Re: [ufodiscussion] The Truth Must Prevail! National Security Dictates It.
- Interesting revelations, Dex, and highly believable by my reckoning.
I'm not sure about Cheney being in detention though. Who would have the
authority and the courage to do that? Only the super-elite gang of
criminals who are actually controlling the country, I would think. If he's
fallen out with them then he must really be in trouble.
But if the nation has fallen into the hands of lying criminals like
Bush Jr, Cheney and the Old Boys Network that supports them and runs the
country, how can it have any security at all? The very idea of "National
Security" becomes a contradiction in terms then, wouldn't you say? I mean,
these psychopaths were not placed in office to protect the nation, were
they? They were put there to plunder and ravish it and to use it as a
power-base and launch-platform for their hideous-nightmare project in
tyrannical global empire-building. I'm afraid the USA lost its national
security long ago and the problem confronting the American people now is
that of somehow getting it back.
There is no quick, simple and easy solution to this problem either.
The rot is too deep and too extensive for that. Things are too far gone
already and the nation is in terminal decline. There is no avoiding this
death because it has already happened. The old republic, based on the rule
of the Constitution, is already dead and has been quietly replaced by an
unaccountable imperium that rules by secret executive order. But the new
Imperium is corrupt, incompetent and quite mad. I'm afraid that the chances
of the American nation transforming itself from within and arising from the
ashes of its former existence like a reborn phoenix look slim to me. The
disintegration of the nation into smaller units that are capable of
governing themselves more harmoniously and intelligently seems a more likely
possibility and a more desirable one too. At least it could see the end of
the MIC that has so ravaged all human civilization up to now.
In such a new world, I trust that ethical ETs would feel more
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 12:08 AM
Subject: [ufodiscussion] The Truth Must Prevail! National Security Dictates
If this is real, perhaps, some of the reason's why ethical ET's aren't
welcomed in our world.. From their investigations they've learned the truth.
Remember Rama, from Ganymede telling Chacho in the book "Date with the Gods"
a problem we have with our economy is that it's also based on a war armament
WE NOW PRESENT THIS MATERIAL FOR AS MANY AMERICANS TO READ AS POSSIBLE
In conformity with the stance adopted by Robert Chapman, and in deference to
the Editor’s own distinguished intermediary who sent this material to the
Editor on 25th May, we have adopted the following procedure here:
• (1) First, the exact language is retained, with some slight editing and
some omissions on grounds of length. Certain intervening meaningless
characters implying extraction of the lengthy text from an incompatible
program have been deleted;
• (2) The Editor has broken up the text into groups of paragraphs, preceded
by cross-heads, to facilitate comprehension of what this document implies;
•(3) The Editor has selected components of the text/testimony verbatim, but
has omitted sections which elaborate existing material, the object being to
provide an overview of this previously never published ‘hard copy’
information which indicates the catastrophic proportions of the embedded US
official corruption while, we believe, revealing only perhaps 1% of what has
been going on.
As noted, the Editor read this text in the middle of the night of 25th/26th
May, in order to assess what should be done with this material. He decided
to post this straight away.
He would add the following:
• There is some very unpleasant detail, which all readers will find
unbearable, but which cannot be excluded, otherwise the whole point of this
exposure will be lost; and:
• There are clear references to the Illuminati’s satanic activity which, we
know goes on behind the scenes and which is addressed in the Editor’s book
The New Underworld Order.
But here, at last, we have hands-on, officially-sourced information
identifying Cheney as what we always thought he was: a reincarnation of the
worst manifestation of corrupt Luciferian Nazism, exhibiting an unrestrained
‘Black’ idolatry of money for self-enrichment, global power and control
purposes which has corrupted the entire American Government from the top
down. Fish rot from the head, and the stench of this rotting corpse can be
smelt all round the world.
CULTURE OF ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION (‘ANOMIE’) REVEALED BY EMILE DIRKHEIM
It is perhaps surprising that Robert Chapman has not connected this
devastating intelligence with the colossal financial corruption crisis that
we have been reporting. No criticism whatsoever is intended if we wonder why
there is surprise that billions have been stolen by these crooks, when we
know now that the sums stolen, diverted and misappropriated under Cheney and
Bush (the two most corrupt holders of high office in US history) run into
the hundreds of trillions of dollars.
It is also quite surprising that the veteran and extremely accomplished and
courageous former CIA officer who has delivered this devastating data (with
a great deal more to come) to a Congressional Committee, appears to have
been unaware of the far larger, indeed gargantuan financial corruption
scams, thefts and diversions over which this same repulsive Cheney fellow
has presided in recent years. But what is revealed herewith is evidence of
the Bush Crime Family’s underlying, structured culture of TOTAL CORRUPTION
(that is to say, of the ‘anomie’ environment initially identified by the
French criminologist Emile Dirkheim [1858-1917]), whereby perpetual
criminality is the norm, and adherence to the Rule of Law is considered
aberrant, eccentric, and worthy [see below] of death.
Congress is deeply compromised, with 1,500+ people on The Hill having been
identified in April 2007, as we reported at the time, as beneficiaries of
secret offshore bank accounts. Bribery of legislators under Cheney has been
Therefore, some will ask: what is to be gained from forwarding this deadly
information to Congress, where, on the basis of past experience, it is
likely to be buried?
Well, by exposing its existence to a wider public on this website, are we
not helping to make it essentially IMPOSSIBLE for the Legislative Branch to
turn a blind eye any longer to the organised criminality that is herewith
identified inside the named US structures, to ignore the conditions for
monumental breaches of US national security they have yielded and will
continue to generate, and to disregard the associated gross TREASON
consequently perpetrated by the President and the Vice President of the
United States against the American people?
And would it not represent a display of criminally feckless weakness and
putrid co-conspiratorial complacency for the appropriate action against
these criminals to be delayed ANY LONGER?
The curtain rises at the beginning of ‘ACT TWO’....
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS AND CONTEXT
Subject: Halliburton Thefts: News from an ex-CIA Insider:
Dear Bob Chapman, I happened across one of your articles on Halliburton. As
I am in the process of writing to Waxman's Oversight and Reform Committee
some of what I know about Halliburton etc., I will pass on some of it to
you. Please feel free to use it in the interest of the public good.
Sent on Friday 16 May 2008 to:
Chairman Waxman, Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform at http://oversight.house.gov/contact:
Thank you so much for your integrity and work exposing corruption. I
collected intelligence in Iraq and Afghanistan for the CIA until August 2004
when I was outed by Cheney for refusing to make propaganda that Iran was
developing nuclear weapons. My official title within the CIA was Special
Operations Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence. Since I set up
the Remote Viewing Defense protocols for the Pentagon, I was given a title
of Remote Viewing Advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a rank of a
Two-Star General in the US military.
