13717Re: [tracker2] Digi Question
- Mar 13, 2012Completing the off-topic thread here, why not put the frequency as the
object name so that it shows up for the human in the readable station
list AND put the FFF.FFFMHz or FFF.FF MHz (or whatever case is correct)
in the comment for use by the TUNE/QSY function?
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Decloaking for comments...
On 3/13/2012 9:49 AM, Keith VE7GDH wrote:
> James VE6SRV wrote...
>> Case sensitivity is part of the specification. There are other
>> things in APRS that are case sensitive, so does that make them
>> broken as well? There are details that are conveyed due to the
>> case of specific characters in the specification.
> If you agree that MHz is case sensitive in the frequency for a
> repeater object, would you also consider the usage of beaconing a
> repeater object is incorrect if it is just plain missing the MHz?
> That is my point. If you beacon a repeater object where the only
> place the frequency is shown is in the name of the object, it is
> unusable for users of current crop of tune/QSY radios, namely the
> TH-D72A/E, TM-D710A/E and the FTM-350AR. Yes, a human
> can look at the frequency and (laboriously) dial in the frequency,
> offset and tone but why go out of your way to remove some
> extremely useful functionality in this new crop of radios?
>> It's incorrect to consider a packet format incorrect just
>> because of a problem with the implementation of the decoding
>> of that specification in a specific piece of hardware as well.
>> Modifying the specification to work around limitations in a
>> hardware implementation does not make the specification wrong.
> The specification itself is a moving target, and a number of times
> changes have been recommended by Bob himself to fine tune it
> to match Kenwood's implementation of his recommendations to
> them. The new radios require a particular format to be able to
> use the tune/QSY button. I'm not going to intentionally do
> something to prevent them from being used to the fullest extent.
> The format shown on the following page agrees with you...
> and the following page gets it right (mostly except for the
> example of D256 which doesn't exist and a few other odds'n'ends)
> and is compatible with the D72, D710 and FTM-350AR. That
> is the route I will take. I didn't invent it. I just borrowed a
> D72 and found what works and what doesn't. The "frequency
> spec" page emphasizes FFF.FFFMHz or FFF.FF MHz but
> does also show the frequency for the object name... but you
> can't put MHz there to make it tuneable. Perhaps a compromise
> would be to have the frequency in the object name to keep
> you happy (and those that don't have a D72 etc.) and to also
> have a tuneable frequency in the beacon comment. I would still
> prefer to see the callsign but would fight more for a tuneable
> frequency in the comment rather than leaving it out to spite
> owners of the "new" tune/QSY capable radios.
> Anyway, enough of this. I'll type up a note for the APRS SIG
> when I get a chance.
> 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>