Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

8442Re: [tracker2] Development build > decoding

Expand Messages
  • Scott Miller
    Sep 2, 2009
      I made some tweaks to the clock recovery code, so yes, the RX
      performance should be at least a little better.

      Scott

      Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote:
      >
      >
      > I'm not sure how the latest build would have improved reception, but if
      > anyone else is as curious as I was, I've generated coverage maps for
      > KC5EVE for his travels on the 29th and 30th. You can see them at:
      >
      > http://ldeffenb.dnsalias.net.nyud.net/Tracking/Requests/KC5EVE*
      > <http://ldeffenb.dnsalias.net.nyud.net/Tracking/Requests/KC5EVE*>
      >
      > There are a few holes along the route, but when it had coverage, it had
      > nice coverage!
      >
      > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - APRS Infrastructure Visualization
      >
      > Mark Cheavens wrote:
      > > On one of my "to do" lists has been to update the firmware in my
      > > T2-135 to the "latest development build" (June 09) for a while.
      > >
      > > I finally got around to it AFTER a long trip (4k miles). The trip was
      > > frustrating at how FEW packets got decoded. (displayed on the Nuvi)
      > >
      > > From my initial testing last night and this morning, all I can say
      > > is WOW!!!! What an improvement! My normal drive before would result
      > > in about 10% of the packets being decode and displayed, Now it
      > > appears to be near 100%.
      > >
      > > (Now if we can just get timestamp of when the packet arrived into the
      > > Nuvi............)
      > >
      > > As usual, great work Scott!
      > >
      > > Mark
      > > KC5EVE
      > >
      >
      >
    • Show all 19 messages in this topic