How to 'circumvent' 28 USC 2201(a)?
Thank you. Yes, those are certainly some of the right questions to ask. Question is, how
do get to the point where you may ask those questions? And more importantly, how do
you get into position to ask those questions by going on *offense*? (A much better
position to be in than defense). Declaratory judgments seem to be the way to go, but
since they're "banned" by §2201 (with respect to Federal taxes), one's hands seem to be
Might §2201 be challenged on constitutional grounds? §2201 seems repugnant to the
very foundation of the Republic.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "paradoxmagnus" <paradoxmagnus@e...>
> Maybe you should ask the IRS the right questions, demand a YES or NO
> answer, demand that they identify the ORIGINAL STATUTE that created
- ---You will lose using "code".Petition the court under your 1st amendment protected
right to petition the govt.
> part reads:judgments are
> (a) In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction,
> except with respect to Federal taxes other than actions brought
> under section 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [...]
> any court of
> the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may
> declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested
> party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or
> could be sought. Any such declaration shall have the force and
> effect of a final judgment or decree and shall be reviewable as
> So, it appears as though "frontal assaults" regarding Federal tax declaratory
> not allowed (is that constitutional?), but perhaps another way? How can onedeclare one's
> status and activities as not subject to Federal taxation jurisdiction in light of 28USC
> 2201(a)? Is there another or better way to accomplish the end sought?