Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

13274Re: [ufodiscussion] Re: President Barack H. Obama Wins Nobel Peace Award!

Expand Messages
  • Ted
    Oct 15, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Just keep up the great work. When you right the way you do, your words are
      as if I wrote it , but not as eloquently

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: <masanga@...>
      To: <ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:14 PM
      Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] Re: President Barack H. Obama Wins Nobel Peace

      > Thanks Ted. You are too kind. But your appreciation makes the
      > effort worthwhile.
      > Regan
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: Ted
      > To: ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:16 PM
      > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] Re: President Barack H. Obama Wins Nobel
      > Peace
      > Award!
      > You do that soooo well. STANDING APPLAUSE
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: <masanga@...>
      > To: <ufodiscussion@yahoogroups.com>
      > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:17 PM
      > Subject: Re: [ufodiscussion] Re: President Barack H. Obama Wins Nobel
      > Peace
      > Award!
      >> To anyone who was familiar with some of the psychological maladies
      >> to which human beings are prone, George Bush Jr would have rung alarm
      >> bells
      >> in their mind when he ended his first inaugural speech at the beginning
      >> of
      >> 2001 with the bizarre, if immortal words, "And an angel still rides in
      >> the
      >> whirlwind and directs this storm." His words sounded way offbeam because
      >> there was no "storm" in the world at that time for any angel to ride in
      >> or
      >> direct. But George Jr himself soon produced one and by so doing plunged
      >> the
      >> world into the violent anarchy and chaos with which we are all now
      >> tragically familiar. Bush Jr was a textbook case of megalomania, as his
      >> subsequent career demonstrated to the letter. He was frequently
      >> described
      >> in the alternative media (i.e. the media not owned by his cronies) as
      >> having
      >> "a Napoleon complex", although personally I always thought that the Roman
      >> Emperor Nero would have made a closer fit since he thought of himself as
      >> a
      >> deity and George Jr seems to have had similar, if not exactly the same
      >> pretentions.
      >> Why is it that all emperors are mad? Even if they start off with
      >> all their marbles apparently intact they all seem to go stark staring
      >> bonkers during their reigns. The Roman Emperor Caligula is probably a
      >> good
      >> example of that phenomenon. (He is the one who made his horse a
      >> senator.)
      >> And after thousands of years of imperial craziness manifesting on the
      >> world
      >> scene, which you would think might teach us all that creating empires
      >> with
      >> emperors to rule over them is actually not a very good idea, still
      >> humanity
      >> keeps generating new empires and new would-be emperors to rule over them
      >> by
      >> the minute. No matter how idealistic, libertarian-spirited, peace-loving
      >> and prosperous a republic might be, it seems that its citizens will
      >> eventually reject that model of political organisation and turn their
      >> hard-won republic into an empire so that the dramatic spectacle of a
      >> megalomaniac emperor being humiliated by the gods can be acted out in
      >> human
      >> experience over and over again.
      >> This is exactly what seems to many observers to have happened to
      >> the
      >> USA during the Bush Jr presidency, just like it happened to the
      >> pre-imperial
      >> republic of Ancient Rome. As everybody was celebrating the in-coming New
      >> Year of 2006, the US President George W. Bush quietly declared that he no
      >> longer considered himself to be bound by the Constitution of the United
      >> States of America and would govern without regard to its contents
      >> henceforward. That declaration has never been so much as challenged, let
      >> alone overturned, in any court nor in the US Congress and so in that
      >> fateful
      >> moment Bush gave himself absolute powers over the USA and changed it from
      >> being a republic into a de facto empire with himself as its emperor. By
      >> default the citizens of the USA have already accepted their new,
      >> diminished
      >> status as subjects of the absolute imperial US President. As far as any
      >> US
      >> President needs to be concerned, the US Constitution can now be treated
      >> as
      >> just "a goddam piece of paper!" with total impunity.
      >> You might expect perhaps that one of the first things on the new,
      >> in-coming President Obama's agenda upon taking office would be to reverse
      >> this appalling transformation of the US Republic that Bush Jr had wrought
      >> and restore the rule of the Constitution and the status of his fellow
      >> Americans as citizens of the Republic. But no. Obama has kept quiet
      >> about
      >> the whole tragedy and has simply stepped into the Presidency left to him
      >> by
      >> former Pres. Bush unchanged and without any declared intention to change
      >> it
      >> either. In short, Obama has accepted the role of new Emperor of the
      >> United
      >> States of America and all its dominions around the globe.
      >> Obama-lovers may believe that in his case being the absolute ruler
      >> of the USA is no bad thing and is even a very good thing because he is an
      >> exceptionally benign ruler and being so powerful will enable him to bring
      >> the desperately-needed "change we can believe in" that he promised to
      >> everyone. But already the signs of imperial megalomania are starting to
      >> appear. Take for example this statement abstracted from his acceptance
      >> speech for his Nobel Peace Prize:
      >> “I am the Commander-in-Chief of a country that's … working … to
      >> confront a ruthless adversary that directly threatens the American people
      >> and our allies.”
      >> (See http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23724.htm - 9th
      >> paragraph down)
      >> Commander-in-Chief? Of a democracy??? Who is he to COMMAND "a
      >> free
      >> people, one nation under God"? And where does he get the inflated idea
      >> that
      >> this is the role to which he was elected? Already he appears to be
      >> getting
      >> above himself and is unconsciously putting his delusions of imperial
      >> grandeur on display. Clearly Pres. Obama sees himself as the people's
      >> ruler, not their servant. In his eyes it appears that he is the people's
      >> boss. But in a democracy, the people are their own boss. In a
      >> democratic
      >> republic the people are not there to take commands from their President.
      >> The President is there to take the people's commands and carry them out.
      >> If
      >> the Republic still exists then Obama has got the wrong end of the stick
      >> about what his role is as President. But of course, if the Republic has
      >> been replaced by an empire and he is really the new de facto Emperor then
      >> he
      >> is right and it is the people who have got the wrong end of the stick.
      >> Either way it looks like a bad omen to me, I'm afraid. It must
      >> also
      >> be giving our ET visitors pause for thought too, I would imagine. How
      >> can
      >> they form meaningful relationships with earth-humanity when it is
      >> embroiled
      >> in archaic imperial psychodramas that have brought down one civilization
      >> after another in this planet's long and sordid history?
      >> Regan
      >> ------------------------------------
      > ------------------------------------
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
    • Show all 16 messages in this topic