That rank was largely a bogus ploy by the Pentagon to get more of my time
from the CIA and force me to attend a Joint Chiefs of Staff Meeting once a
month. I did so from October 2003 to July 2004.
On orders of my boss, DCI George Tenet, in August 2001 I removed a moving
van full of Pentagon
documents showing Defense Contractor kickbacks to Pentagon officials.
I removed them from the Pentagon and they were driven to the CIA.
It took me about 10 days of time to get the Pentagon people to turn those
documents over to me en masse. The ethical intelligence methods that I used
to do so are beyond the scope of this text.
Alas, the CIA's intention turned out not to be to expose and correct the
corruption, but to cover it up, as judged by later events. Clearly I did not
have time to read all of those documents in one week. My job was not to
evaluate those documents and address the corruption: it was to run a
counter-intelligence type of op. to collect them.
However, I did become aware of the depth of corruption during the course of
that week and did read some of them. It is amazing what ended up in print
because people in the Pentagon felt so immune from prosecution, especially
under Mr Bush Jr. in the White House. The main reason for collecting those
documents, I believe in retrospect, was to allow CIA analysts to evaluate
how to take business away from other US Defense Contractors and give it to
Halliburton and Carlyle-related contractors. [Editor: How this was done si
relate din detail below].
‘WAR IS COMING BECAUSE THE BUSH FAMILY WILL MAKE BILLIONS FROM IT’
The mood at the CIA and Pentagon was: war is coming because the Bush Family
stands to make billions from it: so get ready. I did come across reports
later which confirmed that the documents had been used in that fashion. That
is, they were used to blackmail Pentagon officials into 'working on' on the
Halliburton-Carlyle team, or to judge how much to bribe them to switch to
that team. So,
I am afraid, in retrospectively thinking about it, that my actions led to
worse, not less, corruption. Certainly that corruption did not serve the US
public nor our country's national security interests.
TENET: 'THOSE DOCUMENTS WILL MAKE ME RICH'
I want to mention a conversation that I had with DCI Tenet after giving him
these documents. The moving van full of them had just arrived at the CIA's
headquarters in Langley. Tenet laughed and said to me ‘You have just given
me the keys to the Kingdom’. I guess that I was a bit dense, as I did not
grasp immediately what he meant. So, I asked him ‘How?’ He said to me in
front of McLaughlin, the Deputy Executive Director (both of whom I knew
rather too well at the time), ‘Those documents will make me rich’. Horrified
that he might fence them on the black market for cash I replied: ‘How dare
you sell them to the Russians’. I believe that some of the documents that I
brought back from the Pentagon did get sold to the Russians later to make a
UNVETTED HALLIBURTON AND CACI STAFF WORKING INSIDE THE CIA
[After the officer had investigated suspicious fiddling of work rosters
which, to sum up, ensured that only personnel ‘on the take’ were handling
Halliburton deliveries...] a CIA official knocked on my office door. That
was unusual as there was bold black lettering on the door that no one should
knock without the permission of the DCI. That notice had been put up by
Tenet because he was
tired of people taking up my time. He wanted it all to himself and his
chores. The man then barged in without waiting for a reply from me and
stated loudly that I had now been called off looking into supply problems at
the Pentagon, not supply problems to the troops.
Since the person I had emailed (details omitted) was in the next office,
presumably it was for their ears that he was speaking so loudly. He then
shut the door and walked off, again without waiting for a reply from me.
That man was indeed someone I recognized.
At the CIA we jokingly called him 'Halliburton's Representative to the CIA'.
Like his counterpart at the Pentagon, he handled all of the delivery
problems for Halliburton products arriving at the CIA. He was paid by the
CIA a salary, just like that Pentagon man.
But after looking into their backgrounds I could find no evidence that
either had been hired by the
CIA or the military through their personnel depts. Neither had done military
training or been trained at ‘the Farm’ as a spy.
The more I looked into that, which I had not been called off of, the more
curious it became. Finally, one day months later I knocked on the
Halliburton's Representative to the CIA's office door. I was surprised when
it opened to find not the office of a single man but a whole section of
offices. I had worked at the CIA for over 30 years and thought I knew it
inside and out.
But a new section had been added onto the other side of that door. Over 40
people worked in it and they were all working for Halliburton while being
paid by the US taxpayer as if they were CIA. I checked that carefully. The
CIA's Human Resources Department had no files on them. It had never
interviewed them for the job. IT HAD NEVER VETTED THEM. The CIA had a back
door in its security created to let Halliburton put anyone they wanted into
the hallways of the CIA.
OUTRAGEOUS, CATASTROPHIC ONGOING BREACHES OF U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY
It was an outrageous violation of US national security. And this was after
9/11 and the terrorism scare. I immediately reported it to Tenet and he said
‘Yes, I know’. I checked with the Head of CIA building security and he
admitted that he knew too. I asked him what he was going to do about it.
He said ‘Keep my mouth shut so I can stay alive and I suggest you do the
same’. That sounded like a threat to me, even though indirectly worded. I
asked him who would kill me if I talked about it.
He hemmed and hawed a bit. I asked him if he would try to kill me if I
talked about it. He said no but others would. I went fishing and asked: Do
you think Halliburton will kill me for it? He didn't reply. Then I asked
‘Will the CIA?’ He said; ‘Not likely, you are inside the CIA’. Then I asked:
'Will CACI'? At that, he agreed that they would likely try in defense of
their sister enterprise, Halliburton. I asked him if CACI had their own back
door into the CIA so that I should be afraid of them while I was inside the
CIA. He acknowledged that they did. [Details of the CACI 'backdoor' are not
revealed in this exposure but will doubtless form part of the further
evidence being dumped on Congress: Ed.].
THE PATRIOTIC LONG-TERM CIA OFFICER CONFRONTS TENETCROOK TO HIS FACE
Now back to my knocking on the Halliburton company offices at the CIA. A
security guard there immediately asked me for my Halliburton ID. When I did
not have one, he asked me if I had an appointment to see someone. I
mentioned the name of the man who knocked on my door and that man came out
to greet me. He invited me into his office. The furniture in it was better
than the DCI had upstairs, though this was on the ground floor. We
chit-chatted a few minutes and then I got down to business. I asked him if
Halliburton intended to short the troops on their supplies on purpose, or
was incompetent. By then I had the evidence in my office that Halliburton
was shipping only half of its invoice contents in many of its cartons [which
was what this veteran officer had been investigating previously: Ed.]. That
was true in the war zones as well.
