these cyclical changes that
allegedly re-positions' our star system nearer the center of our galaxy and
placing us within a 5th dimensional wavelength of time. A different time
cell that require's vibrational corresponding bodies.
If many of us are to survive, this may help us understand why the tampering
with our bodies.
We're being given choice's to stay or leave for other worlds and working
aboard ships in space and it's true, some won't require physical forms to
continue their spiritual journey. All this has been communicated to me
directly. It's important for people to believe or it may limit the potential
attainment we can acquire during this opportunity time of changes.