Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Can a free man be forced into a civil law court?

Expand Messages
  • Jerry
    The fore matting changed when I cut and pasted this affidavit to a civil law court. The question is can they arrest you for exercising your inalienable rights.
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 25, 2009
      The fore matting changed when I cut and pasted this affidavit to a
      civil law court. The question is can they arrest you for exercising your inalienable rights. So far I,am still free and traveling in
      my private car.
      Jerry


      To: Judge Brent R. Wiegle v
      Judge David Coyle of
      3-A Judicial District


      31 Division Street
      Coldwater, Michigan near 49036
      Verified Mail Number 030806600000226851

      September 8, 2009

      RE: Return of Fictitious 14 days Notice, Offer to Pay, and Affidavit of Facts

      Dear Judge Brent R. Wiegle:

      I am returning the enclosed fictitious 14-day notice of arrest warrant that came to this writer but was addressed to:
      STANTON/JERRY/JAMES
      4340 SOUTH ALLEN ROAD
      ALLEN, MI 49227

      This is your notice that I do not consent to this 14-day fictitious notice of arrest warrant sent to a fictitious person and it is being returned.

      OFFER TO PAY

      I offer to pay any fines or bonds that are required of me as a sovereign elector and free man where I have proper, legal notice of same and that is sent to my legal name and address as indicated in the beginning of this document. Send all legal documents you are using to make your claim of debt owed and authority to collect or arrest a non-commercial and sovereign elector who uses the road under his antecedent Right of free passage on the Public Right of Way.

      REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION

      Please verify the Corporation of Branch County 3A Judicial District Court, a civil law court, a subdivision of the Corporation of the STATE OF MICHIGAN has jurisdiction over Jerry James Stanton, a Sovereign Elector/Progenitor freeman with all this inalienable rights intact, who is noncommercial, and that the corporation of CITY of COLDWATER Police Dept, has standing over Sovereign Elector/Progenitor freeman Jerry James Stanton to issue a citation which could result in arrest.

      NOTICE OF NON CONSENT
      Affiant asserts for the record the U.S. Supreme Court case of Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 [Dall] U.S. 419 (1793) which affirms the State, and thus its political and corporate subdivisions, being created by the Affiant as a Sovereign Elector/Progenitor (Evert Romein v. General Motors Corporation, 462 N.W.2d 555, 436 Mich. 515 (1990), Freeman, whom the State and its political and corporate subdivisions are forever legally barred from enacting any law, statute, code, or policy that would ever trespass upon Affiant's Rights, with or without his consent. (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943); Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 345 (1960); Smith v. Allwright, 321 US 649, 664 (1944); Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n, 271 U.S. 583 (1926); Connolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Company, 184 U.S. 540, 558 (1902); McCullough v. Virginia, 19 S. Ct. 134, 172. U.S. 102 (1898); Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d 486 (1956); Harmen v. Foressenius, 380 U.S. 528, 540 (1965); Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F.2d 945, 947 (1973); United States v. Guthrie, 789 F3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1996); 16 Am.Jur. (2nd), Const. Law, § 81; 16 Am.Jur. (2nd), Const. Law, § 70)

      Therefore, Affiant states at this time, pursuant to the fundamental and Organic Laws of the United States of America, including but not limited to the Declaration of Independence (1776), and the word "unalienable" therein, that he DOES NOT AND CANNOT CONSENT, even under DECEPTIVE and COERCIVE acts of the state against his Property, Liberty and Rights to any actions of any Court under color of Statutory Law against his Common Law Antecedent Rights without a Sworn, Signed, and Verified Complaint of physical Damage to Life, Limb, or Property of an equivalent Sovereign Elector, or human being passing through the Lands of Michigan:

      "the Declaration of Independence, that new evangel of liberty to the people: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident' — that is so plain that their truth is recognized upon their mere statement — 'that all men are endowed' — not by edicts of Emperors, or decrees of Parliament, or acts of Congress, but 'by their Creator with certain inalienable rights' — that is, rights which cannot be bartered away, or given away, or taken away except in punishment of crime — ' "Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, Bk. I. Chap. 10."(emphasis added)
      Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, 756, 4 S.Ct. 652 (1884) Justice Field Concurring

      Affiant has not ever given power of Attorney to any STATE ot local agency.

      AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS

      1. Affiant is not in possession of any evidence to the contrary that the above named Recipients have been NOTIFIED and placed upon Public Notice by the above noted Instrument of Michigan "Public Record in Hillsdale County at the County Clerk's Office Book 1944 Page 441 County I.D. number 0807" that the Affiant is legally named "Jerry James Stanton" is legally and politically Sovereign Elector of Michigan (See: Romein, supra) who does not exist by its authority (McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819), "The sovereignty of a state extends to everything which exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission."), but that the State exists by his authority.

      2. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that there is no fictitious person by the name of STANTON/JERRY/JAMES or STANTON/JERRY.

      3. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that the above fictitious names were created by agents and there attorneys of the Corp. STATE OF MICHIGAN under deception and fraud for the sole purpose of extorting federal reserve notes from the Sovereign Elector/Progenitor(s) of the state under color of law for there own personal gain while depriving unalienable rights of the people, by fraudulent licensing those common rights that were sup post to be forever.

      4. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that he mailed 3 A District Court a copy on June 9, 2009 verified Mail NO;0308 0660 0000 2268 9424 ADMISSIONS that were sent to Corporate Police Department of the City of CITY OF COLDWATER, giving that police dept every opportunity to show standing.

      5. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that no response was received, and thus a Notice of Default was sent to this court via verified number 0308-1400-0001-1649-4511 and COLDWATER CITY police dept. on July 1, 2009 .


      6. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary, that Branch County 3A District Court has been not legally notified that Sgt. David Crilly and the Coldwater Police Department has no standing to write "Jerry James Stanton" a traffic citation for any commercial traffic code violation.

      7. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary, that all mailings that are sent by this court to STANTON/JERRY/JAMES have been returned via verified mail and with an explanation that there is no such fictitious person as "STANTON/JERRY/JAMES".

      8. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that any contract between "Jerry James Stanton" and the Corporate State of Michigan, or it's corporate subdivision of corporate city of Coldwater or it's police department, by which Affiant may appear to have given up his inalienable rights as a Sovereign Elector cannot and can never be binding pursuant to the fundamental law of the United States of America in the Declaration of Independence (1776) using the word "unalienable" (See: Butchers Union, supra)



      9. Affiant is not in receipt of verified evidence to the contrary that if he is not properly named in a suit or any legal action or document, that such misnomer would be a fatal flaw to that document and it could not carry any force of law or even a legal notice under any circumstances, with or without his consent.

      10. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that this 3-A Judicial District Court is a Corporation for Profit as registered with Dunn and Bradstreet, and therefore has profit motive in its existence, as opposed to pure function of justice to antecedent Rights.

      11. Affiant is not in possession of any evidence to the contrary that the above named Recipients participate in the fines of the Corporation and therefore are Biased and Prejudiced in favor of their paychecks could never give a lawful court ruling.

      12. Affiant is not in possession of any evidence to the contrary that the Rulings of the United States Supreme Court are binding upon this District Court of Branch County Michigan in all of its proceedings; or its Judges; or its Officers.

      13. Affiant is not in possession of any evidence to the contrary that the above named Recipients, are fully aware of the Law of the Land as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court that the only absolute authority of the legislature and thus the courts created by the legislature is solely over entities created by the legislature (McCulloch v. Maryland, supra).

      14. Affiant is not in possession of any evidence to the contrary that the above named Recipients, as both Attorneys and Judges, are completely subject to the maxim of "ignoratia juris non excusat", and due to their official position are held to an ever higher standard of subjugation to this rule, and thus have no defense of ignorance of the natural law that binds the Courts as it binds its creator the Legislature.

      15. Affiant is not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that "Jerry James Stanton", as a Sovereign Elector/Progenitor of the organic state of Michigan can never make any direct, indirect, implied, or actual contract with the corporate 3A District court of Branch County to give up his antecedent Rights to be then be subject to civil law court that has any authority to ignore his antecedent fundamental Rights.

