Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Invitation to Games - 28 Dec

Expand Messages
  • Richard Pardoe
    LAST WEEK: We welcomed Nick and Stephanie who stopped lurking and decided to join for games. With seven players and wanting to have everyone involved, it
    Message 1 of 10 , Dec 25, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      Invitation to Games - 28 Dec

      LAST WEEK:

      We welcomed Nick and Stephanie who stopped lurking and decided to join for games.  With seven players and wanting to have everyone involved, it seemed only natural to bring out 7 WONDERS We played a first game with the A-Sides of the Wonders then repeated the game with the B-Sides.  In the first game, Nick was an economic engine garnering gold hand over first.  But Nick didnt forget to balance his objectives building a chain of civil (blue) buildings for VPs as well as capitalizing on some nice guilds:

      (Scores are per the provided scorepad: military (red) + money + wonder + civil (blue) + trade (yellow) + guilds (purple)  + science (green))

      Nick:  -5 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 5 + 12 + 0 = 49

      Lawr:  9 + 5 + 10 + 13 + 3 + 0 + 4 = 44

      Steph:  9 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 18 = 43

      Ben:  3 + 0 + 15 + 17 + 0 + 0 + 8 = 43

      Tim:  3 + 4 + 3 + 18 + 8 + 6 + 0 = 42

      Dave:  5 + 3 + 10 + 11 + 0 + 9 + 0 = 38

      Rich:  0 + 1 + 10 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 13 = 36

      In our second game, Rich (with the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus) aimed to build his wonder on the last card of each age to lay claim to the discards for his free build.  This allowed him to get a complete science set in the first Age which then lead to several natural builds in the later ages.  But would a push in science (3 sets of 3) be enough against a more balanced build?  Nope, Stephanie nicely balances for the win:

      Steph:  13 + 7 + 7 + 14 + 7 + 15 + 0 = 63

      Rich:  -2 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 0 + 0 + 48 = 58

      Nick:  -6 + 10 + 10 + 23 + 4 + 15 + 0 = 56

      Dave:  18 + 6 + 7 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 54

      Tim:  -5 + 4 + 3 + 14 + 2 + 5 + 25= 48

      Ben:  11 + 2 + 13 + 3 + 3 + 6 + 2 = 40

      Lawr:  9 + 1 + 5 + 9 + 2 + 11 + 1 = 38

      I hope Nick and Stephanie enjoyed our game(s) and consider coming back again.  Our (pseudo) tradition of newcomers winning seems to have worked its magic again.

      THIS WEEK:

      It is the quiet week between holidays, so dont know who is in town and available for games.  Looking back at the past few weeks attendance, we appear to have made a step jump up in attendance having more than 5 around the table more often than not.   As there are more games that can be enjoyed with 3 or 4 players, I think the group needs to consider splitting up for a couple of games if the attendance remains high.  Normally, I have been explaining the games, but if we do split up, I will be looking for volunteers to help with the second games introduction.  But perhaps this is all putting the cart before the horse or counting chickens before they have hatched.  Lets focus on this week and see what happens and adjust accordingly.

      Who is in town and able to attend for…..

              GAMES:

              ***************************************

              Wednesday Night, 18:30 to ~21:00
              My house in San Ramon
              (Contact me off-list if you need directions)

              ***************************************

      -       Rich

    • Timothy Henson
      I ll be there. -Tim ... From: Richard Pardoe Subject: [trivalleygamers] Invitation to Games - 28 Dec To: trivalleygamers@yahoogroups.com
      Message 2 of 10 , Dec 25, 2011
      • 0 Attachment
        I'll be there.