It had set up the same corrupt system of swing shift receivers [i.e.,
ensuring that only key corrupt personnel were used to handle Halliburton
goods, which was done by rigging the work rotas: Ed.] on at least three
continents. They received the cartons and signed that the goods well all
received properly. Then the shortages later were chalked up to thefts or war
damage, etc. He looked at me awhile before he replied. Then he said: ‘I know
nothing about it. I then laid copies of some of the documents that I had on
his desk that proved that Halliburton was doing this. He said he would look
into it and called security to usher me out of the office.
Later that day (it was after Christmas in 2001) I reported to Tenet that I
had found evidence that Halliburton was short-shipping to the Pentagon and
the war zones. He at first said, ‘That is nothing new’. And then, realizing
that he had just admitted knowing about it without correcting it said, ‘Have
a report about it on my desk before Christmas'. He had been saying that
probably for weeks and now, under the stress of my asking him about this
corruption, he inappropriately persevered that comment. Christmas had passed
about 3 days before, at the very least.
When he caught that mistake a moment later, he admitted: ‘I just can't get
rid of that problem’.
I then asked him what he had tried to do about it.
He did not reply. Instead he sent me to speak to another man he said that he
had put to work on the problem. Yes, you guessed it correctly: he sent me to
speak to Halliburton's Representative to the CIA. I had just come from his
office that morning and I said so.
Tenet played ignorant of the fact that the man worked for Halliburton. I
reminded Tenet that I had been asked to show my Halliburton ID to even get
to his office. He offered to call down there to make sure I could get in
when I went. I told him that it was his responsibility to correct
Halliburton's short-shipping and its invasion of the CIA, not Halliburton’s.
He said that he couldn't because his hands were tied behind his back by the
White House. I made a mock walk around to the other side of him to look for
his hands tied behind him and said: ‘That is not what I see’. He said:
‘There is nothing I can do about it’. I picked up his phone and handed it to
him and said: ‘You can start by calling Congress, the FBI, and the New York
Times. They would believe you, if you did so’.
He declined to make those calls. I told him that the head of the CIA should
be a man of courage.
But he never did make the calls. I went to my office and started making
First I faxed the documents I had over to the GAO [General Accounting, now
Accountability, Office]. I needed to have copies of them outside of my
office before it got raided. They were not national security secrets: they
were Halliburton short-shipping papers. One of them was even a memo on
Halliburton stationery discussing the short-shipping policy and how well it
was working to make profits for the corporation.
When I called the GAO to make sure that they received the documents, they
checked them carefully to make sure that they were all legible. There were
over 100 pages of documents and it took them a while. After they finished
they agreed to look for the GAO investigator who had come out to speak to me
before [details omitted here: Ed.].. But before they could get him on the
phone to me, there was a knock at my door and in barged Halliburton's
Representative to the CIA.
[Now read what happened next... Ed.]:
FLUNG INTO HALLIBURTON’S OWN JAIL CELL BENEATH ITS OFFICES INSIDE THE CIA...
He yanked my phone out of the wall. Then he had his security guards ransack
my office and take every shred of paper out of it. Then he had me bodily
hauled off to a prison cell located inside the Halliburton offices at the
CIA. It was in the basement there. There I was intimidated and my life was
threatened. I wondered if it would be ended.
It occurred to me that the CIA head of building security might not know that
Halliburton had its own torturers and assassins. I decided to cooperate. I
promised not to investigate Halliburton for the rest of the year. I figured
that I could keep my promise for the 2 days left in the year. Somehow they
accepted my promise and let me go.
I immediately went up to Tenet's office and complained and showed him the
bruises that they had given me. He said: 'There, there, everything will be
alright in the morning'.
That was not true. Halliburton was still stealing the US taxpayer's dollars
in the morning and the troops were still going without. But at that time I
was too tired to fight any more that day. I decided to put myself in a place
that I could keep my promise and requested leave to fly back to my home in
California. Tenet agreed and I managed to get out of the building without
further incident. I believe that the GAO still has the documents that I sent
them buried in its files.
They started an investigation into it and then it was interrupted. But I
believe that they are willing to go forward with the investigation now, if
asked to do so. I believe that your asking them to do it would be enough to
accomplish that. The GAO has done a lot of good work. You could write a
letter to its Head and ask them to restart that investigation.
CHENEY, ON BEHALF OF HALLIBURTON, ROUTINELY BARKED ORDERS AT TENET
It was not true that Cheney stopped running Halliburton [when he took
office].That is a complete myth. He called in orders to the man I worked for
[Tenet: Ed.] almost every day and sometimes twice or more times a day. He
remained the functional head of it in all but name. No one at Halliburton
had the power to override his orders. Second, it is not true that he
divested himself of the profits of the
company. He merely hid how they got to him through a series of shell
[The veteran CIA officer then explained how in detail how to compare the
‘creative’ accounting software and methodology employed by Halliburton, the
CIA and the Pentagon, from which it was possible to identify how the massive
ongoing frauds, designed to extract illegal profits out of the Afghanistan
and Iraq Wars, were/are perpetrated: Ed.].
CHENEY EMPLOYS FELONS INSIDE THE CIA AND THE PENTAGON
Halliburton rigs a Back Door in the Pentagon Accounting Computer:
It was brought to my notice that Halliburton had already come to the
attention of a Government investigator. We have already seen that
Halliburton had both overbilled and short-shipped. The buyer was the
helpless taxpayer. The investigator worked inside the GAO and had access to
both Halliburton's bills and [to] the Pentagon's payment of those bills. But
there was a problem. Those bills and the payments did not match up. In spite
of the bills being grossly inflated in the first place, the payments
exceeded the bills! That was not by a little, it was by about 35%.
GAO INVESTIGATOR MADE FULLY AWARE OF THESE ORCHESTRATED SCAMS
The GAO investigator was the same man who had come to talk to me in my
office. He remembered me and that I had tried to contact him at the end of
2001. So, he had asked to speak to me by calling the CIA. The CIA would not
let my phone ring whenever he called [thereby covering up its ongoing
complicity with Halliburton in these scams designed to ‘milk the wars’:
But by happenstance one of the many times he tried to call me I picked up
the phone to try to call someone else. So, we connected. I agreed to meet
with him outside of the CIA and later that same day we met at a restaurant
in Mclean, not far from CIA Headquarters. He had with him copies of all of
the materials that I had faxed over to him. He started by asking me
questions on them and taking notes. He was particularly interested in
documenting where I had picked up each document. Then he asked me what I
knew of the Pentagon overpaying Halliburton. It had been two weeks since the
CIA's creative accounting department had alerted me to that problem. By then
I knew a great deal about how that Pentagon overbilling occurred.
