Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [tips_and_tricks] Contracts arising from a parties conduct-watch yourself!

Expand Messages
  • Bill
    This scenario may be better conceptualized and explained as a TRUST (implied or expressed). Alfred Adask has conducted extensive research on this topic and
    Message 1 of 21 , Aug 1, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      This scenario may be better conceptualized and explained as a TRUST (implied or expressed).  Alfred Adask has conducted extensive research on this topic and explains it very well.  His website is
       
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Char
      Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 9:49 PM
      Subject: Re: [tips_and_tricks] Contracts arising from a parties conduct-watch yourself!

      Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but a good example of an 'invisible' contract
      would be if you and your wife go into a restaurant to eat. 
      The owners/manager of the rest. are 'offering' you a meal.  By virtue of your entering
      the restaurant and taking a seat, and letting someone wait on you and bring you food,
      you are agreeing that you will pay for the meal when you leave. 
      "Invisible" but binding.  Just try to leave without paying. (OH!)
      Charlene/Arkansas
       
       

      Can one contract with another, i.e. Rex, who is not amenable to a court of law ?  Reason is the source of this and of law, itself.  Maxim.
      ----- Original Message -----
      On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:30:46 -0500 <jm367@...> writes in part:
      Invisible contracts are collective contracts dreamed up by communists and other collectivists. 
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      I for one, conclude that any material that fails to indicate a SOURCE is personal opinion - unjustifiable to retain - exceedingly dangerous to rely upon - and uncounscionable to repeat!

    • Bill
      CORRECTION -- Alfred Adask s site is as follows: www.antishyster.net (.net and not .com)
      Message 2 of 21 , Aug 1, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
        CORRECTION -- Alfred Adask's site is as follows:

        www.antishyster.net (.net and not .com)
      • jm367@bellsouth.net
        With respect, it s a simple contract actionable by assumpsit. There is nothing in trust for the use of anybody in the restaurant example. ... From: Bill This
        Message 3 of 21 , Aug 1, 2004
        • 0 Attachment
          With respect, it's a simple contract actionable by assumpsit.  There is nothing in trust for the use of anybody in the restaurant example. 
          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Bill

          This scenario may be better conceptualized and explained as a TRUST (implied or expressed). 
        • Bill
          Thanks for the correction. The restaurant scenario is probably not accurately conceptualized as a trust relationship. ... From: jm367@bellsouth.net To:
          Message 4 of 21 , Aug 2, 2004
          • 0 Attachment
            Thanks for the correction.  The restaurant scenario is probably not accurately conceptualized as a trust relationship.
             
            ----- Original Message -----
            From: jm367@...
            Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 10:49 PM
            Subject: Re: [tips_and_tricks] Contracts arising from a parties conduct-watch yourself!

            With respect, it's a simple contract actionable by assumpsit.  There is nothing in trust for the use of anybody in the restaurant example. 
            ----- Original Message -----
            From: Bill

            This scenario may be better conceptualized and explained as a TRUST (implied or expressed). 

          • darlenej
            But I believe the invisible contract Mercier was referring to was invisible when you walk in and still invisible when you walk out, because the terms of the
            Message 5 of 21 , Aug 4, 2004
            • 0 Attachment
              But I believe the invisible contract Mercier was referring to was invisible when you walk in and still invisible when you walk out, because the terms of the contract are NOT known.
              In a restaurant you knowingly, willingly, and intentionally set on a course to be served and pay for that service.
              In the motor vehicle act you are not noticed that your rights will be taken away and that by signing the license you have now invoked POLICE POWER which can TAKE YOU TO JAIL if you do not obey all the confounded rules they are continously making up and changed regularly and often.

              Full disclosure would be in this case that by signing this you give up your rights as a private citizen and the right to use the highways are now a privilege.
              BUT YOU DIDN'T KNOW YOU EVEN HAD THOSE RIGHTS IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THEY SURE AREN'T GOING TO TELL YOU.  Does this not seem just a LITTLE BIT deceitful???
              When you sign the license, do they tell you that you are now under a fourth branch of government known as the APA and that you are to be afforded administrative due process, OR DO THEY BYPASS THEIR OWN RULES AND TAKE YOU RIGHT TO COURT?????
              Do they tell you when you sign the license you are now no longer under the guarantees of your God-given rights which are constitutionally protected, but that you are under a DIFFERENT code of law, which is AGENCY DRIVEN and is a PRIVATE LAW pushed through by PRIVATE organizations to benefit their own agenda;  like monster madd, insurance companies, AND THE NHSTA, which perpetrate lies and propaganda and inflate statistics to keep you regulated so they can steal your rights and rob your pocketbooks???

              IS THIS EVER TOLD YOU ANY ONE OF YOU????
              I think not.
              I believe THIS is what Mercier was talking about in his invisible contracts.
              We have been HOODWINKED.
              And taken to the cleaners by fraud and deceit.
              Darlene

              jm367@... wrote:
              The alleged invisible contracts of Mercier are with Rex.  That's distinguishing.  Secondly, there is an unwritten contract in this example, certainly.  But, it is not invisible to any of the people entering into it on either side.
              ----- Original Message -----
              From: Char

              Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but a good example of an 'invisible' contract
              would be if you and your wife go into a restaurant to eat. 
              The owners/manager of the rest. are 'offering' you a meal.  By virtue of your entering
              the restaurant and taking a seat, and letting someone wait on you and bring you food,
              you are agreeing that you will pay for the meal when you leave. 
              "Invisible" but binding.  Just try to leave without paying. (OH!)
              Charlene/Arkansas

            • jm367@bellsouth.net
              I think you mistook my post. I think the Mercier stuff was probably published as disinfo by spook ops. ... From: darlenej
              Message 6 of 21 , Aug 5, 2004
              • 0 Attachment
                I think you mistook my post.  I think the Mercier stuff was probably published as disinfo by spook ops.
                ----- Original Message -----
                From: darlenej
              Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.