Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [ufodiscussion] Re: ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction [11-08-08]

Expand Messages
  • masanga@talktalk.net
    Dear Nathaniel, Thank you for your email begging my pardon. I gladly give it to you. I did not take your reaction to my comments about Obama personally and
    Message 1 of 22 , Nov 17, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Nathaniel,

      Thank you for your email begging my pardon. I gladly give it to
      you. I did not take your reaction to my comments about Obama personally and
      no harm was done.

      Be at peace.

      Regan (masanga)


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: nathaniel x vance
      To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 4:57 PM
      Subject: [ufodiscussion] Re: ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction [11-08-08]


      Dear Brother masanga,
      Please pardon me for being a bit heavy handed. You sound very well adept
      and refreshing in your last two posts! I like your messages now, but how
      you questioned my use of the word " COMMISSIONED" really brought the
      rebellion out in me.
      Maybe I should have said or used that Sen. B Obama was "HIGHLY
      COMMISSIONED" and added that he is NOT an ordinary soul or something
      like that alone those lines. Please pardon me as I have no degrees in
      higher education and only am doing the best little that I can to try and
      help to spread the word that our earthly planet is undergoing a Divine
      renaissance for the better under God and His space angels into another
      higher spiritual dimension where true brotherly and sisterly love and
      co-existence will be the order of the future!
      Please pardon me.

      --- In ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com, <masanga@...> wrote:
      >
      > Nathaniel,
      >
      > Thank you for wishing me well. I wish you well too.
      >
      > You say that I cannot be the same "masanga" who spoke to you
      about
      > Barack Obama and that I must have multiple personalities. Since you
      know of
      > me only from what you have read on your computer-screen, I am to you
      > whatever you imagine and believe me to be and if you say I must have
      > multiple personalities then I accept that, in your subjective
      universe, I
      > must have them. I can only tell you that in my subjective universe I
      have
      > only one personality and leave you to make of that what you will.
      >
      > Regarding Obama, I was not denying that he has a special
      divine
      > commission. I was merely saying that I believe we all have them. I
      > acknowledge that he is qualified to accept his commission. However,
      in my
      > view that does not necessarily mean he will actually fulfil it, only
      that he
      > can fulfil it if he dedicates himself to doing so.
      >
      > But what is his divine commission exactly? I would not
      presume to
      > know that unless I heard him state it and since he hasn't done that to
      date
      > it is a mystery to me. However, I am content for it to remain a
      mystery to
      > me since it is a matter between him and the Divine and is none of my
      > business really. I have enough on my plate just fulfilling my own
      divine
      > commission without concerning myself with his too.
      >
      > Regan (masanga)
      >
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: nathaniel x vance
      > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 2:39 PM
      > Subject: [ufodiscussion] Re: ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction [11-08-08]
      >
      >
      > masanga,
      > Whoever wrote this post must not be the masanga who wrote to me about
      > what Commission means with regards to president-elect Obama! This
      > masanga person is sane and talks with kindness and forthrightness. If
      > you are masanga, then you must have multiple personalities???
      > At any rate, I wish you well.
      >
      > --- In ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com, masanga@ wrote:
      > >
      > > Nathaniel,
      > >
      > > I appreciate that you have tried to insult me by suggesting
      > that my
      > > mental level is that of a 2 year-old child but I take it as a very
      > great
      > > compliment from your unconscious. You see, normal two year-olds have
      > > extremely clear, unobstructed minds that are uncluttered by false
      > knowledge,
      > > unbiased by prejudgements and preconceptions, unsullied by strange
      > desires,
      > > and undisturbed by fears of pain and loss. These innocents see
      things
      > as
      > > they truly are in themselves and their actions express the cosmic
      will
      > > automatically and spontaneously. The famous abstract artist Picasso
      > said
      > > that it took him until he was sixty to learn to paint like a child.
      > And
      > > Jesus himself no less is supposed to have said: "Suffer little
      > children to
      > > come unto me, for of such is the kingdom of God made." So I thank
      you
      > for
      > > this unexpected and unsolicited recognition, Nathaniel. I have
      worked
      > long
      > > and hard to get into this child-like state and your compliment is
      both
      > > confirmation to me that my efforts have not been in vain and
      > encouragement
      > > to continue them further. With help from above I hope to get my
      > mental age
      > > down to absolute zero in time.