HALLIBURTON OFFICES SET UP INSIDE THE PENTAGON, TOO
Rumsfeld had let Halliburton set up offices inside the Pentagon just like
Tenet had let [Halliburton] set them up at the CIA. That was the result of
secret Executive Orders signed by Bush, Jr. [Editor: In other words, this
organised criminal operation was explicitly authorised by criminalist
President George W. Bush Jr. from the outset, who is accordingly being
fingered by this courageous former top CIA officer as being vulnerable to
the charge of treason, on the basis of these findings ALONE(irrespective of
the innumerable other acts of treason that he has committed, and that we
have identified in these reports].
I had by that time a copy of that Executive Order [in the singular here:
Ed.] and handed it to the GAO investigator along with many other documents
that I brought to that meeting. National security was being trashed by the
Bush Administration and what I did had the potential to help restore US
None of the documents would have helped the Russians, the Chinese, etc. wage
war against us.
I had had that independently verified by CIA analysts before I handed over
Correcting the theft of funds would help US national security. One of the
documents that I handed over was the list of Halliburton personnel at the
CIA and at the Pentagon. Their physical offices were together in each
location with their own security personnel. I verified that with my own eyes
the next time I had occasion to go to the Pentagon 20 minutes' drive away.
In addition, I handed over a document that listed their job titles from
their CIA or Pentagon badge application which is all that personnel in those
locations had on them. Even a visitor to the CIA had to fill out such a
form. The amount of checking on that person's background to get that badge
is a call or fax to the FBI to make sure that they are not on a wanted list.
The CIA also checks their name and Driver's License against its 'suspected
foreign agents' and after 9/11 its 'suspected terrorists' list.
But no-one called to verify that they were not felons who had served their
time [in jail] already. Thus, when I checked, I found that ‘Halliburton's
Representative to the CIA’ [the man who had flung the officer into the cell,
after ripping the phone from the wall: Ed.] who was then already my boss for
10 hours a week [in a curious twist not covered here: Ed.]. was a felon who
had served time on a
felony conviction of fraud.
CIA-BASED HALLIBURTON FELON PARTNERED BY PENTAGON-BASED HALLIBURTON FELON
Not unsurprisingly, then, one of the top men at Halliburton's Pentagon Suite
was his partner in that crime who had also been convicted of a felony. The
crime in question was stealing new vehicles bought by the US Army in large
numbers while they were en route to be delivered to the Army.
They had then been sold overseas and the profits pocketed [in an exact
replay of what went on in the ‘former’ Soviet union after the fake ‘collapse
of Communism: Ed.]. His Pentagon badge listed him as an 'accountant'. I
could find no evidence that he had been to business school unless one
counted his jail time as that. His resume that I found elsewhere where he
served on a board as a Director on a company, listed a business school
during the time he spent in prison, about 4 years.
I called up that business school and asked if they had a 'prison outreach
program'. They said no. I asked them if they had a graduate by that name and
they declined to comment. But when I faxed them a copy of the man's resume
on CIA letterhead saying that he was posing as a graduate of their school
they issued a denial that he had ever enrolled.
I gave all those papers to the investigator. Then I gave him the proof that
Halliburton's own CEO, Cheney, had known that they were felons by the fact
that he had blocked a background check on them when they went to a White
House function that he hosted. In addition, I gave that investigator the
proof in the format of several documents together, which showed that this
Halliburton felon posing as an accountant had caused the Pentagon to overpay
Halliburton [huge sums of money].
CHENEY DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN EMPLOYING AND INSTRUCTING PENTAGON FELON
The evidence that that Halliburton felon was the man responsible for the
overpayments by the Pentagon consisted of four elements:
• First off, I had a memo from Cheney to him that was handwritten in
Cheney's hand and addressed to him personally which directed him to make
sure that the Pentagon pays us all that it owes us and then some. The
memorandum appeared to have been hand-delivered. The CIA's internal forgery
department verified the note as Cheney's handwriting and not a forgery. I
try to do careful work.
So their statement to that fact was a document that I handed over with the
original of that memo.
• The next piece of evidence was a letter sent by that felon to a friend and
co-conspirator, in this case my Halliburton boss. In that letter he bragged:
‘I am getting more than we bargained for out of the Pentagon’. It went on to
encourage him to meet him to 'find out how'. I intercepted this letter
before it got to my Halliburton boss, copied it and then put it onto his
desk. I was thus witting to the fact that they were going to discuss that
topic at their next meeting.
• The third piece of evidence was a tape of their conversation at that
meeting. On that tape the
Pentagon felon bragged with delight about how gullible people were at the
Pentagon. He spoke about his going into the Accounting Department of the
Pentagon and making friends with some of them. About how he managed to bring
his own programmer in to check the bills from Halliburton on the excuse that
they had not been paid on time.
Then his programmer had managed to insert code by calling up the Halliburton
computer from the Pentagon's Accounting Computer to check if all the
outstanding bills had been paid. That code put in a back door into the
Pentagon's Accounting Computer, so that Halliburton could later change the
amount that the Pentagon would pay whenever they wanted.
The reason that Halliburton had been caught was that someone forgot to
change their billings up to what they had put in the Pentagon's computer.
• The fourth piece of evidence that I gave him was my boss having one of his
programmers insert that same code into the CIA's Accounting computer. I
waited until he did it and then I collected the evidence, the code. The code
from the CIA's Accounting Computer with a couple of lines before and after
it to show where it had been inserted was the fourth piece of evidence. That
evidence was on a computer disc. I had one of the accounting people sign it
as coming from their computer.
I had first taken all that evidence to my boss, Tenet, to give him a chance
to correct the problem of Halliburton ripping off the American taxpayer via
the CIA and Pentagon. He looked at the evidence and said ‘Well, you
certainly have done a thorough job as usual’. Then he offered to despatch
the evidence over to the White House to 'correct the problem'.
I immediately picked up the evidence off his desk and, walking out of his
office, said that I could do that myself. I did send a copy of the evidence
to the White House. I did that after I met with the GAO official. The White
House managed to block the investigation.
RUMSFELD AND BUSH PERSONALLY FINGERED MAKING MONEY OUT OF WAR SCAMS
The following section needs to be read as presented because to omit any
segment loses the thread and might jeopardise understanding of how the
kickbacks were orchestrated:
Was Rumsfeld Criminally Negligent in Protecting US Troops and national
This is another case that grew out of my moving documents from the Pentagon
to the CIA on DCI Tenet's orders in August 2001... It was brought to my
attention by a Colonel at the Pentagon who handed me a stack of documents ON
THE CONDITION THAT I WOULD READ THEM THAT NIGHT.
