Re: [tips_and_tricks] IRS loses in court
- I told em at my summons, in my country its illegal
to testify aginst myself as I am inhabitant on the
land in a county within a union state. Not a blank
statement but the type of response to each offending
probe that non of their beeswax. In the case of trusts,
they better not be yours and therefore you've no connection
to those records to have any knowledge about. Bring
some cheap brief case or box of old magazines to
appear as if prepared to reveal, provided they can
ID who they are to even have authority to ask you there.
IRS summons comes with notice that its under a District
CT jurishdiction that its issued or enforeced under,
go read that Ct's jurishdiction and see if you have
entered that in anyway. Be polite just don't get tricked.
> John Wilde wrote:
> Yes the fifth amendment is implicated. However, you're better
> off appearing, once you are served with the summons, and
> invoking the fifth on a question by question basis. If you do
> it then, the likelihood of the IRS requesting that the DOJ bring
- John --
Under normal circumstances, I totally agree with you.
However, I have successfully refuted the IRS summons for dozens of clients
based on several fraudulent errors in the individual's IMF, and not one of
my clients has ever has the IRS pursue them in court. The IRS ONLY issues a
summons to those individuals whose IMF indicates they are a business and NOT
The summons, and all other collections attempts, results from false and
fraudulent entries in the Individual Master File.
Yours in freedom,
From: John Wilde [mailto:jpwilde@...]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [tips_and_tricks] IRS loses in court
Yes the fifth amendment is implicated. However, you're better off
appearing, once you are served with the summons, and invoking the fifth on a
question by question basis. If you do it then, the likelihood of the IRS
requesting that the DOJ bring the enforcement action, or even if requested
by the IRS having the DOJ bringing the enforcement action are significantly
- Can anybody help me on a Title 42 complaint? "Equality at law"