      > >
      > > I am sorry to hear though that you are feeling the need for a
      > break
      > > from me and that you want me not to reply to you. Sorry, but if you
      > don't
      > > want me to reply then I think you should not address your posts to
      me
      > in the
      > > first place. And if my posts are bugging you anyway then I can only
      > suggest
      > > that you stop reading them because I have no intention of shutting
      up.
      > >
      > > Sincerely,
      > > Regan (masanga)
      > >
      > >
      > > ----- Original Message -----
      > > From: nathaniel x vance
      > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 2:28 PM
      > > Subject: [ufodiscussion] Re: ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction [11-08-08]
      > >
      > >
      > > Dear masanga,
      > > I know that you are not capable of using much logic, but I will
      answer
      > > your question: The Space Shuttle took off last night with a crew of
      > > seven. If NASA came up to you and said, please Mr. masanga, one of
      our
      > > crew is sick and we like to COMMISSION you to take his place, what
      > would
      > > your answer be?
      > > Knowing you, you will miss the point. What I am saying is that
      before
      > > someone becomes COMMISSIONED, they must have certain qualifications;
      > Can
      > > you fly a 17,000 MPH space shuttle? Can you do space walks? If you
      see
      > a
      > > UFO, will you keep your darn mouth shut and never disclose the
      details
      > > to anyone unless NASA consent? In the case of Sen. Barack Hussein
      > Obama,
      > > his commission is of a very high quality and not too many of us on
      > earth
      > > would qualify.
      > > As for you mr. masanga a probable commission that fits your mental
      > > level, I think any 2 year old soul or child would suffice!
      > > Give me a break mr. masanGA by not responding please I beg you!
      > >
      > > --- In ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com, masanga@ wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Dear Nathaniel,
      > > >
      > > > "President-Elect Sen. Baraack Hussein Obama is commissioned to do
      a
      > > certain
      > > > number of divine things during these perilous endtimes of the
      greedy
      > > > wicked...."
      > > >
      > > > Aren't we all? We all have to honour the spiritual purposes
      > > of our
      > > > lives or else die in disgrace. Surely Obama is no different to
      > anyone
      > > else
      > > > in this respect.
      > > >
      > > > ".....I predicted, and so did the Zetas space angels, that barck
      > would
      > > win
      > > > despite enormous seemily insurmountable odds against him!...."
      > > >
      > > > So did a lot of other people predict it too and without
      > > needing any
      > > > "space angels" to tell them either. And what exactly were the
      > > "seemingly
      > > > insurmountable odds against him" to which you are referring? He
      > > seemed to
      > > > have a clear run to me.
      > > >
      > > > ".....His victory is unprecedented and incredible,...."
      > > >
      > > > Why is it? Because of his black skin? What is so incredible
      > > about
      > > > that? This is the 21st century, not the 1960s.
      > > >
      > > > "......and credit should be afforded to him at the very least; and
      > > praises
      > > > to his well chosen team and to God and to all the space angels who
      > > asssisted
      > > > him in making this victory a success, as Barack is guided and
      > > protected
      > > > around the clock 24/7!!"
      > > >
      > > > You speak as though winning the presidency of the USA was a
      > > > meritorious act, deserving of credit! But what merit is there
      really
      > > in
      > > > defeating one's opponents in a competition for power and
      dominance?
      > > > Ravening beasts do that all the time. You do not seem to be facing
      > up
      > > to
      > > > the contradictions that exist in the USA's political system, which
      > is
      > > > supposed to be a democracy but, as Bush Jr has proved, is in fact
      a
      > > system
      > > > of winner-takes-all elective dictatorship. In a true democracy,
      > where
      > > the
      > > > people actually govern, it would not be possible for Obama to
      become
      > > the
      > > > all-powerful "President" (for which we should all now read
      > "Emperor").
      > > > Obama's position is already hypocritical and he hasn't even taken
      > > office
      > > > yet. Where is the merit in any of this? Why should he receive
      credit
      > > for
      > > > becoming the Emperor of the USA? That does not seem rational to
      me.
      > > >
      > > > "I detest hearing that Mrs. Sister Nancy Lieder is building a
      cult!
      > > She is
      > > > doing the same as Barck in trying to prepare our human
      consciousness
      > > for the
      > > > wonderful transformation of this planet to 4th density righteous."
