Re: [tips_and_tricks] Re: First Amendment Right to not speak
>"Entities" need specially qualified people to speak and act for them,
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, gary2666@... wrote:
>> but I don't see it being accepted by either of those entities.
>> Can anyone cite a case or an IRS interview where this was used and
>> accepted as a justification for not answering questions? My
>> research capabilities are severely limited these days.
> One does not ask the opposition for permission to do
> anything. The case was presented for thoughtful
> expansion as one's imagination and determination
> will carry.
> Your research abilities are not all that is severely
unless those requirements are waived for some reason, such as by
I require that all qualifications be fulfilled before I let anyone
interrogate me, and if I'm in custody, I demand counsel be present, and he
has to be qualified as well.
Did I ever mention? Hardly anyone anywhere is qualified anymore.
The game has been over for a long time, yet many continue to pretend to
play. Someday it will be obvious to everyone, such as it became to those
who once cowered in fear of the Commissar in the USSR.