        -Tim

        --- On Sun, 12/25/11, Richard Pardoe <RPardoe@...> wrote:

        From: Richard Pardoe <RPardoe@...>
        Subject: [trivalleygamers] Invitation to Games - 28 Dec
        To: trivalleygamers@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Sunday, December 25, 2011, 9:46 PM

         

        LAST WEEK:

        We welcomed Nick and Stephanie who stopped lurking and decided to join for games.  With seven players and wanting to have everyone involved, it seemed only natural to bring out 7 WONDERS We played a first game with the A-Sides of the Wonders then repeated the game with the B-Sides.  In the first game, Nick was an economic engine garnering gold hand over first.  But Nick didnt forget to balance his objectives building a chain of civil (blue) buildings for VPs as well as capitalizing on some nice guilds:

        (Scores are per the provided scorepad: military (red) + money + wonder + civil (blue) + trade (yellow) + guilds (purple)  + science (green))

        Nick:  -5 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 5 + 12 + 0 = 49

        Lawr:  9 + 5 + 10 + 13 + 3 + 0 + 4 = 44

        Steph:  9 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 18 = 43

        Ben:  3 + 0 + 15 + 17 + 0 + 0 + 8 = 43

        Tim:  3 + 4 + 3 + 18 + 8 + 6 + 0 = 42

        Dave:  5 + 3 + 10 + 11 + 0 + 9 + 0 = 38

        Rich:  0 + 1 + 10 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 13 = 36

        In our second game, Rich (with the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus) aimed to build his wonder on the last card of each age to lay claim to the discards for his free build.  This allowed him to get a complete science set in the first Age which then lead to several natural builds in the later ages.  But would a push in science (3 sets of 3) be enough against a more balanced build?  Nope, Stephanie nicely balances for the win:

        Steph:  13 + 7 + 7 + 14 + 7 + 15 + 0 = 63

        Rich:  -2 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 0 + 0 + 48 = 58

        Nick:  -6 + 10 + 10 + 23 + 4 + 15 + 0 = 56

        Dave:  18 + 6 + 7 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 54

        Tim:  -5 + 4 + 3 + 14 + 2 + 5 + 25= 48

        Ben:  11 + 2 + 13 + 3 + 3 + 6 + 2 = 40

        Lawr:  9 + 1 + 5 + 9 + 2 + 11 + 1 = 38

        I hope Nick and Stephanie enjoyed our game(s) and consider coming back again.  Our (pseudo) tradition of newcomers winning seems to have worked its magic again.

        THIS WEEK:

        It is the quiet week between holidays, so dont know who is in town and available for games.  Looking back at the past few weeks attendance, we appear to have made a step jump up in attendance having more than 5 around the table more often than not.   As there are more games that can be enjoyed with 3 or 4 players, I think the group needs to consider splitting up for a couple of games if the attendance remains high.  Normally, I have been explaining the games, but if we do split up, I will be looking for volunteers to help with the second games introduction.  But perhaps this is all putting the cart before the horse or counting chickens before they have hatched.  Lets focus on this week and see what happens and adjust accordingly.

        Who is in town and able to attend for…..

                GAMES:

                ***************************************

                Wednesday Night, 18:30 to ~21:00
                My house in San Ramon
                (Contact me off-list if you need directions)

                ***************************************

        -       Rich

      • Dave
        As I thought, I m going to miss this week. But I ll be ready for you all next week. Dave
        Message 3 of 10 , Dec 26, 2011
        • 0 Attachment
          As I thought, I'm going to miss this week. But I'll be ready for you all next week.