      > > >
      > > > I am sorry that you detest hearing this but it is the truth as
      > > I see
      > > > it. I do not claim to know her motives for doing it and they may
      be
      > > as you
      > > > say, i.e. that she is trying to prepare our human consciousness
      for
      > > > transformation to "4th density righteous", whatever that means. I
      > > think she
      > > > is building a cult because she offers no objective proof that is
      > > independent
      > > > of her say-so for any of the claims that she makes. She is
      asserting
      > > the
      > > > existence of an alternative reality that no-one but she, or the
      > > anonymous
      > > > "Zeta" can experience and she is inviting people to believe in it
      on
      > > sheer
      > > > blind faith. Surely this is cult-building by anyone's definition
      of
      > > the
      > > > terms.
      > > >
      > > > ".......For that , she should be praised instead of being
      rediculed
      > > and
      > > > sconld...."
      > > >
      > > > What has she done to merit praise? And when did I ridicule or
      > > scold
      > > > her? All I have done is to say what I see her as doing,
      impartially
      > > and
      > > > objectively.
      > > >
      > > > "....We have not been given the full picture as of yet due to our
      > > morbid
      > > > intransigence...."
      > > >
      > > > How interesting. "Intransigence" means "refusal to
      > > compromise" and
      > > > to "compromise" means to "make concessions". So Nancy Lieder wants
      > us
      > > to
      > > > make concessions before she will give us her full picture. I
      wonder
      > > what
      > > > they are. What price is she asking for her "full picture"? I think
      > > she
      > > > cannot expect us to consider buying it if she doesn't state the
      > price.
      > > But
      > > > then that would be an effect of her intransigence I think, not
      ours.
      > > >
      > > > "......Next coming as a grand spectacular finale, is the
      > re-appearance
      > > of
      > > > the dreaded almighty Messiah/Mahdi within two years or less!
      > > > Thereafter, none on earth will have any contrary doubts or
      > arguments."
      > > >
      > > > Oh yes? Well, we'll have to wait and see about that, won't
      > > we? Or
      > > > is this another one of Nancy's "little white lies", like her
      absurd
      > > > statement that Planet X entered the inner solar system in 2003
      which
      > > she has
      > > > now repeated in the ZetaTalk newsletter of 1st November 2008 and
      > which
      > > you
      > > > posted here on 4th November? It's really interesting to see how
      she
      > > can
      > > > turn an alleged truth into an alleged lie and then turn it back
      into
      > > an
      > > > alleged truth again without any of her followers questioning it or
      > > even
      > > > appearing to notice. What has become of their rational
      intelligence?
      > > It is
      > > > nowhere to be seen! Is that the real price which we must be
      willing
      > > to pay
      > > > before she will give us "the full picture"? If so the price is too
      > > high for
      > > > me and I am not in the market to buy it. I already have my own
      "full
      > > > picture" of reality that I have acquired by painstaking use of my
      > own
      > > > perceptual faculties. Why should I discard it for her unclear and
      > > > ambivalent conception that purports to be the truth one moment and
      a
      > > lie the
      > > > next and then the truth again without rhyme or reason? Sorry, but
      > > > appearances notwithstanding, I was not born yesterday.
      > > >
      > > > Regards,
      > > > Regan
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ----- Original Message -----
      > > > From: nathaniel x vance
      > > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 5:47 PM
      > > > Subject: [ufodiscussion] Re: ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction
      [11-08-08]
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Dear Regan, Ted,
      > > > President-Elect Sen. Baraack Hussein Obama is commissioned to do a
      > > > certain number of divine things during these perilous endtimes of
      > the
      > > > greedy wicked. I predicted, and so did the Zetas space angels,
      that
      > > > barck would win despite enormous seemily insurmountable odds
      against
      > > > him! His victory is unprecedented and incredible, and credit
      should
      > be
      > > > afforded to him at the very least; and praises to his well chosen
      > team
      > > > and to God and to all the space angels who asssisted him in making
      > > this
      > > > victory a success, as Barack is guided and protected around the
      > clock
      > > > 24/7!!
      > > > I detest hearing that Mrs. Sister Nancy Lieder is building a cult!
      > She
      > > > is doing the same as Barck in trying to prepare our human
      > > consciousness
      > > > for the wonderful transformation of this planet to 4th density
      > > > righteous. For that , she should be praised instead of being
      > rediculed
      > > > and sconld.
