Re: [tips_and_tricks] The term "revenue law"
The statement that all civil lawsuits have been illegal is not true. When people voluntarily sign things they have not read, they get what they deserve. The I.R.S. (Instant Robbery Squad) requires people to place their signature on the 1040 income tax forms under penalty of perjury. What is absolutely astonishing is that people do apply their signature voluntarily to these forms. Knowing full well that they "DID NOT EXAMINE" the form and "accompanying schedules and statements." All the while, not knowing what the logical consequence might be or even how this incriminates them and makes them subject to the income taxes and other governmental rules, regulations, laws & statutes.
Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty Of Perjury!
Angela Stark wrote:
" In the Supreme Court case of U.S. v. Hill, 123 US 681 the Supreme Court said" "The term `revenue law' when used in connection with the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States, means …a law which is "directly traceable" to the power granted to Congress by 8, Art. I of the Constitution, `to lay and collect taxes duties, imposts, and excises.'" Is the income tax as now imposed and collected "directly traceable" to any power granted to Congress by Article 1 of Section 8 of the Constitution? The answer to that is "No" - which means federal courts never had jurisdiction (on this and other grounds) to prosecute anybody in connection with alleged income tax crimes. Which means that all criminal trials over the last 50 years involving income taxes - and also civil lawsuits brought by the government ? HAVE ALL BEEN ILLEGAL! Angela See my new page listing over 70 court decisions re the income tax http://irwinschiff.homestead.com/CasesOnIncome.html
Steadfastly in service to Yahu'shuah :John-Howard: Freeman Ecclesiastes 12:13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear Yhwh, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. Web site: Sovereign Man http://autarchic.tripod.com/