Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [tips_and_tricks] no crime no name

Expand Messages
  • E Junker
    Driving is considered a privilege. Walking down the street a right. I had nearly the same occurrence. A friend I was riding with was stopped and I refused
    Message 1 of 2 , Oct 29, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Driving is considered a privilege.  Walking down the street a right.
      I had nearly the same occurrence.     A friend I was riding with was stopped and I refused to identify myself to the thug.

      At court the judge asked, "How do you plead?"
      I replied, "I don't know."


      From: Jerry Stanton <farm_stone@...>
      To: Cornforth-Strategies@yahoogroups.com; Freedom_of_Information@yahoogroups.com; generalcongress@...; MYRLANDsMETHODs@yahoogroups.com; World-wide_Politics@yahoogroups.com; Un rep <TheUnrepentantPatriots@yahoogroups.com>; Tips-and -Tricks <tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Fri, October 29, 2010 4:13:46 PM
      Subject: [tips_and_tricks] no crime no name



      Would think then, this would also mean you do not have to show a license or any thing else, less you where committing  a criminal act. Jerry

      U.S. Supreme Court

      Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979)

       Here, the State does not contend that appellant was stopped pursuant to a practice embodying neutral criteria, and the officers' actions were not justified on the ground that they had a reasonable suspicion, based on objective facts, that he was involved in criminal activity. Absent any basis for suspecting appellant of misconduct, the balance between the public interest in crime prevention and appellant's right to personal

      Page 443 U. S. 48

      security and privacy tilts in favor of freedom from police interference.

      Pp. 443 U. S. 50-53.


      BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.