It was a pretty big stack, over an inch high. It took me until 4 am in the
morning before I had a firm grasp on the case he had handed me. Since I was
in an office at the Pentagon, it was easy for me to immediately start
investigating it. The hour was late, but that was a good time to look for
and collect the computer files and other documents that I wanted to go with
the Colonel's documents. By THE morning, I had had no sleep, but I had
collected much evidence, and laid it in the inbox the desk of the Pentagon's
Criminal Investigation Unit's Head.
The amount of evidence was over two inches high of documents and four
computer discs, one of which was from the Accounting Office. The Colonel who
had handed me that case then spent all morning in that office giving that
Head his eye-witness testimony with regard to the matter. That testimony
covered only one fourth of the case, and I sent in another three Pentagon
officials in the afternoon to flesh the rest of the case out. Having the
rank of a Two-Star General was essential to that effort. It would not have
happened had I not out-ranked the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit at
the Pentagon, as he was loath to investigate. It would also not have
happened had I not also personally breathed down his neck repeatedly during
the day, by going in person to check how he was doing. Each time I came by,
I insisted that he give me a full briefing on his investigations so far. I
did that four times during the course of the day. I did not dictate the
content of his investigation, but I did insist that he be vigorous in
pursuing it. I mention this practical framework of the case because I am
mainly interested in the larger issue that these cases were not getting
The Colonel giving me the case had been over to that Criminal Investigation
Unit several times previously to file complaints. He was never satisfied
that they were investigated. I was now able to confirm that. Each time the
investigations were dead-ended. It was clear to me by the end of the day
that the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Pentagon was professionally
dedicated to covering up corruption, not investigating or correcting it.
[That's what it was FOR: Ed.].
POSSIBILITY OF FOREIGN PENETRATION OPS INVESTIGATED
I later took some steps to make sure that this was not due to Russian,
Chinese, or other foreign
interventions liable to harm US national security. That I DID have a mandate
to do from the CIA,
wherever I went on assignment. That mandate had been put in place by an
Executive Order of
President Clinton. It could not be over-ridden except by a duly elected
HIGH-LEVEL CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TAXPAYER
Thus, I had some discretion to act outside of the direct orders of the
Director of CIA, Tenet, or the Chief of the JCS. But I could not press this
beyond the limits at which it would break due to political
practices. In the process of that investigation of possible foreign
influence behind the corruption, I ran across a wide-reaching high-level
conspiracy to defraud the US taxpayer. I will be delineating that further in
this series of about 12 cases.
THE DEFECTIVE SAUDI-BUILT GUN THAT JUMPED TO THE LEFT WHEN FIRED
The documents that the Colonel had handed me were on the development and
purchasing of a new free-standing artillery unit. The weapon, a piece of
artillery, did not function as well as an older brand and it was dangerous
to use. Two men had died during the testing of it. But the Pentagon kept on
ordering it. The Colonel knew that the problem had to be kickbacks, as there
was no other rational explanation for what was going on.
But without that proof, the case was had been repeatedly closed as
‘unfounded'. He did not have the espionage background needed to be able to
collect that evidence. As a result he was stymied. By morning I had been
able to lay financial transactions on the top of the inbox. They showed that
at least two Generals had accepted kickbacks straight into their US bank
accounts from that (Saudi) company. Those transactions occurred in the week
after they voted to buy more of those artillery pieces. The amounts of the
transactions were large relative to their salaries, which is how the CIA
gages the effectiveness of bribes.
Any amount greater than 15% of a person's monthly salary is almost certain
to have swayed their decisionmaking processes. In each case, the amount of
the transaction was more than the General
made in a single month. A CIA officer accepting that amount of money from
the KGB or a foreign
source would likely have had a bullet put through his body by the CIA, or
been tried for treason.
Yet, at the Pentagon these kinds of actions were largely tolerated, as if
they did not undermine
national security. In order to fight a war effectively the equipment has to
work and be safe to use. Selling a secret a foreign power might or might not
make a difference in the outcome of a war; not having good equipment was
sure to make a difference.
GENERALS RECEIVED KICKBACK MONEY PAID FROM A FOREIGN BANK
In this case, the company making the artillery was a foreign (Saudi: see
below) company and the Generals had been paid from a foreign bank. It
certainly should have raised a red flag in anyone's mind. The CIA should
have immediately been called in to investigate. But they had not been.
Some months, previously the Colonel had put in a complaint to Rumsfeld about
the sheer lack of investigation by the Pentagon's Criminal Investigation
Unit on this case. In it he had cited the fact that the company making the
artillery was a foreign one and raised the issue as to whether it was a
deliberate attempt to sabotage US national security by selling them
He had asked Rumsfeld refer the matter to the CIA. That had not happened. By
the afternoon, I had the financial records to show that FIVE Generals had
received sizeable kickbacks from that foreign
corporation in the week after the vote to place the order. In addition, I
had the signed confession of one of those men. I did not use threats or
torture to get it. I did use friendly persuasion. Not only did he confess,
but he admitted in writing that there was a conspiracy to ensure that that
Generals got the kickbacks. They had met not just once, but at least twice
to conspire on how to ensure that the order went through. Rumsfeld had
cancelled a competing meeting that had dealt
with national security issues, without explanation. That allowed two further
Generals to attend the
second meeting. There were six Generals at that second meeting, if I
SIX CORRUPT GENERALS RESIGN QUIETLY
The next day they quietly resigned in the face of the investigation. One of
them told me privately but refused to put it in writing that Rumsfeld had
cancelled the competing meeting 'in order for us to organize and get that
artillery approved' for Pentagon purchasing. The next day, that Colonel
brought me ten similar cases, since I had solved that one to his great
satisfaction. It was my last day
at the Pentagon on the assignment to pick up the documents Tenet ordered me
FOREIGN COMPUTERS WITH BUGS SOLD INTO THE PENTAGON FOR KICKBACKS
I did not have time while at the Pentagon to solve them, so I undertook to
mentor the Colonel in how to collect the evidence of the bribes. During the
course of that day he managed to collect
evidence well enough to resolve one of those ten cases ad hoc. The guilty
party also quietly
resigned. He, too, had been bribed by a foreign company. At least, in that
case, the product
worked. It was not a case of the Pentagon ordering the product. It was a
case of him selling
them on the black market from his office inside the Pentagon to other
The product was a foreign (Japanese) lap-top computer. Military secrets were
almost sure to be put on them given the location that they were sold into.
