Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [tips_and_tricks] Analysis and Interpretation:: Constitution of the United States,

Expand Messages
  • enilak666@yahoo.com
    It seems there is a real difference between a Constitution of and for the USA. In the original they used for meaning: on behalf of, while now the word
    Message 1 of 4 , May 8, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      It seems there is a real difference between a Constitution "of" and "for" the USA. In the original they used "for" meaning: on behalf of, while now the word "of" meaning: from, or derived, places a different context on the document. I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but this bears looking into.

      --- On Thu, 5/7/09, Frog Farmer <frogfrmr@...> wrote:

      From: Frog Farmer <frogfrmr@...>
      Subject: RE: [tips_and_tricks] Analysis and Interpretation:: Constitution of the United States,
      To: tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 5:04 PM

      Dave wrote:
      > Subject: [tips_and_tricks] Analysis and Interpretation: : Constitution
      > of the United States,
      >
      > For those who like reading written law for government and its
      > interpretations:
      >
      > http://www.gpoacces s.gov/constituti on/

      What I like reading are the lies that are laid over the law by those who
      have a reason for it, like this one I saw right away upon reading that
      site:

      "In addition, it lays out the basic rights of citizens of the United
      States."

      No, it doesn't, and for real money I'd prove it, otherwise I'd rather
      leave my antagonists in ignorance.

      Do I get 500 Frog Points for Early Lie Detection?

      Regards,

      FF


    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.