Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Just heard about the new services at JHD & Associates

Expand Messages
  • N. T. Naut
    About the Services Available at John Henry Doe & Associates John Henry Doe & Associates hereby announces the following private contractual document preparation
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 30, 2004
      About the Services Available at

      John Henry Doe & Associates

      John Henry Doe & Associates hereby announces the following private
      contractual document preparation services:

      · Debt Collector-Demand Letter Response

      · Debt Collector-Lawsuit Response

      · Demand-/Request-for-Performance Response

      As you will discover, in case you do not already know it, in today's
      modern society there are not many demands or requests, if any, that
      fall outside the above three categories—including criminal charges.

      The former recent practice of creating and offering specific
      manuals, called Commercial Toolbox Releases, with instructions and
      sample documents for handling particular types of situations, is
      discontinued. John Henry Doe & Associates now offers only private
      contractual document preparation services for handling unwanted

      Based on results, John Henry Doe has apparently mastered the
      Honor/Dishonor philosophy of effectively dealing with demands and
      requests for payment/performance, i.e. presentments—whether verified
      or not—and it is now time for the next edition of Cracking the Code.

      The essence of the services that are now available appears to be
      what many people have been seeking for many years. It is simple in
      form and substance and is not dependent on an attacker's cooperation
      for its effectiveness. Whatever works is valid, however, and the
      workability of this approach does not invalidate any other method
      that produces results. Nobody has a corner on the market, including
      John Henry Doe & Associates—but what we have is working, and it is
      working routinely.

      Whereas the first three editions Cracking the Code were useful in
      their time, the presentment-handling techniques and procedures
      contained therein are dated and no longer recommended, having been
      superseded by recent breakthroughs as described here. Each book,
      however, contains valuable foundational knowledge of "how the world
      goes `round" and should not be discounted. It is just that the
      current presentment-handling techniques far exceed anything else
      achieved before. FYI: Cracking the Code Fourth Edition will contain
      and reveal all aspects of the new breakthroughs.

      Also, as explained elsewhere in this website, the claim of common-
      law trademark is as valid as ever; we just do not need to tack on
      the part about the "copyright of (the common-law trademark)."
      The "copyright of" part is superfluous; all that is needed is to
      claim the common-law trademark.

      Based on the events of the last few months, there have been
      extraordinary demands on JHD's time and energy, and there are still
      matters that require attention and resolution before the CTC4 can be
      commenced. Until that time, the above services nevertheless need to
      be delivered, and are being delivered, despite the need for more
      trained personnel to deliver them in order to accommodate the
      enormous demand that such services presently portend.

      Basic Philosophy behind the New Services

      An ancient maxim of law says, "The principal part of everything is
      the beginning" (Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est.). This
      is a most-senior concept to incorporate into one's consciousness and
      ongoing efforts to survive the contemporary Western banking, legal,
      and taxation industries.

      Even the most calamitous of final outcomes in non-criminal legal
      proceedings begins with but a simple communication, usually in the
      form of a one-page letter; and from that little letter grows the
      voracious ogre that eventually devours the targeted victim's wealth
      and peace of mind and, sometimes, even physical well being.

      There is nothing wrong with the banking, legal, and taxation systems
      in America; they are working exactly as they were designed to do.
      What is "wrong" is that the victims of these deceitful schemes are
      catching on and withdrawing cooperation (as is always the case at
      this stage of the economic/political game) and making a ruckus about
      the unfairness of it all. It is an old story, repeated time and
      again down through history, and this particular civilization has
      merely arrived at that point once again.

      The very notion that one must surrender his/her autonomy and place
      his/her destiny in the hands of a stranger and, generally speaking,
      a money-motivated, unprincipled, third-party initiate of a
      pirate "profession," i.e. an attorney, is false and fatally flawed
      on its face. The Legal Masters of the World have artfully swindled
      you out of your capacity to settle disputes privately—and then
      implemented a "protection service" whereby victim-customers must pay
      extortion-rate fees for a judicial shill (one who acts as a decoy,
      as for a pitchman), i.e. an attorney, to protect them from "the law"
      and other attorneys. The services available at John Henry Doe &
      Associates allow you to recapture and exercise your right to settle
      disputes privately, a right so natural that it is actually more of
      an innate, personal responsibility, one that comes with ownership
      and operation of a human body.

