Re: LT of APOT2a
- Yes, I see the logic in that. Scott's comment that the firmware is a
pre-release candidate makes sense too.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Jason Winningham <jdw@...> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2006, at 4:14 PM, David wrote:
> > Hi, when I look at the packet data, I see my OT2protoC is announcing
> > itself with a LT of APOT2A; I would assume it should be APOT2C.
> think software version, not hardware version.