Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Atlanta Journal-Constitution - Theodore Roosevelt compared to Obama & McCain

Expand Messages
  • Keith Simon
    Thanks to Harry Lembeck for this article which appeared into today s Atlanta Journal-Constitution [ajc.com] McCain s idol Roosevelt
    Message 1 of 2 , Nov 4, 2008

      Thanks to Harry Lembeck for this article which appeared into today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution

      ajc.com 

      McCain's idol Roosevelt sounded more like Obama

      By Jonathan Zimmerman

      From News Services

      Friday, October 31, 2008

      Here's a simple way to understand the descent of modern Republicanism: the party of Teddy the Rough Rider has become the party of Joe the Plumber.

      Teddy the Rough Rider was Theodore Roosevelt, the GOP president who championed a strong central government and —- surprise! —- taxes on the rich. For many years, Sen. John McCain has identified Roosevelt as his political hero and role model.

      But McCain made no mention of Roosevelt during his final debate against Sen. Barack Obama. He focused instead upon Joe Wurzelbacher, the Ohio plumber who confronted Obama during a campaign stop earlier this month.

      You already know the story. Wurzelbacher said he was looking to buy his own business, and he wondered whether his taxes would go up under Obama's economic plan. In response, Obama acknowledged that some people would see a tax increase. "When you spread the wealth around," Obama told Joe, "it's good for everybody."

      In a subsequent interview, Wurzelbacher described this philosophy as "socialist." McCain himself didn't use that term during the debate, but he made it clear —- in eight separate allusions to "Joe the Plumber" —- that he supported Wurzelbacher's cause.

      "We're going to take Joe's money, give it to Sen. Obama, and let him spread the wealth around," McCain complained. "I want Joe the Plumber to spread his wealth around."

      Let's leave aside the question of whether Wurzelbacher —- who already owes over $1,000 in back taxes —- would actually pay more under Obama's plan. He probably wouldn't. The larger point here is that the Republicans have a new hero, and it's not Teddy Roosevelt.

      There's a good reason for that. Roosevelt understood that his signature federal reforms —- the Food and Drug Act, the Meat Inspection Act and so on —- created new costs. And he thought wealthy Americans should pick up a bigger fraction of the bill. "The man of great wealth owes a peculiar obligation to the State, because he derives special advantages from the mere existence of government," Roosevelt declared in 1907. "Not only should he recognize this obligation in the way he leads his daily life and in the way he earns and spends his money, but it should also be recognized by the way in which he pays for the protection the State gives him."

      That's why Roosevelt supported a graduated inheritance tax as well as the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which allowed the federal government to collect personal income taxes. But let's be clear: Roosevelt was no socialist. Indeed, progressive taxation was often put forth as an alternative to socialism. In a time of growing economic inequality and labor unrest, supporters said, only a tax on the rich would stave off revolution.

      And McCain wasn't a socialist, either, when he advocated progressive taxation back in 2000. "I don't think Bill Gates needs a tax cut. I think you and your parents do," McCain said, during his battle with George W. Bush for the Republican presidential nomination. Mocking Bush's calls for across-the-board tax relief, McCain underlined just who would be relieved: the rich. "We give the millionaire a $2,000 refund," McCain explained. "Governor Bush gives him $50,000."

      Fast-forward to this year's campaign, and we find a very new McCain. Rather than rejecting Bush's tax cuts, like Roosevelt would, McCain wants to make them permanent. Even more, McCain and his backers now deride anyone who disagrees with them as a "tax-and-spend liberal," or, yes, as a socialist.

      At a rally earlier this month in Wisconsin, one McCain supporter condemned Obama and House speaker Nancy Pelosi as "hooligans." He went on to grumble that "socialists are taking over our country." McCain nodded appreciatively, and later said that the speaker was right.

      He isn't. Teddy the Rough Rider knew that, a century ago, insisting that well-to-do Americans should pay more than the rest of us. And John McCain knew it, too, until he rode roughshod over Roosevelt's memory. If you demand progressive taxation in 1907, you get your face carved onto Mount Rushmore. But if you advocate the same thing in 2008, you're an enemy of hard-working plumbers. Go figure.

      > Jonathan Zimmerman teaches history and education at New York University. He is the author of "Innocents Abroad: American Teachers in the American Century."

