Re: [tracker2] Paclink REVISITED ......OOOOOPS!
- This was for battery vs. AC? What were the results?
> I restarted my Igate at 15.45 and the difference in packet traffic and
> station count speaks volumes!
> Quiet literally!
> I wish you could figure this out Scott...in the mean time all my
> investments are going to the pop tart company! <G>
> Steve, kf6wax
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
> <ldeffenb@... <mailto:ldeffenb@...>> wrote:
> Interesting thought! If all goes well, my Alinco/T2-135/nuvi will
> be in my car tonight running on a separate 12v lead acid battery.
> It would be trivial to compare it's IGate performance on that
> battery vs my line-powered 12v supply later tonight.
> I need to pull the Alinco in to reconfigure the T2 for nuvi
> operation anyway, now I have TWO reasons to do so!
> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ
> Scott Miller wrote:
>> Yeah, what I'm wondering is if there's some low frequency component
>> present sometimes (like 60 hz line noise) that's causing a
>> problem. I'm
>> going to go check over my SPICE models again and do some experiments.
>> Steve wrote:
>> > The problem I am having with that theory Scott is that the stock
>> tnc in the
>> > Alinco works outstandingly untill the buffers fill up......or at
>> least thats
>> > the problem that i think the alinco tnc has.
>> > Too much traffic and it locks up in the Igate....also the same
>> problem with
>> > the tnc in the KenWood D700A, A close cousin to the tnc in the
>> Alinco but
>> > cant handle too much traffic either?
>> > You can view my I gate right now,KF6WAX-1 is still running the
>> T2-135 in the
>> > Alinco 135 the traffic count is awful! just 18 in 10 minutes,
>> and just 7
>> > stations regarded as local, normally mid-day would be between 45
>> and 55
>> > stations regarded as local,
>> > Cheers
>> > Steve, kf6wax
>> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Scott Miller
>> <scott@... <mailto:scott%40opentrac.org>
>> > <mailto:scott% <mailto:scott%25>40opentrac.org
>> <http://40opentrac.org/>>> wrote:
>> > > What gets me is that the T2-135's are so inconsistent. The
>> > > process and parts are the same as for the OT2m, and the OT2m
>> > > have that kind of performance variation. I'm really starting
>> to wonder
>> > > if there's not some inconsistency in the DR-135's themselves
>> that the
>> > > T2-135 doesn't deal with well.
>> > >
>> > > I'll have to do some experiments as time allows. Maybe I'll
>> have to
>> > > borrow one of the problem radios for more testing, to see if
>> it's doing
>> > > something the two I have here aren't.
>> > >
>> > > Scott
>> > >