      > > > We have not been given the full picture as of yet due to our
      morbid
      > > > intransigence. Next coming as a grand spectacular finale, is the
      > > > re-appearance of the dreaded almighty Messiah/Mahdi within two
      years
      > > or
      > > > less!
      > > > Thereafter, none on earth will have any contrary doubts or
      > arguments.
      > > >
      > > > --- In ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com, "Ted" ufoazbk@ wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Nice to hear a sane voice of reason.
      > > > > I'm glad to hear all went well with the move, boy they can be a
      > > bitch
      > > > at
      > > > > times.
      > > > > Obama, well we'll see. Why anyone would want that job is beyond
      > me.
      > > > > Especially now. Every where you turn, if informed at the
      > slightest,
      > > > the
      > > > > economy is on the ropes and looks like it's going down for the
      > > count.
      > > > And by
      > > > > the looks of it , it's going to be one LONG COUNT.
      > > > >
      > > > > Will he lead us not into temptation,, but deliver us from AIG,
      > > FANNIE
      > > > mae,
      > > > > freddy Mac, FORD, GM and all of the others that are lining up.
      One
      > > > would
      > > > > think so by all of the media hype. but he will pump more paper
      > money
      > > > into
      > > > > the three automobile companies, that's for sure.Why , I have no
      > > idea,
      > > > and
      > > > > his reason is week at best., There isn't any money to buy the
      damn
      > > > things.
      > > > > Heck, maybe it would have been easier to have written in Nancy's
      > > name
      > > > for
      > > > > President. She could have fixed this problem through her little
      > > > friends.
      > > > > Good to see you're back.
      > > > > Later...
      > > > > Ted
      > > > > ----- Original Message -----
      > > > > From: masanga@
      > > > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:08 AM
      > > > > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction
      > [11-08-08]
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > > Hi Ted,
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Thanks for the welcome back. It took longer than I expected
      > > > to get
      > > > > > reconnected to the net after making my house-move and when I
      > > > eventually
      > > > > > got
      > > > > > back on-line I found that I had hundreds of emails waiting for
      > me
      > > in
      > > > my
      > > > > > In-box. I have been ploughing through them over the past few
      > days
      > > > and was
      > > > > > struck by the general lack of discussion about anything on
      this
      > > > forum
      > > > > > although momentous events have happened in the world, the
      > election
      > > > of
      > > > > > Barack
      > > > > > Obama to the US presidency being probably the most momentous
      of
      > > > them. The
      > > > > > masses have been celebrating in the streets and shedding tears
      > of
      > > > joy in
      > > > > > the
      > > > > > fond belief that their day has come at last. In their minds a
      > new
      > > > age has
      > > > > > dawned and in their hearts new hope has been born. Yet this
      > > > > > world-historic
      > > > > > event appears to have raised not a single comment from anyone
      > > here.
      > > > Why
      > > > > > not? I found this puzzling.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Of course I was not expecting anyone here to discuss the
      > > > election
      > > > > > from the mundane point of view of the media pundits and the
      > > > politicians
      > > > > > themselves, but rather from their own unconventional point of
      > view
      > > > that
      > > > > > presumably is based outside-the-box in the exotic field that
      > > > constitutes
      > > > > > this forum's subject-matter. But no such luck. Only two posts
      in
      > > > the
      > > > > > whole
      > > > > > of the past week have even made reference to it. One was
      Alfred
      > > > > > Lambremont
      > > > > > Webre's inconclusive assessment of Obama's possible commitment
      > to
      > > > remove
      > > > > > the
      > > > > > Great UFO Cover Up, about which I found it difficult to say
      > > anything
      > > > > > myself
      > > > > > so I would not have expected anyone else to respond to it
      > either.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > The other post was Nathaniel's epistle from ZetaTalk and I
      > > > found no
      > > > > > difficulty in responding to that. Indeed, I had to restrain
      > myself
      > > > from
      > > > > > turning it into chopped liver again as is my natural tendency
      > > > whenever I
      > > > > > am
      > > > > > confronted by such an obvious con. But I have already
      performed
      > > > that
      > > > > > service several times on other occasions at this forum and I
      > don't
      > > > want to
      > > > > > get stuck in repeating it endlessly, entertaining as the
      > spectacle
      > > > may be.