      Delightfully, based on the inherently fraudulent character of these
      three industries (each agenda of which is nearly always enforced by
      a member of the legal gang, i.e. an attorney) a proper response can
      expose a defect that can be used to emasculate[1] an attacker and
      get him/her to give up/go away.

      In the case of the banking system—and make no mistake: the legal
      system is here strictly to enforce and ensure the policies and
      objectives of the banking system, despite all illusions to the
      contrary—the flaw is that neither the bank, nor the attorney for the
      bank, can produce evidence, admissible as such in a court of law,
      that demonstrates that the bank has suffered harm as a result of the
      alleged loan transaction—a requirement in order for the bank to
      enforce its claim, but only if properly posed and insisted upon, in
      proper form, and not inadvertently/unwittingly conceded/verified by
      the alleged borrower. When debt collection personnel are put on the
      spot to prove up harm at the hands of an alleged borrower, said
      personnel are hamstrung by the obligation and inability to do so,
      and so cannot proceed without fear of serious and immediate legal
      repercussions, or are legally estopped (a legal term that means,
      essentially, barred from asserting a claim or right that contradicts
      what one has said or done before, or what has been legally
      established as true) from proceeding altogether.

      Although there is a growing number of knowledgeable people
      (worldwide) that are aware of the true nature of the duplicitous
      modern banking scheme and so-called "loan" process, virtually all
      come up short in knowing exactly how to "present their case" and get
      debt collectors to acknowledge the unsound nature of the claim and
      go away. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 USC §1692) is a
      useful tool in dealing with debt collectors, and can serve one if
      timely exploited, but is not necessary in order to get collection
      personnel to go away and permanently cease all collection activity
      on a particular alleged account/debt.

      What John Henry Doe & Associates has to offer is an effective way to
      deal with (1) debt-collector demands for payment, (2) debt-collector
      lawsuits, and (3) demands/requests for performance:

      (1) In the case of debt-collector demands for payment, the
      collection process is arrested at the very beginning, before it
      converts into a legal matter, and resolves matters privately either
      by (a) getting the collection personnel to go away and cease all
      collection activity, or (b) establishing documentary evidence that
      can be used to invalidate any subsequent claim should said debt-
      collection personnel, or any other debt-collection personnel, ever
      attempt to collect on the same alleged account/debt debt in the
      future, or (c) both of the above.

      (2) Debt-collector lawsuits are handled in a similar fashion as
      demands for payment, with even more profound results, but need to be
      addressed within a few days (two weeks is the limit) of service of
      summons and complaint in order to avoid burdensome entanglements and
      complications. Such can be overcome, but can be avoided altogether
      via prompt response.

      (3) Demands/requests for performance come in many shapes and sizes,
      and each is addressed in accordance with its unique
      characteristics. As with (1) and (2) above, the earlier such are
      confronted the better.

      The concepts of Honor and Dishonor (of demands and requests made by
      debt collectors and others) play heavily into the procedure of
      dealing with a attacker's written communication. "The devil[2] is
      in the details," (proverb) and the above services flush out
      everything alleged by an attacker in microscopic detail.

      In terms of demands and requests for payment or performance, to
      honor means, essentially, to accept and agree to come through with
      that which is demanded/requested, whether fully (unconditionally) or
      conditionally (upon successful completion of some condition, such as
      provision of proof of claim).

      Regarding handling debt collectors, the private settlement contract
      documents produced by John Henry Doe & Associates are conditional
      acceptances, and effectively put the ball back in the debt
      collector's court to demonstrate the validity of the alleged claim
      or concede that said claim is bogus and unenforceable. Most, but
      not all, other demands/requests for performance are also conditional
      acceptances, but do not necessarily appear in the form of a
      consensual contract, as is the case with debt collectors.

      Regarding debt collectors (FYI: all attorneys, including government,
      as well as IRS, attorneys, are legally classified as debt
      collectors), "the practice of law" never comes into play as long as
      one's initial response is timely/prompt—but even when not, there are
      ways to convert a public proceeding back into a private contractual
      affair without engaging in the practice of law and get things
      settled before any such public proceeding gets out of hand. John
      Henry Doe & Associates does not engage in the practice of law.

