TMB Field Flattener for TMB 175 - Need help
- Hi all
I am wondering if anyone has a Field Flattener for the TMB 175 and
are using it successfully with their imaging system.
I have been having a bear of a time trying to get mine to dial in on
my new Finger Lakes Proline 16803 camera and have not been successful.
Curvature is over 36% as analyzed with CCDInspector which is so far
off from what people like Tim Povlick is getting that I am now
becoming somewhat frantic to get my scope back in service, (has been
almost 5 months since I last imaged).
Part of my problem was selling my old camera last September as the
Proline was to be available the first or second week of October. It
was finally delivered in February and I finally got to test the new
field flattener that Markus built for me. We had to get the spacer re-
done as the original was too short but now, it looks like I am at the
exact distance to the CCD chip of 113mm.
I have put together a short html that compares my FF to Tim's that he
uses on both his TMB 152mm and 228mm scopes.
To see some inital shots and the schematic of the imaging system,
To see the differences between Tim's and my FF, click here.
Any advice would be grealy appreciated. I am at the end of my stick
on this latest challenge.
- Same for me Tim -- can you place the CCD Inspector results in the Photo section on the TMB Group -- Thanks.
Teuwen Karel <publik@...> wrote:
Hi Tim and Mike,
Thanks for your answers gentlemen. Tim, I'm very curious to see the result
of your imaging combo in CCD Inspector, can you post it here or send it to
me privately ?
Van: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Namens
Verzonden: dinsdag 12 juni 2007 10:07
Onderwerp: [tmboptical] Re: Solved!!! We hope. TMB Field Flattener for TMB
>--- In tmboptical@yahoogro <mailto:tmboptical%40yahoogroups.com> ups.com,Michael Sherick
> <michaelsherick@...> wrote:Karel / Mike,
Sorry you guys are having this much problem with the 152FF. At 20%
I think other problems are at hand rather than spacing; unless the
spacing is way off. I don't have my 152FF CCD Inspector numbers
but they are in the CCD Inspector gallery on the ccdware website
(support / CCD I). I recall it did was a very good FF.
The FF I use had front lens of 94mm and rear element of 88mm (??).
Is this the same as yours?
Mike - what focuser do you have on the 152?
Still looking for Markus around the city....
> Hello Karel,TMB "Field Flattener" that I have been trying to use with my TMB152,
> I'm sorry to report that I'm in the same situation with my
with a STL6303. I have had nothing but difficulty getting a flat
field with this very expensive chunck of glass. I'm going to have
another housing made to try a new lens to CCD spacing distance --
this time 113mm according to Markus. I hope this works -- anyone
want to buy an expensive paper weight?
> Teuwen Karel <publik@...> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> With my TMB152 and the SBig STL11000 I also use the new designed
> TMB. I use a direct connection (not the nose piece) to connectboth and
> respected the right distance from the rear lens to the detector.Let's say
> that I'm not completely satisfied about it. I still have deformedstars on
> the edges and CCD Inspector tells me I have still a curvature ofmore than
> 20%. It wasn't a cheap piece of equipment and honestly I wasexpecting more
> of it. Who among you guys have the same impression about this ?[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Karel Teuwen
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]