      > > > > > Nancy Lieder appears to me to be building a cult - the cult of
      > the
      > > > Zeta -
      > > > > > on
      > > > > > the basis of nothing but make-believe and I think that only
      > those
      > > > among us
      > > > > > who are unusually gullible and undiscerning would fall prey to
      > it.
      > > > So my
      > > > > > response this time was simply to offer a warning - Rumi's
      > warning
      > > in
      > > > > > fact -
      > > > > > to anyone who may feel inclined to fall in with this
      > cult-building
      > > > > > activity
      > > > > > and to start allowing Nancy Lieder's "space-beings" to dictate
      > > their
      > > > > > personal reality to them. Of course I do not deny their
      freedom
      > to
      > > > do
      > > > > > that
      > > > > > if they wish to do it; I only deny their freedom to evade the
      > > > natural
      > > > > > consequences of doing it.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I'm sorry if I may have sounded vengeful but as I hope I have
      > > > now
      > > > > > made clear, I was not being so. No-one has offended me here.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Warm regards,
      > > > > > Regan
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
      > > > > > From: Ted
      > > > > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 12:45 AM
      > > > > > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction
      > > [11-08-08]
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > > So you're back with a vengeance
      > > > > > Well I meant a quote.
      > > > > > .
      > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
      > > > > > From: masanga@
      > > > > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 4:33 PM
      > > > > > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction
      > > [11-08-08]
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > >> Subscribers to the Zeta-cult may wish to ponder the sage
      > > > words of
      > > > > >> the sufi mystic and original whirling Dervish called Rumi,
      who
      > is
      > > > > >> reported
      > > > > >> to have said:
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> "Humanity is bewildered by false idols and driven by vain
      > > > > >> fantasies
      > > > > >> into the pit of destruction."
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Regan
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
      > > > > >> From: nathaniel x vance
      > > > > >> To: grandfathergreywolf@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > TheCosmicCafe@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> UFOsecrets@yahoogroups.com ; alien-teachers@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> CaptainFreon@yahoogroups.com ; realufos@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com ; cwgconcepts@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> earth2025@yahoogroups.com ; earthchanges_prep@yahoogroups.com
      ;
      > > > > >> iufo@yahoogroups.com ; marssouthpolereturns@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> tt-alt-watch@yahoogroups.com ; ufo2u@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> ufoandparanormalstuff@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > ufos-unbound@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> earthchanges@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > earthspiritmedicinewheel@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> etandufoconspiracyandhistoryonearthandnibiru@yahoogroups.com
      ;
      > > > > >> exraelians@yahoogroups.com ; prepare4contact@yahoogroups.com
      ;
      > > > > >> the_zetaheaven_group@yahoogroups.com ;
      > > > > >> ufo_hotline_bulleti@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:50 PM
      > > > > >> Subject: [ufodiscussion] ZetaTalk: Godlikeproduction
      [11-08-08]
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> ZetaTalk:
      > > > > >> GodlikeProduction Live
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> written
      > > > > >> November 8, 2008 on the GodlikeProduction live chat.
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Questioner: Obama
      > > > > >> looked 5 years older in his first press conference today than
      > he
      > > > did on
      > > > > >> election night. Would the Zetas like to tell us what he found
      > out
      > > > in his
      > > > > >> intelligence briefing? [and from another] Now that Obama is
      the
      > > new
      > > > > >> president, what does it mean for the
      > > > > >> cover-up? When will he be fully educated about the pole
      shift?
      > > The
      > > > Zetas
      > > > > >> have
      > > > > >> hinted Obama has heard only rumors so far. [and from another]
      I
      > > > would
      > > > > >> like
      > > > > >> to ask the Zetas if on
      > > > > >> Thursday's meeting Barack Obama was finally told about Planet
      > X,
      > > > and if
      > > > > >> so
      > > > > >> was
      > > > > >> that weighting heavy on his mind when at the press conference
      > > > Friday the
      > > > > >> CNN
      > > > > >> reporter asked him if something out of the briefing gave him
      > > > "pause"
      > > > > >> (I interpreted as "sobering") when compared to the pre-Nov
      4th
      > > > > >> scenarios and how he seemed to take a big "gulp" after he
      > > declined
      > > > to
      > > > > >> comment.
