Re: [tracker2] OT2m or ??? Was: Scripting problem
- The OT2m is a bargain, with many neat and nifty features.
From: Scott Miller
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [tracker2] OT2m or ??? Was: Scripting problem
Not sure if it'll be ready in time for Dayton, but we'll see. The
hardware will be an upgrade, but the main intent is making them easier
to produce and eliminating hard-to-get parts.
On 4/3/2011 2:18 PM, Bob Burns W9RXR wrote:
> At 10:22 PM 3/30/2011, Scott Miller wrote:
> >I think we're down to about 30 OT2m in stock now. MX614DWs are still
> >delayed. We might have to do another run of the current board, but
> >I'm trying to avoid it. I'd rather push ahead with the new design,
> >if I can get it done in time.
> Scott, you're a tease. <grin>
> I was thinking about buying an OT2m for my digi, but you keep hinting
> that you are reaching the end of the road with the current OT2 and
> mentioning a "new design". Makes me wonder if I should wait until
> Dayton to see what you roll out.
> Decisions, decisions.
Yahoo! Groups Links
- At 05:56 PM 4/4/2011, Rudy Benner wrote:
>The OT2m is a bargain, with many neat and nifty features.Rudy, I already own two T2-135's and two T2-301's. I'm well familiar
with the "neat and nifty features" of the T2 series. My W9RXR-1 digi
is currently running a T2-135, but I want to upgrade it to a
commercial grade radio, hence my interest in an OT2m. I also maintain
another high-profile digi that's currently using a Kantronics KPC-3+
which we may upgrade.