Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3158Re: [ufodiscussion] To Don

Expand Messages
  • DRxDON
    Jan 4, 2005
      I am VERY open minded too, Janet, to others' as well as my own feelings.
      Re-read what you wrote here to me and see how YOU are VERY obviously
      *judging* ME! If you can't see this and/or won't admit it, then it is
      YOU who are blind and closed-minded.


      Jahnets wrote:
      >
      > The difference between us Don is that I don't focus on the mistakes people
      > make and unless I know for sure I don't assume it was intentional. I try to
      > look at them from their point of view and give them the benefit of the
      > doubt. That is why I question, to see if I'm missing something so I can
      > fully understand the direction someone is coming from. Only then can I
      > decide if I agree or not. Unfortunately while I'm asking you questions to
      > clarify things for me, I look at things very deeply and most don't look at
      > their own feelings and beliefs as deeply and so get upset with me as it
      > tends to point other things out. But no I don't like to argue. I do like to
      > brainstorm with others and figure things out.
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: DRxDON [mailto:drxdon@...]
      > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 7:27 PM
      > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] To Don
      >
      > Janet,
      >
      > I understand your case and position on it; I said so. I just hope you
      > understand *my* case and position that such "human" terms and judgments,
      > both "negative" AND "positive", *MIGHT* be applicable to at least SOME ET
      > behavior too, NOT that they definitely are.
      >
      > Don
      >
      > Jahnets wrote:
      > >
      > > Don, I was just sharing info that I have with you. Not argueing... It just
      > > so happens that I have noticed this as a problem holding us back from
      > > contact. I realized this and have in the last few days also been talking
      > to
      > > other people about the same. When you wrote that last sentence I thought
      > > there it is again... I'm not on your case. Geez... I am simply trying to
      > > understand all the details of the different discussions and the way people
      > > feel. Why do you think I can point this out Don? Not from logic, from
      > > experience...I kept making the same mistake in a nicer mode but still the
      > > same thing and a being that I talk to kept telling me he wasn't a human. I
      > > finally got it and I'm just trying to share something so it doesn't hold
      > you
      > > or anyone else back... Sorry..;
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: DRxDON [mailto:drxdon@...]
      > > Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 5:49 PM
      > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] To Don
      > >
      > > Janet,
      > >
      > > Yes, I was referring to an example that you used several times before
      > about
      > > spiders. As for a "con" being ONLY a human trait or judgment, how do you
      > > know this? I could just as easily say that ET's are "caring and
      > > benevolent",
      > > and by your logic, THAT could be called ONLY a "human trait" and judgment
      > > also.
      > > By your logic, ALL behavior exhibited by ETs cannot be classified
      > according
      > > to
      > > ANY of our "judgments", either "positive", "negative", or "neutral". And
      > > you
      > > know what? Esentially I agree with you. All we have to go on in
      > assessing
      > > the behavior and motives of ETs is relating such to our own. Therefore,
      > > when
      > > I see behavior of ETs that strongly resembles a particular type of *human*
      > > behavior, I am apt to clasify such behavior the way I see it. That is, I
      > > will
      > > tend to classify it in *human* terms, with the caveat that I may be wrong
      > > just
      > > because they are ETs and may be operating under quite different
      > motivations
      > > than
      > > us. In the quoted part of my post I DID say that they *COULD* be acting
      > > like a
      > > "con", not that they *were* DEFINITIVELY acting that way. I said that it
      > > was
      > > *possible*.