They had not been vetted by the Pentagon to ensure that they did not have a
back door on them to allow the files, conference calls, and voices
within range of them, etc. to be transmitted back to that foreign country.
They were popular at the
Pentagon for their advanced conference video call capacities. I took one of
these computers back to the CIA with me, where it was verified that the
laptop did have the function of acting just like an
advanced bug to steal files, audio, and photographic images.
The optics on it were advanced enough to read documents off the desk of and
wall behind the user! It automatically turned itself on and focused on text.
Even before I verified that the laptop had been designed to steal military
secrets, it was clear from the outer circumstances that that was likely to
be the case. Otherwise, why not sell it into some other location? The laptop
cost a lot more with those advanced spy systems on it than a regular user
could afford. That was why it was only offered for sale inside the Pentagon:
the foreign country was paying so that it could be sold very
cheaply and would out-compete other laptops at the Pentagon.
RUMSFELD BLOCKS INVESTIGATIONS: GREEN LIGHT FOR CONTINUED CORRUPTION
About 500 of those [foreign, specially equipped] laptops had already been
sold at the Pentagon. The Colonel had pressed the Criminal Investigation
Unit to investigate those black market sales.
They had not done so, nor had the matter been referred to the CIA for
investigation. The Criminal Investigation Unit was not willing to press
charges even after being presented with the evidence that the Pentagon
official had taken a foreign bribe. I could not press the issue any further
because Rumsfeld had overruled me. He had already sent the Head of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff (JCS) down to the Criminal Investigation Unit's Head to tell
him not to prosecute the six Generals.
I had called Rumsfeld while he was in his office to protest [but] he had
refused to take my call.
Rumsfeld nixed actual prosecution of our cases but we still managed to get
Rumsfeld blocking the prosecutions gave an ongoing green light to corruption
at the Pentagon.
I did collect the evidence that Rumsfeld sent General Shelton, the Chief of
the JCS, down to
prevent the prosecution of the six Generals. I collected a copy of
Rumsfeld's phone call to
Shelton. In addition, I collected the security camera evidence that General
went down and talked to the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit. The
action that the Head took in not prosecuting the six Generals or the
laptop-selling official speaks for itself as the evidence.
In addition, I collected evidence that that Head of Criminal Investigations
had not prosecuted a number of other corruption cases in which the evidence
of guilt was very abundant and solid. Furthermore, I had collected a van
load of corruption related documents which proved that corruption was
widespread at the Pentagon.
My orders from Tenet were to deliver those documents to the CIA. There was
nothing in those
orders that prevented me from xeroxing as many of them as I could xerox
without delaying that
delivery past the time that Tenet had requested delivery. I had been in the
collecting documents for over thirty years. When doing so will aid national
security, one has a
duty to collect them and try to deal with them in a way that accomplishes
that objective. It should
therefore not surprise anyone, that I had ALL of them xeroxed during the
course of the 10 days
that they were collected. That is, although it was clear to me that I could
not get the corruption
appropriately dealt with at the Pentagon, I still had hopes that one day I'd
be able to somewhere
succeed. There were a number of moving vans removing documents from the
Pentagon on that
day. I had already stated that this was only one of three categories that
Tenet ordered me to
collect. I thus had the cover to load one van full of the copies of the
WHITE HOUSE, TENET, RUMSFELD, JUSTICE, FBI BLOCKED INVESTIGATIONS
The question was where to send it to get the corruption cases prosecuted. I
did not have a good
answer to that. I sent it to an Army base where I trusted the integrity of
the army commander to
secure it, until I did have a good answer to that. It is still intact at
that Army base.
The cases, many of them, have grown old. But as I looked into the matter of
how to get them prosecuted, the facts were not encouraging. The White House
was against it. My boss Tenet was against it. Rumsfeld was against it. The
Head of the Joint Chifs of Staff was against it and the later replacement
was not for it, either.
The Justice Department had not investigated the obvious Halliburton
corruption and put them out of business and some of their personnel in
prison, as it should have done, on the evidence.
Before I left the Pentagon I sent that evidence by courier to the Director
of the FBI. Mr Rumsfeld's corruption was happening in the United States and
it was within the jurisdiction of the FBI, not the CIA to follow through on
it. When the FBI did not act to enforce the law appropriately, that was more
evidence of a conspiracy at levels above Rumseld to allow corruption. That
artillery case should still exist in the files of the Pentagon. That case is
relevant evidence in the larger case of whether the US Administration is
criminally negligent in not prosecuting corruption cases. I allege that it
is, and that its failure to do so has led to the death of US troops from
faulty and shoddy equipment.
The two men who died in the testing of that artillery [piece] should not
have died. Earlier tests of the artillery had shown that it 'jumped' to the
left when fired, nearly 20% of the time. It was a very heavy piece of
equipment. On the earlier tests it had injured about 25 men and sent a
handful of them to the hospital. When the heavy gun jumped as the man looked
through the sighting, it had caused brain concussions and knocked men
Other serious injuries were the result of the artillery falling over onto
the person firing it. In one of those incidents the artillery piece had
caused massive haemorrhaging into the soft tissue of the leg. The man had
had to be hospitalized. If I remember correctly, he had had to undergo
emergency surgery to repair a rupture to his femoral artery. That crush
injury to his artery was so severe that in the medical report I read the
surgeons had considered amputating the leg.
Engineers evaluated the artillery and decreed it 'unsound'. They cited that
it was poorly designed and poorly manufactured. It was made in a foreign
country where manufacturing processes were substandard as a general rule.
They had written that the artillery piece was unstable on its base even when
not being fired. And they had speculated that it jumped to the left because
the quality control at the factory was so poor, that the bore was not
straight. There was not a single reason, not even a cheap price, to
recommend it for purchase by the Pentagon, based upon the objective evidence
that I read. Yet the testing of it were continued, even after it was clear
that it was shoddy equipment and unsafe. That happened because obvious
corruption was not corrected.