          Dave


          --- In trivalleygamers@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Pardoe" <RPardoe@...> wrote:
          >
          > LAST WEEK:
          > We welcomed Nick and Stephanie who stopped lurking and decided to join for
          > games. With seven players and wanting to have everyone involved, it seemed
          > only natural to bring out 7 WONDERS. We played a first game with the
          > A-Sides of the Wonders then repeated the game with the B-Sides. In the
          > first game, Nick was an economic engine garnering gold hand over first. But
          > Nick didn't forget to balance his objectives building a chain of civil
          > (blue) buildings for VPs as well as capitalizing on some nice guilds:
          > (Scores are per the provided scorepad: military (red) + money + wonder +
          > civil (blue) + trade (yellow) + guilds (purple) + science (green))
          > Nick: -5 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 5 + 12 + 0 = 49
          > Lawr: 9 + 5 + 10 + 13 + 3 + 0 + 4 = 44
          > Steph: 9 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 18 = 43
          > Ben: 3 + 0 + 15 + 17 + 0 + 0 + 8 = 43
          > Tim: 3 + 4 + 3 + 18 + 8 + 6 + 0 = 42
          > Dave: 5 + 3 + 10 + 11 + 0 + 9 + 0 = 38
          > Rich: 0 + 1 + 10 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 13 = 36
          > In our second game, Rich (with the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus) aimed to
          > build his wonder on the last card of each age to lay claim to the discards
          > for his free build. This allowed him to get a complete science set in the
          > first Age which then lead to several natural builds in the later ages. But
          > would a push in science (3 sets of 3) be enough against a more balanced
          > build? Nope, Stephanie nicely balances for the win:
          > Steph: 13 + 7 + 7 + 14 + 7 + 15 + 0 = 63
          > Rich: -2 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 0 + 0 + 48 = 58
          > Nick: -6 + 10 + 10 + 23 + 4 + 15 + 0 = 56
          > Dave: 18 + 6 + 7 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 54
          > Tim: -5 + 4 + 3 + 14 + 2 + 5 + 25= 48
          > Ben: 11 + 2 + 13 + 3 + 3 + 6 + 2 = 40
          > Lawr: 9 + 1 + 5 + 9 + 2 + 11 + 1 = 38
          > I hope Nick and Stephanie enjoyed our game(s) and consider coming back
          > again. Our (pseudo) tradition of newcomer's winning seems to have worked
          > its magic again.
          > THIS WEEK:
          > It is the quiet week between holidays, so don't know who is in town and
          > available for games. Looking back at the past few weeks attendance, we
          > appear to have made a step jump up in attendance having more than 5 around
          > the table more often than not. As there are more games that can be enjoyed
          > with 3 or 4 players, I think the group needs to consider splitting up for a
          > couple of games if the attendance remains high. Normally, I have been
          > explaining the games, but if we do split up, I will be looking for
          > volunteers to help with the second game's introduction. But perhaps this is
          > all putting the cart before the horse or counting chickens before they have
          > hatched. Let's focus on this week and see what happens and adjust
          > accordingly.
          > Who is in town and able to attend for...
          > GAMES:
          > ***************************************
          > Wednesday Night, 18:30 to ~21:00
          > My house in San Ramon
          > (Contact me off-list if you need directions)
          > ***************************************
          > - Rich
          >
        • Jeff Hammond
          I ll be there. Jeff ... I ll be there. Jeff On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Richard Pardoe wrote:   LAS T WEEK: We welcomed Nick and
          Message 4 of 10 , Dec 26, 2011
          • 0 Attachment
            I'll be there.
            Jeff

            On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Richard Pardoe <RPardoe@...> wrote:
             

            LAST WEEK:

            We welcomed Nick and Stephanie who stopped lurking and decided to join for games.  With seven players and wanting to have everyone involved, it seemed only natural to bring out 7 WONDERS We played a first game with the A-Sides of the Wonders then repeated the game with the B-Sides.  In the first game, Nick was an economic engine garnering gold hand over first.  But Nick didnt forget to balance his objectives building a chain of civil (blue) buildings for VPs as well as capitalizing on some nice guilds:

            (Scores are per the provided scorepad: military (red) + money + wonder + civil (blue) + trade (yellow) + guilds (purple)  + science (green))

            Nick:  -5 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 5 + 12 + 0 = 49

            Lawr:  9 + 5 + 10 + 13 + 3 + 0 + 4 = 44

            Steph:  9 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 18 = 43

            Ben:  3 + 0 + 15 + 17 + 0 + 0 + 8 = 43

            Tim:  3 + 4 + 3 + 18 + 8 + 6 + 0 = 42

            Dave:  5 + 3 + 10 + 11 + 0 + 9 + 0 = 38

            Rich:  0 + 1 + 10 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 13 = 36

            In our second game, Rich (with the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus) aimed to build his wonder on the last card of each age to lay claim to the discards for his free build.  This allowed him to get a complete science set in the first Age which then lead to several natural builds in the later ages.  But would a push in science (3 sets of 3) be enough against a more balanced build?  Nope, Stephanie nicely balances for the win:

            Steph:  13 + 7 + 7 + 14 + 7 + 15 + 0 = 63

            Rich:  -2 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 0 + 0 + 48 = 58

            Nick:  -6 + 10 + 10 + 23 + 4 + 15 + 0 = 56

            Dave:  18 + 6 + 7 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 54

            Tim:  -5 + 4 + 3 + 14 + 2 + 5 + 25= 48

            Ben:  11 + 2 + 13 + 3 + 3 + 6 + 2 = 40

            Lawr:  9 + 1 + 5 + 9 + 2 + 11 + 1 = 38

            I hope Nick and Stephanie enjoyed our game(s) and consider coming back again.  Our (pseudo) tradition of newcomers winning seems to have worked its magic again.