      > >
      > > Intuitively, though, I would have to say that the whole gamut of human
      > > emotions
      > > from altruism and love to deception and abuse certainly *could* and
      > probably
      > > do
      > > exist at ALL "levels" of consciouness/reality. Therefore, I see a "con"
      > and
      > > deception as being highly likely in *certain* circumstances. My "gut
      > > instincts"
      > > tell me so. ;-)
      > >
      > > BTW, why didn't you comment on the rest of my post in which I essentially
      > > agree
      > > with you and expanded on some of your ideas? It seems to me that you
      > enjoy
      > > arguing. Excuse me if I am wrong about this perception of you, but I do
      > NOT
      > > enjoy arguments for their own sake. I haven't paid for the five minute
      > nor
      > > the
      > > ten minute argument. ;-)
      > >
      > > Don
      > >
      > > Jahnets wrote:
      > > >
      > > > "However, the point you made about people's "irrational" fear of things
      > > > like spiders(EEWW! I really do HATE spiders! lol) makes sense too. Once
      > > > one understands that the spider is probably much more afraid of you than
      > > > you are of it and has no "predatory" intentions toward you, then you can
      > > > approach the situation with much more reason. Again, though, when
      > > something
      > > > IS *truly* predatory, I think that we can sense it to our bones. Your
      > > > explanation about the spider may be true but it could also be true that
      > a
      > > > "predator" can, through continued and repetitive contact, gain one's
      > > "false"
      > > > confidence like a con man and convince one that they are not a
      > predator."
      > > >
      > > > Don, I didn't say anything about spiders here so this must be from a
      > long
      > > > time ago??? However that last sentence is exactly what I feel is a human
      > > > judgement. They aren't human and don't act like us... See what I mean.
      > > Just
      > > > because humans are cons doesn't mean another race will act in a like
      > > manner.
      > > > They aren't human. ;-)
      > > >
      > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > From: DRxDON [mailto:drxdon@...]
      > > > Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 1:54 AM
      > > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] To Don
      > > >
      > > > Janet,
      > > >
      > > > I don't remember the squirrel in Taken, then I didn't see every episode
      > > all
      > > > the way through. As for that feeling of fear when they are approaching,
      > I
      > > > have several *possible* explanations for it. Primarily, I still go back
      > > to
      > > > the "truth" within our basic instincts. Just because they are
      > "primitive"
      > > > doesn't mean that they are wrong or "outdated". They are very often
      > > right.
      > > > They always say that "first impressions" that one has of someone are
      > most
      > > > often correct; something just doesn't "feel right" about them.
      > > >
      > > > However, the point you made about people's "irrational" fear of things
      > > > like spiders(EEWW! I really do HATE spiders! lol) makes sense too. Once
      > > > one understands that the spider is probably much more afraid of you than
      > > > you are of it and has no "predatory" intentions toward you, then you can
      > > > approach the situation with much more reason. Again, though, when
      > > something
      > > > IS *truly* predatory, I think that we can sense it to our bones. Your
      > > > explanation about the spider may be true but it could also be true that
      > a
      > > > "predator" can, through continued and repetitive contact, gain one's
      > > "false"
      > > > confidence like a con man and convince one that they are not a predator.
      > > >
      > > > In the case of your relationship with your Grey, though, I DID say that
      > I
      > > > thought it quite plausible that there are a number of greys that want to
      > > > regain more human based emotions which they had lost, as in Spielberg's
      > > > "Taken". Yours may be one of the more successful ones in this endeavor.
      > > >
      > > > I agree with you about the intensity of the original fear probably being
      > > > *primarily* a result of the "force" released when the "dimensional door"
      > > > is opened. It is why all the dogs start barking and howling when there
      > is
      > > > a close encounter taking place. I said that I sensed they actually are
      > > > responsible for "creating and directing" time itself. If this is so,
      > > since
      > > > our ego consciousness is so fixated upon "time", it would be no wonder
      > > that
      > > > an initial close psychological contact with them would make one feel
      > like
      > > > their very ego identity were being "torn apart", as many abductees
      > > describe.
      > > > Afterall, the person is entering a realm wherein linear time starts to
      > > break
      > > > up, so too then does the ego feel the same. Again, I'm not sure that
      > this
      > > > is
      > > > intentional on the entities' part; it may just be incidental as part of
      > > the
      > > > contact experience as I described above. However, I still feel that
      > they
      > > > (most of them, anyway) have lost the empathy to truly understand the
      > > effect
      > > > that this has on people. Again, I think that "Taken" paints a fairly
      > good
      > > > picture of their basic psychology.
      > > >
      > > > As for your "nanite" question in your other post, I have never heard of
      > > the
      > > > "bite marks" that you describe.
      > > >
      > > > Don
      > > >
      > > > Jahnets wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > One more thing Don, that feeling you got when you knew they were
      > > coming...
