13701Re: [tracker2] Digi Question
- Mar 11 2:23 PMOn Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Keith VE7GDH <ve7gdh@...> wrote:
> > C'mon Keith... you're being nasty now...Sure you are... just like I am!
> No, I'm not being nasty.
> I'm making an observation about a pathYeah, but that wasn't asked for. You know how it happens... getting
> being used by a digipeater.
labeled as mean and nasty, trying to dictate to others how they should
run their equipment. (BTW, I am playing a bit of the Devil's advocate
here as I fully agree with Keith's statements up until now)
> > WD5MHZ>APU25N,GAYLOR*,K5CS-12*,WIDE3-1,qAR,KA5MGLYou're swimming upstream here! When you see an object with a frequency
> :;442.425-R*030027z3458.72N/09419.35Wm442.425 +
> I completely missed that it was a repeater object, but had I
> noticed it, I would have been nasty about that one too. 8-)
> I don't have a D72, but I have had the use of a club-owned one for
> the last week and a half. Having had a chance to play around with
> it, I would actually disagree with the "voice repeater spec". I
> believe it is wrong to use the frequency for the name of the
> object. I would instead use the callsign of the repeater followed
> by -R to indicate at a glance at the station list that it's a
in it, it is immediately recognizable as repeater object. There aren't
many assigned callsigns that are all numbers.
> Going on and using the "tune" button, it is imperativeYou've been hitting the beer early today! KA5MGL is another station
> that the frequency is followed by MHz... e.g. 442.425MHz (case
> sensitive) followed by T136 for the tone and + for the offset, so
> my recommendation would be KA5MGL-R for the name of the
entirely. It was an i-gate about 180 km east of the repeater that
gated the packet to the internet. You're also mixing up repeater
objects and QSY information that I am seeing a lot of people doing.
The guys in Calgary are getting their voice repeater objects all
screwed up by trying to put QSY information into the repeater objects.
They are different beasts. Close cousins, but still different.
> I've played with repeater objects generated by a KPC3+,You're going to have to fight the masses then. I like the frequency in
> beacons from UI-View, from a script running on an IRLP node
> (local club meeting announcements) and an APRS IRLP status
> object, and my conclusion was the same in every case. I felt it
> was actually better to have the callsign for the object name
> instead of the frequency, or of course in the case of an IRLP
> node, IRLP-xxxx with the node number highly visible in the
> station list.
the object name where it is highly visible, and very unlikely to be
mistaken for anything else. If you were local here in Edmonton, and I
told you to meet me on the VE6HM repeater, the first question out of
your mouth would be "What's the frequency?". Why go that extra step?
Why not just say "Hey Keith, meet me on 444.100 MHz.". There's no
mistaking that I want to meet up with you on the UHF side of that
repeater, not the VHF side (which uses the same callsign).
The frequency is the key component of getting communicating. The
callsign is irrelevant, it is only required for government
identification purposes. You could jump back one more step... why not
use the location name for the object? EDMNTN-1 would work (since we're
using EDMNTN as the digipeater alias). But then which Edmonton
repeater are you talking about? That adds even more ambiguity to the
mix as there are a dozen or so repeaters to choose from.
> Yes, I should be saying this over on the APRS SIG, but thereIndeed, but this isn't really the forum for hashing out proposed
> are lots of T2s out there being used for digipeaters, so this
> should be useful information for those adding repeater objects.
changes to an established protocol. We should limit the information to
how to get things implemented in the OpenTracker line in accordance
with the currently established protocols.
On the script examples page in the wiki there's an attempt at sending
a repeater object with what is purported to be a 12 minute interval.
It in fact sends the object after 10 minutes in a 22 minute repetitive
The biggest problem with the ease of disseminating information on the
internet is that very few people attempt to ensure that the
information being delivered is actually correct.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>