            THIS WEEK:

            It is the quiet week between holidays, so dont know who is in town and available for games.  Looking back at the past few weeks attendance, we appear to have made a step jump up in attendance having more than 5 around the table more often than not.   As there are more games that can be enjoyed with 3 or 4 players, I think the group needs to consider splitting up for a couple of games if the attendance remains high.  Normally, I have been explaining the games, but if we do split up, I will be looking for volunteers to help with the second games introduction.  But perhaps this is all putting the cart before the horse or counting chickens before they have hatched.  Lets focus on this week and see what happens and adjust accordingly.

            Who is in town and able to attend for…..

                    GAMES:

                    ***************************************

                    Wednesday Night, 18:30 to ~21:00
                    My house in San Ramon
                    (Contact me off-list if you need directions)

                    ***************************************

            -       Rich


          • beeben22
            I can join you in games. Ben
            Message 5 of 10 , Dec 26, 2011
            • 0 Attachment
              I can join you in games. Ben

              --- In trivalleygamers@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Pardoe" <RPardoe@...> wrote:
              >
              > LAST WEEK:
              > We welcomed Nick and Stephanie who stopped lurking and decided to join for
              > games. With seven players and wanting to have everyone involved, it seemed
              > only natural to bring out 7 WONDERS. We played a first game with the
              > A-Sides of the Wonders then repeated the game with the B-Sides. In the
              > first game, Nick was an economic engine garnering gold hand over first. But
              > Nick didn't forget to balance his objectives building a chain of civil
              > (blue) buildings for VPs as well as capitalizing on some nice guilds:
              > (Scores are per the provided scorepad: military (red) + money + wonder +
              > civil (blue) + trade (yellow) + guilds (purple) + science (green))
              > Nick: -5 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 5 + 12 + 0 = 49
              > Lawr: 9 + 5 + 10 + 13 + 3 + 0 + 4 = 44
              > Steph: 9 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 18 = 43
              > Ben: 3 + 0 + 15 + 17 + 0 + 0 + 8 = 43
              > Tim: 3 + 4 + 3 + 18 + 8 + 6 + 0 = 42
              > Dave: 5 + 3 + 10 + 11 + 0 + 9 + 0 = 38
              > Rich: 0 + 1 + 10 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 13 = 36
              > In our second game, Rich (with the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus) aimed to
              > build his wonder on the last card of each age to lay claim to the discards
              > for his free build. This allowed him to get a complete science set in the
              > first Age which then lead to several natural builds in the later ages. But
              > would a push in science (3 sets of 3) be enough against a more balanced
              > build? Nope, Stephanie nicely balances for the win:
              > Steph: 13 + 7 + 7 + 14 + 7 + 15 + 0 = 63
              > Rich: -2 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 0 + 0 + 48 = 58
              > Nick: -6 + 10 + 10 + 23 + 4 + 15 + 0 = 56
              > Dave: 18 + 6 + 7 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 54
              > Tim: -5 + 4 + 3 + 14 + 2 + 5 + 25= 48
              > Ben: 11 + 2 + 13 + 3 + 3 + 6 + 2 = 40
              > Lawr: 9 + 1 + 5 + 9 + 2 + 11 + 1 = 38
              > I hope Nick and Stephanie enjoyed our game(s) and consider coming back
              > again. Our (pseudo) tradition of newcomer's winning seems to have worked
              > its magic again.
              > THIS WEEK:
              > It is the quiet week between holidays, so don't know who is in town and
              > available for games. Looking back at the past few weeks attendance, we
              > appear to have made a step jump up in attendance having more than 5 around
              > the table more often than not. As there are more games that can be enjoyed
              > with 3 or 4 players, I think the group needs to consider splitting up for a
              > couple of games if the attendance remains high. Normally, I have been
              > explaining the games, but if we do split up, I will be looking for
              > volunteers to help with the second game's introduction. But perhaps this is
              > all putting the cart before the horse or counting chickens before they have
              > hatched. Let's focus on this week and see what happens and adjust
              > accordingly.
              > Who is in town and able to attend for...
              > GAMES:
              > ***************************************
              > Wednesday Night, 18:30 to ~21:00
              > My house in San Ramon
              > (Contact me off-list if you need directions)
              > ***************************************
              > - Rich
              >
            • David Wallace
              I m planning to come tonight - not sure about Kern yet. Dave W.
              Message 6 of 10 , Dec 28, 2011
              • 0 Attachment
                I'm planning to come tonight - not sure about Kern yet.

