Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

FW: 21 States Claiming Sovereignty

Expand Messages
  • Gary D
    Hey new worthy ( yet no news ) who is thinking out there? Best, Gary Subject: 21 States Claiming Sovereignty Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:22:55 -0500 21 States
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 9, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Hey new worthy ( yet no news ) who is thinking out there?

      Best, Gary


      Subject: 21 States Claiming Sovereignty
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:22:55 -0500

      21 States Claiming Sovereignty: AZ, AL, AK, AR, CA, CO, GA, HI, ID, IN, KS, ME, MI, MO, MT, NH, NV, OK, PA, TX, & WA



      *** 21 States now Claiming / Planning ***
      Wow… it will be interesting to see how this turns out… it’s about time people started stepping up and speaking out.  As people have pointed out in comments, all of these (except for HI) are explicit restatements of what has always been in place, but not necessarily enforced, as detailed by the 10th Amendment.  HI is actually aiming for total sovereignty as it is claimed that HI was never really a state of the U.S. to begin with.  However, I believe the intent of these bills is to let the federal government know that the states’ sovereignty will not be overwritten… say in case certain gun ban laws get passed… or other “War Time / Martial Law” type plans come into play.  Check them out:

      AZ: http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm
      AL: (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      AK:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      AR:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      CA: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/93-94/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sjr_44_bill_940829_chaptered
      CO:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      GA: http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/1995_96/leg/fulltext/sr308.htm
      HI: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/07-1372.htm
      ID:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      IN:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      KS:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      ME:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      MI: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(21rmjiv1sl0wvw55yxurwl55))/documents/2009-2010/Journal/House/pdf/2009-HJ-01-22-002.pdf
      MO: http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills091/bills/HR212.HTM
      MT: http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm
      NH: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html
      NV:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      OK: http://www.ok-safe.com/files/documents/1/HJR1089_int.pdf
      PA:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
      TX: (not officially declared recently, but is supposedly sovereign since it was never willfully ceded to the States - put on planning list)
      WA: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?year=2009&bill=4009


      http://www.mrstep.com/politics/az-wa-mo-nh-ok-claiming-sovereignty/

       

       



      CyberDefender has scanned this email for potential threats.
      Version 2.0 / Build 4.03.29.01
      Get free PC security at http://www.cyberdefender.com
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.