      > > > > That feeling of overwhelming fear... I understand that as I used to
      > get
      > > it
      > > > > too. For some time I worked on getting over that. I would want to talk
      > > to
      > > > > them and still my body would react that way. It took me some time to
      > get
      > > > > over the flight or fright syndrome and I think I figured it out. It is
      > > > when
      > > > > they come into our dimension. Somehow the opening causes it. I'm
      > pretty
      > > > > sure... It's either that or the energy field around them. It's like a
      > > > > natural fear response in your body to an overload of energy. Did you
      > see
      > > > > Taken? I bet you really had a reaction the the squirrel huh...
      > > > >
      > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > From: DRxDON [mailto:drxdon@...]
      > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 5:38 PM
      > > > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] To Don
      > > > >
      > > > > I saw "finger puppet people", which are sometimes screen memories of
      > > > Greys.
      > > > > When I read
      > > > > of other reports of alien abduction hidden as dreams, these peopole
      > > > > described similar
      > > > > stories as mine and their abductors/visitors were Greys. It's true; I
      > > > don't
      > > > > know for sure
      > > > > what kind of beings they were. I've even entertained the possibility
      > > that
      > > > > this could have
      > > > > all been a part of an MK-ULTRA mind control experiment by the
      > > government.
      > > > I
      > > > > have all the
      > > > > "markers" for that too: father an ex-military man; mother treated for
      > > > > multiple mental
      > > > > disorders in a hospital that was given funding by the CIA at that
      > time;
      > > I
      > > > > lived a quarter
      > > > > mile from a Naval Air Station. I admit, I don't know for sure what
      > even
      > > > > actually hppened,
      > > > > or whether I was even abducted. As for the rest of my
      > > > stories/speculations,
      > > > > I'm just going
      > > > > on intuition and what I have read in numerous reports. Again, I'm
      > just
      > > > > telling my *OWN*
      > > > > feelings/ideas/speculations on this subject overall; I admit I may be
      > > > wrong.
      > > > > However, *right
      > > > > now* I strongly feel that I'm on the right track.
      > > > >
      > > > > Jahnets wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I'm confused about something Don, I thought you didn't see the
      > beings
      > > > but
      > > > > > were scared by a light and then had missing time? If so how do you
      > > know
      > > > > what
      > > > > > kind of beings they were???
      > > > > >
      > > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > > From: DRxDON [mailto:drxdon@...]
      > > > > > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 6:35 PM
      > > > > > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] To Don
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Yes Dex, I know that you see things differently. However, I have
      > > strong
      > > > > > "instincts"
      > > > > > that I trust very well. I sensed a VERY palpable feeling of
      > "menace"
      > > > that
      > > > > > was much
      > > > > > different, as I stated, than just a small boy being afraid of
      > > something
      > > > > > unknown. If
      > > > > > they were trying to "tease" me, they obviously had no understanding
      > of
      > > > > human
      > > > > > psychology.
      > > > > > This is quite possible too, as the way I see it, these beings have
      > > lost
      > > > > > their contact
      > > > > > with the "Source" and thereby their sense of compassion and empathy
      > > with
      > > > > > other beings.
      > > > > > As I said, I think that the Spielberg series "Taken" does a fairly
      > > good
      > > > > job
      > > > > > of describing
      > > > > > their psychology,..almost. They may have had some lost feeble
      > notion
      > > of
      > > > > > what "teasing"
      > > > > > is, but the fact that they had no telepathic empathic understanding
      > of
      > > > the
      > > > > > terror which
      > > > > > they were inspiring within me showed their true lack of
      > understanding.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Such "negative" beings, as see these entities, may have their place
      > in
      > > > our
      > > > > > overall
      > > > > > "training" as an "ordeal by fire", however that doesn't change their
      > > > true
      > > > > > nature. It
      > > > > > doesn't mean that they had any *personal* intent on their own to
      > > > > "enlighten"
      > > > > > me. Nor
      > > > > > does it mean that they have any idea whatsoever about any kind of
      > > "role"
      > > > > > that they are
      > > > > > playing in our own development. The Hindu Bagavaghita describes
      > such
      > > > > > entities perfectly
      > > > > > as the "Asuras"; beings with vast technological knowledge and power
      > > but
      > > > > > "filled with
      > > > > > darkness"(spiritual ignorance). They are "desperate" entities
      > trying
      > > to
      > > > > > maintain their
      > > > > > existence. Any benefit or "enlightenment" that we may gain though
      > our
      > > > > > contact or
      > > > > > experience with them is either purely incidental or a result of our
      > > own
      > > > > > reactive survival
      > > > > > insticts, as when people become "stronger" and more spiritually
      > serene
      > > > > after
      > > > > > living throgh
      > > > > > some disaster or catastrophe.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I don't believe in "God", though I do believe in something like the
      > > > > "Force"
      > > > > > in Star Wars.