DEFECTIVE ARTILLERY PIECE MADE BY PART OF THE CARLYLE GROUP
The maker of the artillery piece was part of the Carlyle Group. That was a
clear conflict of
interest for a sitting President to be making money from weapons that were
being sold to
the Pentagon. It was not until I returned to the CIA that I was able to
confirm that the US
Administration was making money off the sale of that defective artillery
PAYMENTS CHANNELLED VIA CIA SHELL COMPANIES FOR BUSH, RUMSFELD ACCOUNTS
The money made from the sales of the artillery item had a pathway to the
Bush accounts. It took me longer to collect the banking records which linked
the sale of the weapons to the Pentagon, to the exact payment amount into
the Bush accounts. It was while I was writing software to query the CIA's
creative accounting computer that I came across the transactions. CIA shell
companies were used to hide the funnelling of the money from the artillery
manufacturer to Bush's accounts: 9.6% of the Pentagon's payment for the
defective artillery piece ended up in President George W. Bush Jr.'s private
accounts. About 2.4% ended up in Rumsfeld's account.
Rumsfeld had, according to the Pentagon documents that I later obtained,
taken several steps that indicated that he knowingly endangered the men's
lives. His signature was on a memorandum that directed many more of the
artillery pieces to be ordered and 'retested', even though one man had
already died from being crushed beneath it when it jumped to the left. If I
remember correctly, the number ordered was 1,000. It certainly seemed
excessive for testing purposes, given that nearly 20% of the previous batch
had ‘jumped' to the left. The sight for the artillery piece was on the left,
so there was no way to reasonably fire it without being at risk of bodily
FAULTY EQUIPMENT DEATH COVERED UP: DEATH CERTIFICATE FORGED
It was clear that Rumsfeld already knew about the first death; for he had
signed a previous memo ordering people not to talk about it. In addition, he
had taken steps to ensure that the first death was not properly
investigated. I had been told by a Pentagon official who overheard it that
Donald Rumsfeld had told a member of his staff to list the death as an
‘Off-Duty’ death. The official was one of the three I sent in the afternoon
to give his statement. Further proof of that reality was that the form was
signed by a member of Rumsfeld's office. Normally, that form should have
been signed by the dead soldier's Commanding Officer. Rumsfeld had the power
to override that long-established standard operating procedure, but his
staffer signing that form did not.
Since that form should have been signed by a Commanding Officer and the
staffer was not one,
it appeared that Mr Rumsfeld did not sign it, in order to avoid having his
name attached to that
blatant lie. When I checked the Death Certificate, it listed the cause of
death as MVA (for Motor
Vehicle Accident). Yet, many military officers had been at the test and in
the record of the test
they had written that this man had been crushed under the artillery piece.
It also recorded that
he had been sent to the hospital. I verified that the hospital received him
from the ambulance
shortly after the test and that he died at the hospital soon thereafter.
The Death Certificate appeared to be a forgery or faked as it was dated two
days after the hospital records showed that he died. Also I could not find a
physician by the name of the signatory of the death certificate at that
hospital. There was a physician by that name in the United States; he only
worked inside the Pentagon. He was the physician who attended Rumsfeld
whenever he was sick inside the Pentagon, but not when he was outside the
Pentagon. The man who died was stationed on a base in another state: if I
remember correctly, in Maryland at Edgewood Arsenal.
There was no record of his ever being inside the Pentagon: so the Death
Certificate thus appeared to have been signed at the Pentagon with that
cause of death per Donald Rumsfeld's orders. That evidence strongly
suggested that Rumsfeld tried to cover up the death of the first man as
having been due to that artillery piece's defects... The artillery piece was
manufactured by a Saudi Arabian company with close business ties to the Bush
DEFECTIVE FOREIGN EQUIPMENT AND FOREIGN PENETRATION FOR PROFIT
The Saudi Arabian company were having financial trouble because they could
not find a market for their products. Their products had a bad reputation in
the Defense Industry. A video clip I watched at the CIA which showed their
table set up at an outdoor Defense Contractor's Weapon Expo held in Saudi
Arabia, showed that people purposely avoided stopping to look at their
table. It was not a subtle finding. The table next to theirs was doing a
brisk business. I allege that Rumsfeld knew the poor reputation of this
company when he placed the order for about 1000 more of these defective
artillery pieces. The Pentagon keeps lists of its preferred companies, and
of companies to avoid purchasing from. That company was on the Pentagon's
list to avoid. Rumsfeld had to sign a 'waiver' in order to make that
purchase of the artillery that killed that second man. That, in my opinion,
was criminal negligence. And it was criminal negligence in which he
personally took a kickback.
TENET WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY IMPLICATIONS
As to the laptop case, the company making it was Japanese. The case is quite
troubling in light of the violation of US national security. Mr Rumsfeld, by
not investigating and prosecuting corruption cases, left the Pentagon open
to any agent of a foreign power with money in their pocket. Thus his actions
which disabled US national security in practice had both active and passive
I did brief my boss, DCI Tenet, on my findings above after I had determined
their national security implications. He showed no great interest in my
presentation and rushed off in the middle of it.
He declined my invitation to reschedule that briefing twice. It was clear
that he had no intention of seriously trying to correct the problems, even
as they related to the foreign penetration issues at the Pentagon.
1000 TOASTERS COSTING $19.95 SOLD TO PENTAGON BY HALLIBURTON FOR $1,891 EACH
The former high-level veteran CIA aide to Tenet now related a detailed
investigation into a batch of toasters (yes, those breakfast slot machines
that toast bread) which were stolen from a warehouse in Indiana by
operatives employed by a Halliburton subsidiary who were dressed up as FBI
agents, which Halliburton sold to the Pentagon for $1,891 each.
In the course of this investigation, the officer discovered that goods
ordered were not examined physically, but that corrupt ordering was
routinely conducted exclusively on the basis of fabricated, computerised
paperwork. In other words, no-one checked the actual item purchased: they
only handled the paperwork. When challenged in respect of this very
low-value toaster, Halliburton personnel started inventing alibis to the
effect that the toasters were manufactured from titanium and other special
materials, which accounted for their high cost.
The Halliburton-generated list of component parts for these toasters
exceeded 200, whereas when the investigator had one of the units
deconstructed, it was found to consist of 14 separate tawdry sub-components.
This particular corruption investigation became so complex that at one stage
it interfered materially with an investigation that the officer was
conducting into a mole working for an unfriendly government who was carrying
documents out of the Langley front door every day.
When the veteran CIA officer informed Tenet that the investigation into
Halliburton’s fabrications over the toasters was affecting national security
because the urgent necessity of preventing the mole from stealing more
documents was being frustrated daily, he expressed little interest, being
preoccupied only with covering up the Cheney-directed corruption.
THE MOLE CASE THAT WAS LESS IMPORTANT THAN THE TOASTER COVER-UP
We now move to the section of this report which demonstrates that US
national security has been directly and maliciously compromised as a
specific consequence of this corruption, controlled by Unterreichsführer
Cheney. At the time of this posting, it is reported to us that Cheney
remains in detention, but it is not known for what he may be being held, in
addition to his serial corruption in blocking the Settlements. But given
that the Editor of this service has been able to publicise this information,
which was sent to him on 25th May, it is hoped that any intention that may
be floated to release him following the Settlements, or to allow him to
resume his post, is squelched purely on the basis of these allegations.