      In the event one allows a potential legal situation to develop too
      long, unattended, one may be faced with the dilemma of how to quell
      the legal repercussions of one's (dishonorable) omissions, an
      unfortunate state of affairs. That is why it is absolutely
      imperative that one tackle any debt-collection attempt, whether
      letter or lawsuit (as well as any other type of demand/request for
      performance) on an immediate basis. The procedure for killing off a
      debt-collection attempt on a debt that the collector is unable to
      verify (as that term, i.e. verify, is defined in law dictionaries)
      is now a simple procedure and is essentially the same for both debt-
      collector demand letter and lawsuit (with the end result that the
      former alleged debt is rendered invalid and permanently officially
      labeled as such). The method for handling demands/requests for
      performance is not dissimilar from that which is used to handle
      demands/requests for payment.

      Some timeless maxims of law:

      The contract makes the law (Le contrat fait la loi.).
      Consent makes the law (Consensus facit legem; i.e. a contract is the
      law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.).
      The agreement of the parties makes the law of the contract
      (Contractus legem ex conventione accipiunt.).
      The trick is in how to do business with a debt collector by engaging
      him/her in private consensual contract. Once any such contract is
      established, the "law between the parties"—irrespective of any prior
      agreement—is formalized. The Debt Collector-Demand Letter Response
      and -Lawsuit Response services result in a contract between the
      parties that acts as an estoppel (a bar that prevents one from
      asserting a claim or right that contradicts what one has said or
      done before, or what has been legally established as true) against
      the collector. The resulting contract is also effective as an
      estoppel against any other party that may somehow acquire the same
      former alleged account/debt and attempt collection thereon (what is
      rendered invalid in the initial debt-collection attempt cannot be
      made valid through sale/assignment/transfer thereafter).

      Additionally, for those who are familiar with the proprietary,
      copyrighted "Notice of Common Law Trademark" available exclusively
      through John Henry Doe & Associates, all the above services make
      accommodation for its use, if desired. Notice of Common Law
      Trademark is an effective secondary deterrent, setting up profound
      private consensual contractual financial obligations that are
      virtually immediately privately enforceable against debt-collection
      personnel who cannot substantiate the debt they seek to collect, yet
      insist on continuing anyway. It is noteworthy that there are very
      few, if any, attorneys that will continue with collection efforts
      following receipt of a private settlement contract and Notice of
      Common Law Trademark prepared by John Henry Doe & Associates. The
      effectiveness of the above services, however, is not dependent on
      utilization/employment of said Notice of Common Law Trademark.

      Further, there does not appear to be any reason that the techniques
      and procedures described herein will not work in other so-
      called "common-law countries," e.g. England, Australia, New Zealand,
      Canada, etc., and possibly even civil-law countries, such as France
      and Mexico.

      In closing, it should be pointed out that none of the hereinabove-
      described services are designed to help anyone escape accountability
      for his/her own acts/omissions. Rather, said private contractual
      document-preparation services are offered to assist potential
      victims of Big Brother's wealth and freedom confiscation and
      usurpation machinery to accept full responsibility for any alleged
      debt/obligation; and, in the event a particular alleged
      debt/obligation cannot be substantiated by the alleging party, to be
      able to establish conclusive evidence of that fact via evidentiary
      documents prepared by John Henry Doe & Associates. The route out of
      the current financial/legal/taxation jungle can be negotiated
      successfully only via acceptance of, as well as responsibility for,
      any and all extraneous demands for compliance that may cross one's

      Responsibility is always the key, whether for oneself, one's family,
      one's group, or mankind in general. The modern Western banking,
      legal, and taxation industries pose grave immediate and long-term
      consequences for all the aforementioned. The more responsibility
      one can assume in reforming these activities, the better one and
      those around one will do. The services offered on this website are
      one such effort in that direction.

      Disclaimer: The foregoing does not constitute legal advice and is
      not intended as such. If the reader is in need of legal advice the
      reader should consult a legal professional licensed to dispense


      [1] Emasculate: Castrate; destroy the strength or force of; weaken.

      [2] Devil: Anything difficult, hard to operate, control, understand,
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.