Public Office is a trust!
Pursuant to § 22-32-109(1)(y), 9 C.R.S. (1988), the board adopted a formal conflict of interest
policy in 1984. The policy states: Public office is a trust created in the interest of the common
good and for benefit of the people. A conflict of interest can arise when a public officer is unable
to devote himself with complete loyalty and singleness of purpose to the general public interest. It
is the intent of this policy to protect the public trust placed in directors of this school district. For
purposes of this policy, the Board declares that conflicts of interest can arise when a Board
member will personally derive a significant private benefit that is pecuniary in nature from Board
action. In the event of any conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest, the Board member
shall disclose the conflict of interest in writing to the Board prior to the vote. The written
disclosure will be attached to the minutes of the meeting at which Board action occurred relating
to the matter disclosed. The Board will not purchase supplies, equipment or personal services in
excess of $500.00 from any member of the Board or from a firm or corporation in which a
Board member has a substantial interest unless such purchases are made on the basis of
competitive bids or quotations requested through public advertising. Members may submit bids
when formal bids are requested but should abstain from voting to award contracts under such
bids. A Board member who discloses a potential conflict of interest on any matter may abstain
from voting on the matter disclosed. Although the policy does not expressly prohibit board
members from being employed as teachers within the district, the board maintains, and the record
does not indicate otherwise, that it has consistently interpreted the policy to preclude persons
from holding such dual positions. Lambert does not challenge the policy on the basis that it failed
to provide her with adequate notice of the types of activities that would constitute a conflict of
interest. Montrose County School District Re-1j and Board of Education for Montrose County School District Re-1j v. Lambert, 826 P.2d 349 (Colo. 02/24/1992)
PHONE #s: 970-330-3883/720-203-5142 c.
For mailing: Excellence Unlimited, 2830 27th St. Ln. #B115, Greeley , CO 80634
BEAR'S WEB PAGES:
- GARDNER v. BRODERICK, 392 U.S. 273 (1968)
Appellant, a police officer, was subpoenaed by and appeared before a grand
jury which was investigating alleged bribery and corruption of police
officers, and was advised that the grand jury proposed to examine him
concerning the performance of his official duties.
at 279 ---------------------------
and not solely for the purpose of securing an accounting of his performance
of his public trust. If the latter had been the only purpose, there would
have been no reason to seek to compel petitioner to waive his immunity.
When you contact a public servant to have them account for the
performance of their official duties, they have no immunity
NOT TO ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They MUST account for the performance of their duties
while under the color of their office.
At 03:56 PM 9/26/05 -0600, you wrote:
>Pursuant to § 22-32-109(1)(y), 9 C.R.S. (1988), the board adopted a formal
>conflict of interest
>policy in 1984. The policy states: Public office is a trust created in the
>interest of the common