THE BASIC PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC
The Basic Principles underlying our Constitutional Republic:These united States of America were founded, and were intended to continue to function, NOT as a Democracy, but as a Representative Republic under a written Constitution based upon very definite classical principles. These principles, at their adoption, were labeled 'extremist' and 'radical' because they diverged dramatically from the way the English government functioned [the people yelling 'extremist' and 'radical' the loudest at that time, were 'governing' and being 'governed' under English military rule].
The Constitution is still the ONLY lawful and legitimate foundation of our Republic. The only article which may ever be legitimately suspended is that portion which states that the writ of Habeas Corpus may be suspended in times of invasion or insurrection.
It is NOT 'old,' 'time-worn,' 'outdated,' 'obsolete,' 'irrelevant,' 'nationalistic,' 'isolationist,' nor any other derogatory characterization.
Nor is it 'flexible', 'living', 'mutable', or interpretable by any court.
The Constitution and all laws and treaties which conform with its requirements are the Law of the Land in this Nation.
It is my (and your) God-given Right as a natural born, or naturalized, American.
Anyone who tells you differently is:
(1) Ignorant [does not know any better, but can learn if he/she will];
(2) Stupid [does not know any better and cannot/won't/doesn't-want-to learn]; or
(3) Deceitful [lying to you or trying to cheat you].
Lacking a firm understanding of the basic principles of this Constitutional Republic by each and every Citizen, we have become ignorant 'subjects', mis-educated and oppressively mis-governed by an un-principle-d 'United States Government'.
If you have not read these documents, here is your chance:
The origin of our Common Law is Magna Carta, The Great Charter won in 1215 A.D. from John, King of England by his own barons because he had abused his people and his authority so badly.
Confirmio Cartarum : (1297)
The English Declaration of Rights: (1689)
Enacted as the English Bill of Rights [1 William & Mary, Sess. 2, Ch. 2 (December, 1689)].
The Constitution did not appear in or from a vacuum.
The principles of Natural Law as expounded by John Locke (c. 1690 A.D.) were a major influence upon the founders of the Constitution.
John Locke's 'Second Treatise on Government':
Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law of England was a significant resource on the Common Law of England and known by most of the Founders.
Emmerich de Vattel's treatise on International Law The Law of Nations (1758):
The written Organic [fundamental] Law of these united States of America:
[Maybe] The Paris Peace Treaty (1783):
Both The Federalist Papers: and The Anti-Federalist Papers: are collections of articles urging or opposing the adoption of the new Constitution. They were intended to be read by the average literate and educated man of the time. The reader was expected to be familiar with and to understand the arguments, the references, the social context, and to agree/disagree strongly. American courts sometimes rely upon the Federalist Papers to determine what the original intent of the Constitution was.
[I suspect the Confederate States of America may have taken the position at their creation that, "This Constitution thing is just not working properly for us; we're going back to The Articles of Confederation." (Hence: Confederate States).]
Congress seriously overstepped itself after the States had adopted the new Constitution.The Laws: The Alien Act of July 6, 1798:
Southerners later relied on the Virginia and the Kentucky Resolutions to justify The Right to Secede from the Union:
The Legal Result: The Supreme Court decision concerning the Sedition Act:
Commentary on Constitutional government:Before You Are Defrauded Of Your Inheritance:
'Conquest' and 'Usurpation'; excerpts from John Locke's
"The Second Treatise on Government":
I used to fear that these united States of America would be destroyed from outside by military force; but these days I believe our Nation have already been subverted from within by the greedy, ambitious, and self-serving attorneys, attorneys-elected-as-politicians, and attorneys-acting-as-judges within our very midst.
These two articles were intended as satire, but are they really?
How do you shame the shame-less?
Do you know an attorney who holds, or thinks he/she holds a 'Letter of Marque' [Commission as a Privateer]?
These articles are not satire:
I believe it is long past time to run ALL the attorneys out of our Constitutional Republic, a la George Orwell's Animal Farm.
The only redeeming part of the coming civil chaos is that it will NOT be an 'Insurrection,' an 'Uprising,' a 'Revolt,' a 'Rebellion,' a 'Revolution,' nor even 'Terrorism'.
It is not an 'Terrorism,' when you fire your miscreant public servants.
It is not a 'Revolution,' when you swat a mosquito, yank up a weed, or kill a threatening rattlesnake.
It is not a 'Rebellion,' when you find your home infested with fleas, termites, or ########### and hire an exterminator.
There is not a 'Uprising,' when you find you have cancer and undergo chemotherapy or surgery.
These are all various forms of self-defense and 'Pest Control'.
The parasite which kills its host dies too!
Important information:Council of State Governments 'Declaration of Interdependence':
Hint: read Volumes 1-3 of The Book of The States.
How our laws keep being 'revised' by un-elected, un-accountable, non-legislators: The National Commission on Uniform Laws:
Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency: (November 19, 1973).
Jim Shaver's information about the illegal IRS "Notice of Lien":
These groups may interest you:Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership:
Legal Resources:The Constitution for The United States, Its Sources and Its Applications:
Read this book! "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary: (1856).
IRS 6209 Manual: (IMF deciphering info)
U.S. Supreme Court holds that there must be "probable cause" hearing within 48 hours of arrest without warrant:
County of Riverside v. McLaughlin (89-1817), 500 U.S. 44 (1991).
United States agrees that firearms ownership IS an individual right.
United States v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001).
Solicitor General's brief in U.S. v. Emerson.
Legal remedy for a county's "willful disregard for the constitutional rights of its citizens":
Henry v. County of Shasta (9th Cir. 1997), 132 F.3d 512, mod. & reh. den. 137 F.3d 1372, cert. den. 525 U.S. 819, 142 L.Ed.2d 46.
In California, and states organized similarly within the 9th Ciricuit, the sheriff is a county, not a state, actor [no "sovereign immunity"; the sheriff and the county are fair game under 42 U.S.C.A. 1983]:
Brewster v. County of Shasta (9th Cir. 2001), 275 F.3d 803.
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals holds in a Habeas Corpus that President has no inherent power in his role as Commander-in Chief to detain American citizens seized on American soil during peacetime without authorization from Congress. The decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court.
Padilla v. Rumsfeld (2nd Cir. 2003).
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.