Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Statute of limitations on fraud starts when the fraud is discovered

Expand Messages
  • legalbear7
    In Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392, 66 S. Ct. 582, 585, 90 L. Ed. 743, the Supreme Court said the rule adopted by it was that where a plaintiff has been
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 16, 2008
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment

      In Holmberg v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392, 66 S. Ct. 582, 585, 90 L. Ed. 743, the Supreme Court said the rule adopted by it was that "where a plaintiff has been injured by fraud and 'remains in ignorance of it without any fault or want of diligence or care on his part, the bar of the statute does not begin to run until the fraud is discovered, though there be no special circumstances or efforts on the part of the party committing the fraud to conceal it from the knowledge of the other party.'"

       

      Phones: 970-613-8866 (1st) 720-203-5142 c. (2nd) Skype: Legalbear

       

      Bear's Webpages:

      www.irs-armory.com www.irslevythumper.com www.irslienthumper.com www.judgeonaleash.com www.freedivorceforms.net www.legalbears.com

       

      Bear's Free Yahoo Group: Tips & Tricks for Court
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.