What are Legislatures? Creatures of the Constitution: a judge who gets it :-)
- Michael wrote:
> --- In email@example.com, "Frog Farmer" <frogfrmr@...>George Gordon said, "The conversation breaks right down."
> > The game that I've been saying is over for years
> > is the one that relies upon the use of the word
> > "dollar". Every time my usurping impersonating
> > neighbors come against me for some reason, they
> > always involve the use of that word! But they
> > are never using it properly! So I don't play
> > with them and they get saddened by my reaction
> > to their administrative attempts.
> With so much to learn in order to do, this is one
> of those lessons that shouts out as key, for it does
> silence those who would otherwise trod over one's
> singular, real existence. It may not be the "silver
> bullet," but it has the effect of driving a wooden
> stake through the heart of the opposition.
That's what I want out of every IMOC. I want us all to go separate ways
and have a nice day. Otherwise no one knows what might happen! I
definitely know that some paycheck anticipators may become at risk at
their station at the public feeding trough, and make that known in the
moments following the IMOC (which takes a minute or less, right? Maybe
just a millisecond? Nanosecond now with robot computer witnesses??).
My last IMOC and subsequent hours proved very interesting. I have to
say, unless they're just stalling for time while targeting the guided
missile, or prepping the sniper, they do have me thinking that I'm on
the right track for achieving my main goal, which is to be left alone.
> Mention has been made of my case against the IllinoisWhen you win, recognize it and back off, is a lesson I learned on my
> Toll Authority challenging what is being demanded
> as payment. While a court "loss," it has not resulted
> in any. In my appeal, which was dismissed as "untimely,"
> in a ploy used by the appellate court to chicken out,
> the Summary Order dismissing it came back as "This
> Order Is Not Precedential And Is Not To Be Cited."
> Certainly, the money issue struck a nerve!
very first case. I won too early, but was a new law student
(non-school) and had plans to see this and that later step "work". So
when I won early I didn't recognize it, and then I was dumb enough to
make sure they continued with the process. In doing so, we all had lots
of "fun" and I got to train many new hires (I was the grist for their
mill) for three years. I was worked hard, but I was happy to get the
education I so wanted! BUT, looking back, I wish I had spared myself
the trouble, because other following cases took other time that could
have used more quality time and attention...
> I recently read that no court will allow ANY case,That's okay, because followers need not apply. We all need our own
> from one who is without an attorney and who wins,
> [and even those who do not "win" but raise the issue
> of "money."] to be published lest the publication of
> it be used as a learning tool for others and be a
> source for more of the same.
position that we own, not somebody else's that sounds good and we'll try
> Everyone, [excepting those who already "do"] on thisSylvester Stallone just said it! "ABSOLUTELY!"
> site should take note of the FACT that the money issue
> is an important tool to be used in every possible
> instance where any form of government is making a
> demand to pay either "$" or "pay the amount..." The
> door was just opened as wide as can be. Walk through
> it to your advantage.
> The most common type of court case anyone is exposedBetter yet, in the IMOC!!! And every step thereafter!!! Make these
> to is traffic. Use the money issue when a determination
> of "guilt" is made.
paycheck anticipators burn a few calories off between their ears!
> Object and demand to know what isNo!! Too vague and might lead to embarrassing admissions and
> being demanded as a fine, in what form, etc.
confessions! The question for the Knaves is:
(As taught to me by Merrill Jenkins):
"WHAT is the current MONEY OF ACCOUNT of the United States and HOW MUCH
of THAT is a "Dollar" Quantity?"
When you asked that question, you just pulled the pin...what comes next
could be "interesting". A lot depends upon your personal knowledge of
the subject so that you can refute lies instantaneously, as a lie
acceded to looks like fact in the record.
> This smallRight! NO EXCUSE WHY NOT!! Except that the pizza on the front seat
> step, if used by many, and there is NO excuse why not,
might get cold! Or, my kids were at home alone, or...etc.
> will lead to bigger steps, like me now challenging whatHere is a story I might have told before, short version. I guy I know
> is being demanded to pay property tax, and HOW was the
> assessment determined?
used pinto beans to pay, and waited for an objection. No objection! Why
would a paycheck-anticipating unsworn impersonator of an assessor want
to rock his own cushy boat!? That guy was not the only one to say "No!"
in his own unique style. None of this depends upon your adversary
understanding anything! Did you hear? At last check almost half of
Detroit's Americans cannot read! Does anyone know the numbers where
they are? I don't care what they are, I assume everyone I meet is a
moron or imbecile until they prove otherwise. I'm a self-designated
idiot clown, in the original sense. I'm pleased as punch to meet a
> If you are not willing to take the first step, thenFEAR = False Evidence Appearing Real
> realize you are sanctioning that which you seemingly
> oppose. Is it "fear?" Turn that "fear" into fight!
Prove that wrong to yourself, go ahead, try!
> Thanks to FF for presenting this, among so manyAw shucks, I like you too! Last gems I used were at an Indian Casino -
> other issues. The FF, a user of gems who is one
makum heap big wampum! Unfortunately, two squaws ripped me off for most
of that big wampum. I know, I sound callous using that term, but they
used it first ("kinda like" Blacks use the N word)! They use their
Tribal membership to make the cost of fighting their rip-off too much
for me, and they were successful. That's okay because I take their
whole casino for many many times more nickels than they got taking two
little orange tourmalines.
A funny thing about casinos is the front panels on a lot of the slot
machines have gems prominently displayed among piles of paper money and
columns of gold and silver coins, and gold and silver bars. The Gems
are actually the most concentrated form of wealth in the picture. If
you had to run with the first thing you'd grab, most Americans would
grab the paper money. So sad! Orientals tend to grok the inclusion of
gems, while few Americans can even approximate the values.
> Silver has just taken a precipitious drop from justYes, and if one is at all interested but skeptical, there is much
> under $50 to as low as just under $34. This may be
> one of the most significant fire sales for silver
> in everyone's lifetime. Those who want to be "doers"
> have to take SOME form of action, and buying silver,
> in any quantity, is one of the most important ways
> of making a difference when it otherwise seems so
written about it already.
> Buying silver is better than making a "registered vote."By your own law it is THE MONEY. Most Americans have no American money.
Even bums had it when I was a kid! Everybody had it, but went for paper
instead, well, not "everybody".
> Resolve to make a difference, today...everyday! MakingJump in, the water's fine!
> a difference is a matter of choice. Make your choice
> a matter of habit, and you will soon see a difference.
> Let me add that I have fought other cases, mostlyTHAT is WHY disqualifying EVERYBODY is cost effective for you!
> traffic, that I lost. My argument was pretty solid,
> and no state attorney effectively counter-argued me.
> It was always the judge who made a final adverse
> determination, often for a bogus reason, and the
> appellate would back up the decision.
> Cost to me? Fines. Cost to the STATE, double orThat is the crux, corporeal versus corporate.
> triple, if not more, in obtaining the fines. The
> system cannot afford to operate that way, but it
> absorbs minor losses, like mine, because it is
> cheaper than taking on hundreds of others who would
> choose to fight, who simply choose not to fight.
> I may not be the best example, nor offer the best
> examples, but I am in there, refusing to cooperate
> with the corporate.
> I present my poorly executedWho is to judge your fight when nobody but you is there to witness it
> examples for others to use and improve upon, at will.
> It is from here that I received so much in order to do.
> Isn't that what this site is all about, he asked
live? There is not time to wait until somebody "does it" perfectly and
then also happens to write about it perfectly on this here list!
> Cheers!"If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right."
- George Gordon