                Dave W.

                On 12/25/2011 9:46 PM, Richard Pardoe wrote:
                > LAST WEEK:
                > We welcomed Nick and Stephanie who stopped lurking and decided to join for
                > games. With seven players and wanting to have everyone involved, it seemed
                > only natural to bring out 7 WONDERS. We played a first game with the
                > A-Sides of the Wonders then repeated the game with the B-Sides. In the
                > first game, Nick was an economic engine garnering gold hand over first. But
                > Nick didn't forget to balance his objectives building a chain of civil
                > (blue) buildings for VPs as well as capitalizing on some nice guilds:
                > (Scores are per the provided scorepad: military (red) + money + wonder +
                > civil (blue) + trade (yellow) + guilds (purple) + science (green))
                > Nick: -5 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 5 + 12 + 0 = 49
                > Lawr: 9 + 5 + 10 + 13 + 3 + 0 + 4 = 44
                > Steph: 9 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 18 = 43
                > Ben: 3 + 0 + 15 + 17 + 0 + 0 + 8 = 43
                > Tim: 3 + 4 + 3 + 18 + 8 + 6 + 0 = 42
                > Dave: 5 + 3 + 10 + 11 + 0 + 9 + 0 = 38
                > Rich: 0 + 1 + 10 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 13 = 36
                > In our second game, Rich (with the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus) aimed to
                > build his wonder on the last card of each age to lay claim to the discards
                > for his free build. This allowed him to get a complete science set in the
                > first Age which then lead to several natural builds in the later ages. But
                > would a push in science (3 sets of 3) be enough against a more balanced
                > build? Nope, Stephanie nicely balances for the win:
                > Steph: 13 + 7 + 7 + 14 + 7 + 15 + 0 = 63
                > Rich: -2 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 0 + 0 + 48 = 58
                > Nick: -6 + 10 + 10 + 23 + 4 + 15 + 0 = 56
                > Dave: 18 + 6 + 7 + 15 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 54
                > Tim: -5 + 4 + 3 + 14 + 2 + 5 + 25= 48
                > Ben: 11 + 2 + 13 + 3 + 3 + 6 + 2 = 40
                > Lawr: 9 + 1 + 5 + 9 + 2 + 11 + 1 = 38
                > I hope Nick and Stephanie enjoyed our game(s) and consider coming back
                > again. Our (pseudo) tradition of newcomer's winning seems to have worked
                > its magic again.
                > THIS WEEK:
                > It is the quiet week between holidays, so don't know who is in town and
                > available for games. Looking back at the past few weeks attendance, we
                > appear to have made a step jump up in attendance having more than 5 around
                > the table more often than not. As there are more games that can be enjoyed
                > with 3 or 4 players, I think the group needs to consider splitting up for a
                > couple of games if the attendance remains high. Normally, I have been
                > explaining the games, but if we do split up, I will be looking for
                > volunteers to help with the second game's introduction. But perhaps this is
                > all putting the cart before the horse or counting chickens before they have
                > hatched. Let's focus on this week and see what happens and adjust
                > accordingly.
                > Who is in town and able to attend for...
                > GAMES:
                > ***************************************
                > Wednesday Night, 18:30 to ~21:00
                > My house in San Ramon
                > (Contact me off-list if you need directions)
                > ***************************************
                > - Rich
                >
                >
              • Richard Pardoe
                Looks like tonight s player count is 6 or 7 around the table. I think we should split into two games, so am looking for a rules explainer/game host for the
                Message 7 of 10 , Dec 28, 2011
                • 0 Attachment
                  Looks like tonight's player count is 6 or 7 around the table. I think we
                  should split into two games, so am looking for a rules explainer/game host
                  for the game I am not involved in.