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Zeta response: Be aware that if the soul of Obama, or the
      > > consensus
      > > > > >> of his guides, make a request that we not reveal a matter in
      > his
      > > > heart
      > > > > >> and
      > > > > >> mind, then we will not comment. That said, it was clear that
      > > Obama
      > > > looked
      > > > > >> older
      > > > > >> and more tired during his first official press conference as
      > the
      > > > > >> President-Elect than he had during any time during his
      > candidacy.
      > > > Yet the
      > > > > >> race
      > > > > >> was won, the election over and he clearly gained. What was
      > > causing
      > > > him
      > > > > >> loss
      > > > > >> of
      > > > > >> sleep? There were no foreign policy revelations that he did
      not
      > > > already
      > > > > >> suspect. Biden has a good finger on what goes on around the
      > world
      > > > and
      > > > > >> what
      > > > > >> the
      > > > > >> various players are up to, so there were no surprises. Obama
      > also
      > > > did not
      > > > > >> learn
      > > > > >> any revelations about the Bush administration, about Bush and
      > > > company
      > > > > >> crimes,
      > > > > >> as this is not the CIA's area. That would be the purview of
      the
      > > FBI
      > > > and
      > > > > >> the
      > > > > >> Justice Department. But he did learn with certainty that a
      > > > planetary
      > > > > >> presence
      > > > > >> is in the solar system, with an outcome not yet determined.
      He
      > > had
      > > > heard
      > > > > >> the
      > > > > >> rumors, and there were people on his staff who had read and
      > > relayed
      > > > to
      > > > > >> him
      > > > > >> information about ZetaTalk, but this was his first official
      > > > confirmation.
      > > > > >> Why would
      > > > > >> the CIA relay this? All national security matters outside the
      > US
      > > > > >> boundaries
      > > > > >> are
      > > > > >> the purview of the CIA. Just what this will mean for the
      > > cover-up,
      > > > and
      > > > > >> how
      > > > > >> Obama will handle any announcements to the public has not yet
      > > been
      > > > > >> decided.
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Questioner: What does the future after the pole
      > > > > >> shift hold for Obama? Will he and his family be protected?
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Zeta response: This
      > > > > >> family is entirely Service-to-Other, and as such has many
      > options
      > > > in the
      > > > > >> future.
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Questioner: Does Obama suspect that he is a star
      > > > > >> child? Was his "séance gaffe" a hint to his personal
      > beliefs?
      > > He
      > > > is
      > > > > >> known to be inspired by Lincoln; GMS has written that Obama
      is
      > > > Lincoln
      > > > > >> reincarnated. Is GMS correct, or was he more or less speaking
      > > > > >> figuratively?
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Zeta response: Obama was also Lincoln, as is obvious to many,
      > > > > >> including Gordon Michael-Scallion (GMS). Most Star Children
      > > > recognize
      > > > > >> early
      > > > > >> that they are different, and sense the reason why. In Obama's
      > > case,
      > > > he
      > > > > >> was
      > > > > >> a
      > > > > >> walk-in during his teens, so was able to choose the body and
      > life
      > > > > >> circumstances
      > > > > >> for his mission. In such cases, where a walk-in occurs, the
      > human
      > > > body
      > > > > >> and
      > > > > >> mind
      > > > > >> sense a change, and seek an answer for this, arriving at the
      > > > conclusion
      > > > > >> that
      > > > > >> they have a new soul within.
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> <http://zetatalk.com/index/zeta482.htm>
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> The
      > > > > >> ZetaTalk Newsletter
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Issue 104,
      > > > > >> Sunday November 9, 2008
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> Election
      > > > > >> Results
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> As predicted by
      > > > > >> the Zetas, no election fraud occurred. The anticipated
      result,
      > > > state by
      > > > > >> state,
      > > > > >> was expressed at the polls. Even Indiana,
      > > > > >> which was projected ever so slightly (by 1.4%) to go to
      McCain
      > > > ended up
      > > > > >> in
      > > > > >> Obama's column. Compare the projected result, based on polls,
      > to
      > > > the
      > > > > >> actual
      > > > > >> result as of Wednesday morning, November 5, 2008.
      > > > > >> Source:<http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/>
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> <http://zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue104.htm>
      > > > > >>
      > > > > >> We're in the ENDTIME of the Wicked and Not the RIGHTEOUS -
      GOD
      > is
      > > > Not
      > > > > >> MOCKED!
      > > > > >> salaam akwaaba jambo Ashogee
      > > > > >> http://zetaheaven.org
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > > ------------------------------------
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.