Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Criminal Court Does Not Deal in The Law Of Contracts

Expand Messages
  • Legalbear
    [8] The only other significant factual
    Message 1 of 2 , May 10, 2011
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment

      [8] The only other significant factual difference between the present case and Massiah is that here the police had agreed that they would not interrogate Williams in the absence of his counsel. This circumstance plainly provides petitioner with no argument for distinguishing away the protection afforded by Massiah.

      It is argued that this agreement may not have been an enforceable one. But we do not deal here with notions of offer, acceptance, consideration, or other concepts of the law of contracts. We deal with constitutional law. And every court that has looked at this case has found an "agreement" in the sense of a commitment made by the Des Moines police officers that Williams would not be questioned about Pamela Powers in the absence of his counsel. Brewer v. Williams, 430 US 387 (1977) fn 8.

       

       

      Call me at: 720-675-7230

      On Skype: legalbear

      Best times to call: 8:30 am to 9:00 pm MST

      Join my Yahoo Group Tips & Tricks for Court by sending an email to:

      tips_and_tricks-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      My blog: legalbearsblog.com

      Tax sites: IRSTerminator.com IRSLienThumper.com IRSLevyThumper.com

      (formatted like this so this email doesn't end up in your spam folder)

       

    • Frog Farmer
      Legalbear Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:08 PM ... But what if the chosen revenue target acts on their own volition to permit their case to be conducted in an
      Message 2 of 2 , May 10, 2011
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        Legalbear Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:08 PM
        > Subject: [tips_and_tricks] Criminal Court Does Not Deal in The Law Of
        > Contracts

        But what if the chosen revenue target acts on their own volition to
        permit their "case" to be conducted in an equity court using equity
        rules and ignoring constitutional common law because they never frame
        their objections in constitutional common law rights? Isn't that what
        happens most of the time? Those were not rhetorical or Socratic
        questions, they were observations made by a guy who doesn't get far out
        of his own chosen environment a lot, wide as it is, and that is what I
        see most of the time.

        Criminal Court Does Not Deal in The Law Of Contracts, true.

        So, they offer the target a choice:

        Would you like your case treated as a misdemeanor (criminal) or
        "infraction" (civil)? Guess which ramp the sheep prefer!

        Most never even recognize when they are given the choice, so they have a
        large form of waivers to sign for those who need to make an "X" at the
        bottom!

        They are not prepared to conduct proceedings here according to law.

        By refraining from being cajoled into waiving rights due to ignorance,
        one has a very good chance of "winning, duh!" because LAWFUL
        PREREQUISITES AND QUALIFICATIONS for lawful prosecutions CANNOT BE MET!

        Victims and others are permitted to pretend otherwise but may suffer
        consequences!

        Over and out!

        FF

        (a.k.a. "Johnny One-Note")
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.