      16. Affiant not in receipt of any verified evidence to the contrary that this court issues an arrest warrant for the arrest of the legal and statutory fiction STANTON/JERRY/JAMES, in order to affect the arrest of the Sovereign Elector/Progenitor Jerry James Stanton would constitute a felony and a criminal trespass.

      17. Affiant is not in any receipt of verified evidence to the contrary that if a MICHIGAN District Court Judge issued a arrest warrant for a Sovereign Elector/Progenitor freeman after being legally notified that the plaintiff State failed and/or refused to show standing as required by law, the courts jurisdiction has been lawfully challenged and must be shown and proved on the record before it can proceed, and that said judge would be knowingly acting outside this legal authority which would make the arrest warrant a be a blatant act of treason, on which the judge would be totally responsible for on his personal actions outside his official capacity, as the arrest constitutes a criminal trespass to extort federal reserve notes for personal gain which is completely unsupportable by law and color of law.

      18. Affiant is not in possession of any evidence to the contrary that there is no law that can be created to penalize the Affiant for taking specific and legitimate action to return the Liberty of his Rights to himself, as no law can be enacted to penalize the exercise of a Right (Miranda, Frost & Frost Trucking Co., Connolly, McCullough, Miller, Harmen, Sherar, Guthrie, and, Gomillion, supra, and Watson v. City of Memphis, 373 U.S. 526, 537 (1963)).

      § 876. Mailing threatening communications
      (d) Whoever, with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of value, knowingly so deposits or causes to be delivered, as aforesaid, any communication, with or without a name or designating mark subscribed thereto, addressed to any other person and containing any threat to injure the property or reputation of the addressee or of another, or the reputation of a deceased person, or any threat to accuse the addressee or any other person of a crime, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. If such a communication is addressed to a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official who is covered by section 1114, the individual shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.


      § 880. Receiving the proceeds of extortion
      A person who receives, possesses, conceals, or disposes of any money or other property which was obtained from the commission of any offense under this chapter that is punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year, knowing the same to have been unlawfully obtained, shall be imprisoned not more than 3 years, fined under this title, or both.

      REPLY PROCEDURES

      Notice is hereby given that in order to avoid any misunderstanding on this matter; all communications will henceforth be in writing and duly served. Any response that controverts the facts set forth above are to be sent by notarized affidavit and be true, correct, complete and not misleading under penalty of perjury and must be in like form, inclusive of signing such affidavit using Christian name/name given at birth, give in uppercase and lowercase format, not set in all-capital letters, being fully liable, living breathing man/woman, responsible/liable for everything such man/woman says and does, and mail to: Jerry James Stanton, Care of 4340 South Allen Road, Allen, Michigan.

      Further, any response from addressee that does not have this office holder's signature is not a legal response. No signed response from addressee gives sender legal assumption there is no standing by the accuser or jurisdiction found by this court. Any further non compliant court orders from this court will be considered fictitious and void and carry no force of law.

      No response to this document in ten (10) days will be evidence that this notice were fraudulent and facts set forth in the AFIDAVIT OF FACTS are true, can be published in all local and state papers and put in the public record for all to know.


      I swear (or affirm) that the above information is true and accurate, to the best of my present knowledge according to the laws of the United state of America and the organic state Michigan and I have been duly sworn by the attesting notary public listed below, with explicit reservation of all of my Rights and waiver of none, even against the commercialization and nullification of my Right by Notary, as one cannot and never can be compelled to waive any Rights in order to pursue another Right, especially Remedy:


      ____________________________________________________

      Jerry James Stanton,
      A Sovereign Elector/Progenitor free man upon the land
      Who reserves all rights.
      Whose mail is received when addressed
      Care of 4340 South Allen Road
      Allen Michigan
      Which is the only proper spelling and style of name and state.

      Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,

      This _______ day of _______________ 20________.in Hillsdale County in State Michigan


      ___________________________________________
      Signature of Notary

      My Commission expires: ______________________
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.