Futile acts-important rights
The law does not require parties to perform futile acts as a condition precedent to asserting
important rights. See Bell v. Arnold, 175 Colo. 277, 487 P.2d 545 (1971).
PHONE #s: 970-330-3883/720-203-5142 c.
For mailing: Excellence Unlimited, 2830 27th St. Ln. #B115, Greeley , CO 80634
BEAR'S WEB PAGES:
- Otherwise...You do not have to wait to inform people that
unconstitutoinal acts such as frn's...income-tax and imunity for
judges. Make a claim now that freedom is a choice and equal protection
of the law is equal to everyone.
No special privliages here. Everyone gets the same treatment. Kinda
like my project yesterday. I told others that if you are not doing
what you want as a means of survival. then you are a slave. No
buts...No well... No s---! I believe I may have sturred a brain cell
The end only comes when you give up.
Be a leader and lead with pride.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Legalbear" <bear@f...> wrote:
> The law does not require parties to perform futile acts as a
> precedent to asserting
> important rights. See Bell v. Arnold, 175 Colo. 277, 487 P.2d 545