Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

No Suprise:Tax Honesty Advocate Sherry Peel Jackson Gets Railroaded!

Expand Messages
  • vivus_spartacus
    Let s See: BIG MISTAKE: PUTTING TRUST IN AN ATTORNEY (OFFICER OF THE COURT) NEWLY CONVICTED Sherry Peel Jackson NAIVELY hired an OFFICER OF THE COURT,
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 31, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Let's See:

      BIG MISTAKE:

      PUTTING TRUST IN AN ATTORNEY (OFFICER OF THE COURT)

      NEWLY CONVICTED Sherry Peel Jackson
      NAIVELY hired an OFFICER OF THE COURT,
      (Over-Rated/Over-Paid IMHO)Lowell (Larry) Becraft
      to "RE-PRESENT" Her in Court, THEREBY EFFECTIVELY Granting the Court
      the PERSONAM JURISDICTION IT WAS PREVIOULSY LACKING!


      Then TRUSTS same Attorney/Officer of the Court,

      (WHOSE FIRST OBLIGATION IS TO THE COURT & NOT HIS CLIENT!)

      WHO UNDOUBTEDLY FAILS TO MENTION TO HIS CLIENT HOW HE JUST
      BACKDOORED A PERSONAM JURISDICTIONAL GRANT LEADING TO THE DEMISE OF
      HIS CLIENT,

      to Defend Her Non-Recognized RIGHTS in a SHARK INFESTED STAR CHAMBER!


      No Doubt Ms. Jackson was also unaware that her Attorney of Choice is
      CLUELESS (Whether by a Defect in His Intelligence or Perhaps even a
      Far More Sinister Explanation) concerning the FRAUD that transpired
      back in 1948 concerning the 18 USC 3231 Criminal Jurisdiction
      Allegation and therefore would undoubtedly FAIL to Effectively
      Challenge Jurisdiction on those grounds.

      That's Right! When I Recently discovered Mr. Becraft openly
      displaying his ostensible IGNORANCE & APATHY concerning 18 USC 3231
      I was Blown Away and was compelled to Contact Him privately
      concerning Same only to be further blown away by his Asinine
      Response, which only further validated the Wise Words of Warning by
      Learned Men in Law such as Chief Justice Berger, Yale Law Professor
      Fred Rodell, and R. Kessler, Dean of Fordham University Law School.

      GEE HOW IS IT that an Attorney being an expert in Law, Not Only
      Managed to have Every One of His Motions (including (?)JURISDICTION)
      DENIED, FAILED To Get His Client a STAY of Trial Pending the Outcome
      of Appeal on his Denied Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction,
      before the District Court of Appeals???

      Since Way Back before the advent of the Internet, before Larry
      Becraft, or ANY PAYTRIOTS FOR PROFIT GURUS appeared hawking their
      flawed theories and snake oil cure alls,
      the IRS/DOJ/USDC LOST BIG TIME TO A MERE PRO PER IN THE DISTRICT
      COURT OF APPEALS ON THESE VERY SAME JURISDICTIONAL GROUNDS AND THEIR
      BOGUS FELONY & MISDEMEANOR CRIMINAL CHARGES EVAPORATED LIKE DRY ICE
      ON A HOT SUMMER'S DAY.


      FYI-BIG MISTAKE NUMBER 2:

      UNWISELY HIRING AN ATTORNEY AND THEN NOT LISTING/MAINTAINING ONESELF
      AS "CO-COUNSEL"

      Should One Ever Be Faced with a Situation whereby an Attorney either
      refuses or fails to Properly argue ALL Jurisdiction Challenges
      before Trial, or One simply can no longer afford to Keep Paying the
      Attorney, ONLY by maintaining "Co-Counsel" Status, Can One Argue
      One's Motions/Case at the Appellate Level!


      "The first thing we do, lets kill all the lawyers"
      William Shakespeare, King Henry VI Part II, Act IV, Scene II


      "But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!"
      Words of the Lord, Matthew 23:13

      Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace, but as
      debt. Romans 4:4

      Wisdom IS the principal thing; Therefore get wisdom. And in all your
      getting, Get understanding. Proverbs 4:7


      "vivus spartacus"
      All Rights Reserved (In the 9th Amendment)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.