       

    • Harry Lembeck
      I did not send any e-mail with the Atlanta newspaper article. Someone somehow did it with my name, but it was not me. ... I did not send any e-mail with the
      Message 2 of 2 , Nov 4, 2008
        I did not send any e-mail with the Atlanta newspaper article.  Someone somehow did it with my name, but it was not me.
        On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Keith Simon wrote:


        Thanks to Harry Lembeck for this article which appeared into today's Atlanta Journal-Constitutio n

        ajc.com 

        McCain's idol Roosevelt sounded more like Obama

        By Jonathan Zimmerman

        From News Services

        Friday, October 31, 2008

        Here's a simple way to understand the descent of modern Republicanism: the party of Teddy the Rough Rider has become the party of Joe the Plumber.

        Teddy the Rough Rider was Theodore Roosevelt, the GOP president who championed a strong central government and —- surprise! —- taxes on the rich. For many years, Sen. John McCain has identified Roosevelt as his political hero and role model.

        But McCain made no mention of Roosevelt during his final debate against Sen. Barack Obama. He focused instead upon Joe Wurzelbacher, the Ohio plumber who confronted Obama during a campaign stop earlier this month.

        You already know the story. Wurzelbacher said he was looking to buy his own business, and he wondered whether his taxes would go up under Obama's economic plan. In response, Obama acknowledged that some people would see a tax increase. "When you spread the wealth around," Obama told Joe, "it's good for everybody."

        In a subsequent interview, Wurzelbacher described this philosophy as "socialist." McCain himself didn't use that term during the debate, but he made it clear —- in eight separate allusions to "Joe the Plumber" —- that he supported Wurzelbacher' s cause.

        "We're going to take Joe's money, give it to Sen. Obama, and let him spread the wealth around," McCain complained. "I want Joe the Plumber to spread his wealth around."

        Let's leave aside the question of whether Wurzelbacher —- who already owes over $1,000 in back taxes —- would actually pay more under Obama's plan. He probably wouldn't. The larger point here is that the Republicans have a new hero, and it's not Teddy Roosevelt.

        There's a good reason for that. Roosevelt understood that his signature federal reforms —- the Food and Drug Act, the Meat Inspection Act and so on —- created new costs. And he thought wealthy Americans should pick up a bigger fraction of the bill. "The man of great wealth owes a peculiar obligation to the State, because he derives special advantages from the mere existence of government," Roosevelt declared in 1907. "Not only should he recognize this obligation in the way he leads his daily life and in the way he earns and spends his money, but it should also be recognized by the way in which he pays for the protection the State gives him."

        That's why Roosevelt supported a graduated inheritance tax as well as the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which allowed the federal government to collect personal income taxes. But let's be clear: Roosevelt was no socialist. Indeed, progressive taxation was often put forth as an alternative to socialism. In a time of growing economic inequality and labor unrest, supporters said, only a tax on the rich would stave off revolution.

        And McCain wasn't a socialist, either, when he advocated progressive taxation back in 2000. "I don't think Bill Gates needs a tax cut. I think you and your parents do," McCain said, during his battle with George W. Bush for the Republican presidential nomination. Mocking Bush's calls for across-the-board tax relief, McCain underlined just who would be relieved: the rich. "We give the millionaire a $2,000 refund," McCain explained. "Governor Bush gives him $50,000."

        Fast-forward to this year's campaign, and we find a very new McCain. Rather than rejecting Bush's tax cuts, like Roosevelt would, McCain wants to make them permanent. Even more, McCain and his backers now deride anyone who disagrees with them as a "tax-and-spend liberal," or, yes, as a socialist.

        At a rally earlier this month in Wisconsin, one McCain supporter condemned Obama and House speaker Nancy Pelosi as "hooligans." He went on to grumble that "socialists are taking over our country." McCain nodded appreciatively, and later said that the speaker was right.

        He isn't. Teddy the Rough Rider knew that, a century ago, insisting that well-to-do Americans should pay more than the rest of us. And John McCain knew it, too, until he rode roughshod over Roosevelt's memory. If you demand progressive taxation in 1907, you get your face carved onto Mount Rushmore. But if you advocate the same thing in 2008, you're an enemy of hard-working plumbers. Go figure.

        > Jonathan Zimmerman teaches history and education at New York University. He is the author of "Innocents Abroad: American Teachers in the American Century."

         


      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.