8442Re: [tracker2] Development build > decoding
- Sep 2, 2009I made some tweaks to the clock recovery code, so yes, the RX
performance should be at least a little better.
Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote:
> I'm not sure how the latest build would have improved reception, but if
> anyone else is as curious as I was, I've generated coverage maps for
> KC5EVE for his travels on the 29th and 30th. You can see them at:
> There are a few holes along the route, but when it had coverage, it had
> nice coverage!
> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - APRS Infrastructure Visualization
> Mark Cheavens wrote:
> > On one of my "to do" lists has been to update the firmware in my
> > T2-135 to the "latest development build" (June 09) for a while.
> > I finally got around to it AFTER a long trip (4k miles). The trip was
> > frustrating at how FEW packets got decoded. (displayed on the Nuvi)
> > From my initial testing last night and this morning, all I can say
> > is WOW!!!! What an improvement! My normal drive before would result
> > in about 10% of the packets being decode and displayed, Now it
> > appears to be near 100%.
> > (Now if we can just get timestamp of when the packet arrived into the
> > Nuvi............)
> > As usual, great work Scott!
> > Mark
> > KC5EVE
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>