                  The games I was considering for tonight were Elder Sign (or) Norenberc and I
                  am prepared to explain the rules to either. While Elder Sign does list up
                  to 8P, I think (having read the rules) it is probably better at 3 or 4P
                  especially to start.

                  Open to suggestions for the second game so I can see if I can get the other
                  game ready for tonight also. Or perhaps it might make more sense to your
                  personal copy of a game you want to try if you are interested in getting it
                  played tonight.

                  - Rich
                • Richard Pardoe
                  And that will make 8 which is the limit of how many I can host! If anyone else who hasn t responded in the clear affirmative is thinking of attending, I must
                  Message 8 of 10 , Dec 28, 2011
                  • 0 Attachment

                    And that will make 8 which is the limit of how many I can host!  If anyone else who hasn’t responded in the clear affirmative is thinking of attending, I must limit attendance to those who have responded.

                     

                    Dave W – I hope you can read this in time to understand that we won’t have room for Kern tonight.  My table can only hold 8 players and split into two 4P games tonight.

                     

                    -          Rich

                     

                    From: Nikotime1@... [mailto:Nikotime1@...]
                    Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 5:08 PM
                    To: RPardoe@...
                    Subject: RE: [trivalleygamers] Invitation to Games - 28 Dec

                     

                    Rich,

                     

                    I keep forgetting this email address is not subscribed to the group. I emailed this to the group yesterday, but it got bounced back because Stephanie is subscribed but I am not:

                     

                    Rich and the group:

                     

                    We will make a repeat appearance and test that theory about beginners luck :-)

                     

                    See you then,

                     

                    Nick & Stephanie

                    510-886-5222

                     

                    p.s. Rich please email us your address again.

                  • David Wallace
                    No problem - it will be just me. If you are still looking for game ideas, I d be up for a game of Puerto Rico, and would be happy to explain it. (I d also be
                    Message 9 of 10 , Dec 28, 2011
                    • 0 Attachment
                      No problem - it will be just me. If you are still looking for game
                      ideas, I'd be up for a game of Puerto Rico, and would be happy to
                      explain it. (I'd also be happy with new games, as well). I could bring
                      my copy, but I think you have one, right?

                      Dave W.

                      On 12/28/2011 5:12 PM, Richard Pardoe wrote:
                      > And that will make 8 which is the limit of how many I can host! If anyone
                      > else who hasn't responded in the clear affirmative is thinking of attending,
                      > I must limit attendance to those who have responded.
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > Dave W - I hope you can read this in time to understand that we won't have
                      > room for Kern tonight. My table can only hold 8 players and split into two
                      > 4P games tonight.
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > - Rich
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > From: Nikotime1@... [mailto:Nikotime1@...]
                      > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 5:08 PM
                      > To: RPardoe@...
                      > Subject: RE: [trivalleygamers] Invitation to Games - 28 Dec
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > Rich,
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > I keep forgetting this email address is not subscribed to the group. I
                      > emailed this to the group yesterday, but it got bounced back because
                      > Stephanie is subscribed but I am not:
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > Rich and the group:
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > We will make a repeat appearance and test that theory about beginners luck
                      > :-)
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > See you then,
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > Nick& Stephanie
                      >
                      > 510-886-5222
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > p.s. Rich please email us your address again.
                      >
                      >
                    • Richard Pardoe
                      Yes, I do have a copy of Puerto Rico and it is on the game table waiting for those who are interested in that game. - Rich ... From:
                      Message 10 of 10 , Dec 28, 2011
                      • 0 Attachment
                        Yes, I do have a copy of Puerto Rico and it is on the game table waiting for
                        those who are interested in that game.

                        - Rich

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: trivalleygamers@yahoogroups.com
                        [mailto:trivalleygamers@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Wallace
                        Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 5:24 PM
                        To: trivalleygamers@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [trivalleygamers] Invitation to Games - 28 Dec

                        No problem - it will be just me. If you are still looking for game
                        ideas, I'd be up for a game of Puerto Rico, and would be happy to
                        explain it. (I'd also be happy with new games, as well). I could bring
                        my copy, but I think you have one, right?

                        Dave W.
                      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.