Consider the extreme gravity of what now follows.
[The former CIA top-flight aide to Tenet had been devoting a huge amount of
time to investigating, and proving out, the ongoing fabrication of invoices
and related documentation on a massive scale in general, and the ludicrous
toaster scandal in particular, when the extreme, immediate urgency of
investigating the mole (who turned out to be a Halliburton employee,
protected by Mr Cheney: see below) was known at the highest level (i.e. by
Tenet himself): and yet this DCI was preoccupied with the necessity of
covering up internal corruption controlled by the Cheney and Rumsfeld gang,
and condoned by the FBI and the Justice Department when the United States’
national security was being severely compromised not least because, knowing
about all this corruption, the Russians had no difficulty in blackmailing
Halliburton employees for their own espionage purposes]:
Now I want to talk more about the mole problem as it is very relevant to
this case. A mole is a person inside an agency who is acting as a traitor to
give secrets to a foreign power. The motives can vary and include bribes or
blackmail. The CIA knew that it had a mole because it knew that the
Russian Embassy in Washington D.C. had recorded the news of just-delivered
I had been assigned by Tenet to investigate who that mole was, starting just
before I was handed
the Halliburton factory problem by 'HallCIA' [an investigation connected
with the issue of ‘phantom factories’, a favourite Halliburton scam: not
covered here]. I was then required by Tenet to keep working on the
Halliburton problem until it was finished at about 2 pm. Then I was
exhausted and went home to sleep. The next day I procured that the FBI with
a warrant would raid a flat looking for CIA documents. I was present at the
raid and we recovered the CIA specifications for the CIA's communication
satellite that NASA had just launched into orbit. That included the security
codes for the encryption algorithms which were set at the time of launch.
The launch took place in the morning after the FBI DID NOT arrest 'HallCIA'
[the CIA veteran's codename for the Halliburton suspect: Ed.] while I was
still forced to work on Halliburton’s book cooking project. Those security
codes meant that someone could change from the ground the
encryption codes to their own codes and then listen in to everything the CIA
said to its stations overseas. In essence, it was like inserting a huge bug
into the CIA and all of its stations. It was an
extremely serious violation of US national security, one of the most serious
in the history of the
CIA, had it not been caught. It was later verified that although the
documents were recovered, the mole had already faxed those security codes
directly to Moscow soon after the launch.
MOLE WAS AN UNVETTED HALLIBURTON EMPLOYEE: FAXED SATELLITE CODES TO MOSCOW
The mole was a Halliburton employee who had never been vetted by the CIA.
The Russians had approached him and offered him money. In addition they had
offered not to expose his criminal background [which they knew all about:
Ed.]. He was clearly a prime candidate for blackmail by the
Russians; keeping his job meant having to hide his felony conviction [see
above: Ed.].The CIA had not run a criminal background check on all of these
Halliburton employees: but, of course, the Russians had. The CIA has rules
that prevent it from hiring drug-takers for the same reason; they are much
too high a blackmail risk, and thus a mole risk. Since the CIA never vetted
the Halliburton people, they never even asked them if they took drugs under
a lie detector test like they normally do. And the CIA never even did drug
tests on the Halliburton people.
CHENEY PROTECTS MOLE WHO SOLD THE SATELLITE'S CODES TO MOSCOW
When I showed Tenet the documents that I recovered from that Halliburton
operative's flat he was shocked. He immediately called the Director of the
FBI and thanked him for his help in recovering
them. I asked Tenet to ask the FBI Director to arrest the Halliburton
traitor. Tenet sent me out of the room to discuss it. He called Mr Cheney.
Cheney told him no, that man was his friend and that they could never arrest
him. The phone was on speaker and I heard everything. I cried for my country
that it had been taken over by crooks who were traitors as well. I could not
stand to stay in such a corrupt institution and under such a grossly corrupt
government. That was the moment in 2002 that I decided to leave my country
[the veteran CIA operative fled to Canada]. After the CIA knew that its new
satellite's security codes had been stolen, it had to figure out what to do
now. It decided that it could not use that satellite because its security
had been too compromised. That satellite cost the US taxpayers over $3.6
billion dollars. It sits in orbit unused.
The man responsible for that was the man I called on these pages 'HallCIA'.
I have not used his real name because Cheney threatened to kill me himself
if I ever mentioned his name or the names of his partners in crime. [This
threat was later supplemented by a further direct threat by Cheney to kill
the officer personally, recorded at the end of this report. It is
interesting that Cheney appears to have been in the habit of threatening to
kill his 'enemies' personally, suggesting that this may not be a new
experience for this sinister character: Ed.].
Editor: The grim summary just given above reveals that the presence inside
both the CIA and the Pentagon of a Halliburton suite of offices is not just
a gross breach of US national security per se, but has actually been
associated with a penetration and security breach of the gravest
proportions, and that Vice President Cheney, informed of this scandal,
refused to allow the arrest of the mole and has presided over this quite
unprecedented degradation of US security. He is therefore a traitor to the
United States on the basis of that one case alone. What more evidence is
'DETENTIONS' MUST BE FOLLOWED BY IMPEACHMENT: NO MORE PREVARICATION
Not only, therefore, have we been justified in stating that the US
Government is run by criminals, but we can now state that there is every
indication that these criminals are directly associated with the gravest
possible breaches of US national security, which clearly mandates that they
should be processed for treason IMMEDIATELY. If Mr Cheney has been or is
being held in the context of the Settlements, treason should be added to his
charge sheet anyway. Under no circumstances should this man ever be
released. Furthermore, his boss should be taken into custody without further
It's no use fretting about whether the Republic can stand such an upheaval
as would ensue from pursuing such a course. The United States is robust and
very mature. Now that these exposures are 'happening', the time has passed
for inaction, or brushing these inconvenient realities under the carpet. The
'failure to confront' can no longer be excused or condoned.
And remember: we have suggested that what is being revealed here cannot
represent more than 1% of what will flood out 'in the wash'. The Editor
recalls the operative, 'working for' Bush Sr., who said: 'None of this must
ever come out, you understand'. Sure, we understood.
The stench of corruption has spread around the world and is especially pongy
in Whitehall, which is why the Editor would like to see some 'real
consequences' in the United States.
Complacent, corrupt Whitehall bureaucrats might then start to get the
But it gets much worse...