      > > > > > There are many "gods", in my view; some "greater", some "lessser".
      > We
      > > > may
      > > > > > be the resultant
      > > > > > "product" of an "Orignal Greater god" who had some kind of "plan"
      > for
      > > > us,
      > > > > > but many other
      > > > > > "lesser gods" have interfered since. And also, because of our own
      > > FREE
      > > > > > WILL, we have LONG
      > > > > > since deviated from any such "Original Plan" and there is no turning
      > > > back
      > > > > > now. We are our
      > > > > > OWN gods, as the Serpent lead us to believe and as Jesus himself
      > > > > encouraged
      > > > > > us to realize.
      > > > > > The only way for our "salvation" now is to realize and *actualize*
      > our
      > > > own
      > > > > > GODHOOD,..the
      > > > > > sooner the better.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Dex, you seem to believe that you have a vast metaphysical
      > > understanding
      > > > > > because of your
      > > > > > experiences. You have been with the "angels" and the "Hosts" and
      > they
      > > > > have
      > > > > > told you much.
      > > > > > I myself believe...(that word) that I too have a vast metaphysical
      > > > > > understanding but I have
      > > > > > NEVER been instructed by ANY "angels", "Hosts", or beings of any
      > kind.
      > > > My
      > > > > > understanding
      > > > > > comes from ***WITHIN*** and I trust it quite well.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Don
      > > > > >
      > > > > > dexxxaa wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > I would run around the house and hide
      > > > > > > under tables and in corners but the light would follow me as if it
      > > > > > > were "taunting" me.
      > > > > > > *****************
      > > > > > > Note my differing attitude. It may make a difference.
      > > > > > > How about 'teasing' you instead. Kinder. More connected.
      > > > > > > What kind of difference you might be thinking? Deep...unable to
      > > > > > > comply... I can't describe it, but I believe it makes a differenc
      > in
      > > > > > > our training here. Who's doing the training and why? What is this
      > > > > > > training? Cultivating the 'seed of Life'? I've learned most of the
      > > > > > > time it's "God" working through it's 'Host'.
      > > > > > > Dex
      > > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > > --------------------
      > > > > > -------------------------------------------
      > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufodiscussion/
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > > > > > ufodiscussion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
      > > > > Service.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > --
      > > > > > What If --------------------------?
      > > > > > DRxDON
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > --------------------
      > > > > -------------------------------------------
      > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > > >
      > > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufodiscussion/
      > > > > >
      > > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > > > > ufodiscussion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > >
      > > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
      > > > Service.
      > > > >
      > > > > --
      > > > > What If --------------------------?
      > > > > DRxDON
      > > > >
      > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > --------------------
      > > > -------------------------------------------
      > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > >
      > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufodiscussion/
      > > > >
      > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > > > ufodiscussion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > > > >
      > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
      > > Service.
      > > >
      > > > --
      > > > What If --------------------------?
      > > > DRxDON
      > > >
      > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > >
      > --------------------
      > > -------------------------------------------
      > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufodiscussion/
      > > >
      > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > > ufodiscussion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > > >
      > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
      > Service.
      > >
      > > --
      > > What If --------------------------?
      > > DRxDON
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > > --------------------
      > -------------------------------------------
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufodiscussion/
      > >
      > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > > ufodiscussion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > >
      > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
      >
      > --
      > What If --------------------------?
      > DRxDON
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      > ---------------------------------------------------------------
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufodiscussion/
      >
      > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > ufodiscussion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      >
      > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


      --
      What If --------------------------?
      DRxDON
    • Show all 21 messages in this topic