Re: [tips_and_tricks] Cannot access files section at website to locate Frog Farmer Email address.
- On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, at 07:07 AM, David-Allin: Sautter wrote:
> Yesterday, I was reading an attorney's certificate to practice lawYou got me - I didn't know that they did. I don't have to go that far
> from the California Supreme Court and it accorded in the text,
> reference to the oath as well as license. I have a copy of
> California's Constitution, Article XX, Section 3 with reference to the
> oath requirement, and I also have a copy of the Business and
> Professions Code Section 6067 that references an oath being attached to
> the license. My question then, to you Barry and/or Frog Farmer is how
> did the judiciary become authorized to dispense licenses.
to make the law work for me. I just use those documents you referenced
above. I don't care WHO dispenses anything, so far anyway (there's no
office that is not vacant in California! - and Oregon and Washington,
maybe even more places...the Soviet Union is gone too!)
> Recently, I was cited for blocking traffic when I got stuck in anIn Califiornia, "tickets" are not only bogus, they are voluntary. Why
> intersection and was issued a non-moving ticket for $177.
did you accept it if it was inappropriate to accept? You are
responsible for your actions (or you are not!)
> I was polite but emphasized that it would seem the officer's predationYou found an officer??!! WOW!! Where was this? I think you're probably
mistaken and were the victim of an impersonator. I'm surprised you
never tried to qualify him.
> was an opportunistic revenue plunder. He did not appreciate that,You should have challenged it right there. There might have been an
> then officiously declared that because it was not a moving violation,
> he did not have to show up in court, should I elect to challenge his
occasion for a mutual arrest.
> At the arraignment, I got the judge/referee to ackowledge my right toSome assistance! Why didn't you qualify the judge to make sure he
> obtain the assistance of an attorney.
really was a judge, and then immediately disqualify the judge for
cause? I've never seen a valid arraignment in over 25 years, but here
you say you were lucky enough to get one. WOW again! Of course, if you
waive enough rights the record would show you had one whether you really
did or not.
> I asked if she meant a licensed attorney, and she said "Yes, yes, aI know where it COULD go...
> licensed attorney!" See where this is going?
> My intent is to present the judge/referee with the documentation andThey're going to wonder why you accepted them, since they are as
> state that I could not locate a bonafide licensed attorney as requried
> by law.
disqualified as any attorney. They'll know you don't know what you're
talking about, or else you'd be disqualifying everybody involved. To
prove me wrong, produce the proper oath for anyone, and their name and
date they took it. So, "the judge" will want a list of all the
attorneys you've properly disqualified. You'd best disqualify some.
> What is the status or bearing of the attorney's certificate from theWhy did you allow everyone to impersonate an officer with no objection
> Supreme Court? My apologies for being verbose. Just looking for
or challenge on your part? Why did you honor their requests (since
unqualified neighbors cannot make lawful demands upon you in the name of
corporate entities)? Why are you willing to waive more rights by being
represented by an attorney? Why aren't you introducing the issue of
counsel of your own choice into the matter (no case, since there will be
no formal verified complaint on file)? You are being played like a
victim of the Impossible Missions Force, being made to think things are
real when they are fake, but you don't move to object in a timely
fashion, so the charade progresses. Every lie you permit to pass
becomes real on the record. Soon, when you cannot stand the pain, and
you finally stop cooperating, they may ask, "what took you so long?"
How many lies are you going to wait to go back over?
Have you even looked up the statute defining an arraignment? Tell me
that what happened to you conforms to that! I won't believe it!